Cargando…
Sink-Type-Dependent Data-Gathering Frameworks in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comparative Study
Owing to automation trends, research on wireless sensor networks (WSNs) has become prevalent. In addition to static sinks, ground and aerial mobile sinks have become popular for data gathering because of the implementation of WSNs in hard-to-reach or infrastructure-less areas. Consequently, several...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8073593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33923854 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21082829 |
_version_ | 1783684165923766272 |
---|---|
author | Nazib, Rezoan Ahmed Moh, Sangman |
author_facet | Nazib, Rezoan Ahmed Moh, Sangman |
author_sort | Nazib, Rezoan Ahmed |
collection | PubMed |
description | Owing to automation trends, research on wireless sensor networks (WSNs) has become prevalent. In addition to static sinks, ground and aerial mobile sinks have become popular for data gathering because of the implementation of WSNs in hard-to-reach or infrastructure-less areas. Consequently, several data-gathering mechanisms in WSNs have been investigated, and the sink type plays a major role in energy consumption and other quality of service parameters, such as packet delivery ratio, delay, and throughput. However, the data-gathering schemes based on different sink types in WSNs have not been investigated previously. This paper reviews such data-gathering frameworks based on three different types of sinks (i.e., static, ground mobile, and aerial mobile sinks), analyzing the data-gathering frameworks both qualitatively and quantitatively. First, we examine the frameworks by discussing their working principles, advantages, and limitations, followed by a qualitative comparative study based on their main ideas, optimization criteria, and performance evaluation parameters. Next, we present a simulation-based quantitative comparison of three representative data-gathering schemes, one from each category. Simulation results are shown in terms of energy efficiency, number of dead nodes, number of exchanged control packets, and packet drop ratio. Finally, lessons learned from the investigation and recommendations made are summarized. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8073593 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80735932021-04-27 Sink-Type-Dependent Data-Gathering Frameworks in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comparative Study Nazib, Rezoan Ahmed Moh, Sangman Sensors (Basel) Review Owing to automation trends, research on wireless sensor networks (WSNs) has become prevalent. In addition to static sinks, ground and aerial mobile sinks have become popular for data gathering because of the implementation of WSNs in hard-to-reach or infrastructure-less areas. Consequently, several data-gathering mechanisms in WSNs have been investigated, and the sink type plays a major role in energy consumption and other quality of service parameters, such as packet delivery ratio, delay, and throughput. However, the data-gathering schemes based on different sink types in WSNs have not been investigated previously. This paper reviews such data-gathering frameworks based on three different types of sinks (i.e., static, ground mobile, and aerial mobile sinks), analyzing the data-gathering frameworks both qualitatively and quantitatively. First, we examine the frameworks by discussing their working principles, advantages, and limitations, followed by a qualitative comparative study based on their main ideas, optimization criteria, and performance evaluation parameters. Next, we present a simulation-based quantitative comparison of three representative data-gathering schemes, one from each category. Simulation results are shown in terms of energy efficiency, number of dead nodes, number of exchanged control packets, and packet drop ratio. Finally, lessons learned from the investigation and recommendations made are summarized. MDPI 2021-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8073593/ /pubmed/33923854 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21082829 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Nazib, Rezoan Ahmed Moh, Sangman Sink-Type-Dependent Data-Gathering Frameworks in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comparative Study |
title | Sink-Type-Dependent Data-Gathering Frameworks in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comparative Study |
title_full | Sink-Type-Dependent Data-Gathering Frameworks in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comparative Study |
title_fullStr | Sink-Type-Dependent Data-Gathering Frameworks in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comparative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Sink-Type-Dependent Data-Gathering Frameworks in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comparative Study |
title_short | Sink-Type-Dependent Data-Gathering Frameworks in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Comparative Study |
title_sort | sink-type-dependent data-gathering frameworks in wireless sensor networks: a comparative study |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8073593/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33923854 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21082829 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nazibrezoanahmed sinktypedependentdatagatheringframeworksinwirelesssensornetworksacomparativestudy AT mohsangman sinktypedependentdatagatheringframeworksinwirelesssensornetworksacomparativestudy |