Cargando…

Sink-Type-Dependent Data-Gathering Frameworks in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comparative Study

Owing to automation trends, research on wireless sensor networks (WSNs) has become prevalent. In addition to static sinks, ground and aerial mobile sinks have become popular for data gathering because of the implementation of WSNs in hard-to-reach or infrastructure-less areas. Consequently, several...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nazib, Rezoan Ahmed, Moh, Sangman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8073593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33923854
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21082829
_version_ 1783684165923766272
author Nazib, Rezoan Ahmed
Moh, Sangman
author_facet Nazib, Rezoan Ahmed
Moh, Sangman
author_sort Nazib, Rezoan Ahmed
collection PubMed
description Owing to automation trends, research on wireless sensor networks (WSNs) has become prevalent. In addition to static sinks, ground and aerial mobile sinks have become popular for data gathering because of the implementation of WSNs in hard-to-reach or infrastructure-less areas. Consequently, several data-gathering mechanisms in WSNs have been investigated, and the sink type plays a major role in energy consumption and other quality of service parameters, such as packet delivery ratio, delay, and throughput. However, the data-gathering schemes based on different sink types in WSNs have not been investigated previously. This paper reviews such data-gathering frameworks based on three different types of sinks (i.e., static, ground mobile, and aerial mobile sinks), analyzing the data-gathering frameworks both qualitatively and quantitatively. First, we examine the frameworks by discussing their working principles, advantages, and limitations, followed by a qualitative comparative study based on their main ideas, optimization criteria, and performance evaluation parameters. Next, we present a simulation-based quantitative comparison of three representative data-gathering schemes, one from each category. Simulation results are shown in terms of energy efficiency, number of dead nodes, number of exchanged control packets, and packet drop ratio. Finally, lessons learned from the investigation and recommendations made are summarized.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8073593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80735932021-04-27 Sink-Type-Dependent Data-Gathering Frameworks in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comparative Study Nazib, Rezoan Ahmed Moh, Sangman Sensors (Basel) Review Owing to automation trends, research on wireless sensor networks (WSNs) has become prevalent. In addition to static sinks, ground and aerial mobile sinks have become popular for data gathering because of the implementation of WSNs in hard-to-reach or infrastructure-less areas. Consequently, several data-gathering mechanisms in WSNs have been investigated, and the sink type plays a major role in energy consumption and other quality of service parameters, such as packet delivery ratio, delay, and throughput. However, the data-gathering schemes based on different sink types in WSNs have not been investigated previously. This paper reviews such data-gathering frameworks based on three different types of sinks (i.e., static, ground mobile, and aerial mobile sinks), analyzing the data-gathering frameworks both qualitatively and quantitatively. First, we examine the frameworks by discussing their working principles, advantages, and limitations, followed by a qualitative comparative study based on their main ideas, optimization criteria, and performance evaluation parameters. Next, we present a simulation-based quantitative comparison of three representative data-gathering schemes, one from each category. Simulation results are shown in terms of energy efficiency, number of dead nodes, number of exchanged control packets, and packet drop ratio. Finally, lessons learned from the investigation and recommendations made are summarized. MDPI 2021-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8073593/ /pubmed/33923854 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21082829 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Nazib, Rezoan Ahmed
Moh, Sangman
Sink-Type-Dependent Data-Gathering Frameworks in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comparative Study
title Sink-Type-Dependent Data-Gathering Frameworks in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comparative Study
title_full Sink-Type-Dependent Data-Gathering Frameworks in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Sink-Type-Dependent Data-Gathering Frameworks in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Sink-Type-Dependent Data-Gathering Frameworks in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comparative Study
title_short Sink-Type-Dependent Data-Gathering Frameworks in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comparative Study
title_sort sink-type-dependent data-gathering frameworks in wireless sensor networks: a comparative study
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8073593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33923854
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21082829
work_keys_str_mv AT nazibrezoanahmed sinktypedependentdatagatheringframeworksinwirelesssensornetworksacomparativestudy
AT mohsangman sinktypedependentdatagatheringframeworksinwirelesssensornetworksacomparativestudy