Cargando…
MMR Vaccine Attitude and Uptake Research in the United Kingdom: A Critical Review
This review critically assesses the body of research about Measles-Mumps-and-Rubella (MMR) vaccine attitudes and uptake in the United Kingdom (UK) over the past 10 years. We searched PubMed and Scopus, with terms aimed at capturing relevant literature on attitudes about, and uptake of, the MMR vacci...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8073967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33921593 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9040402 |
_version_ | 1783684250181042176 |
---|---|
author | Torracinta, Louis Tanner, Rachel Vanderslott, Samantha |
author_facet | Torracinta, Louis Tanner, Rachel Vanderslott, Samantha |
author_sort | Torracinta, Louis |
collection | PubMed |
description | This review critically assesses the body of research about Measles-Mumps-and-Rubella (MMR) vaccine attitudes and uptake in the United Kingdom (UK) over the past 10 years. We searched PubMed and Scopus, with terms aimed at capturing relevant literature on attitudes about, and uptake of, the MMR vaccine. Two researchers screened for abstract eligibility and after de-duplication 934 studies were selected. After screening, 40 references were included for full-text review and thematic synthesis by three researchers. We were interested in the methodologies employed and grouped findings by whether studies concerned: (1) Uptake and Demographics; (2) Beliefs and Attitudes; (3) Healthcare Worker Focus; (4) Experimental and Psychometric Intervention; and (5) Mixed Methods. We identified group and individual level determinants for attitudes, operating directly and indirectly, which influence vaccine uptake. We found that access issues, often ignored within the public “anti-vax” debate, remain highly pertinent. Finally, a consistent theme was the effect of misinformation or lack of knowledge and trust in healthcare, often stemming from the Wakefield controversy. Future immunisation campaigns for children, including for COVID-19, should consider both access and attitudinal aspects of vaccination, and incorporate a range of methodologies to assess progress, taking into account socio-economic variables and the needs of disadvantaged groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8073967 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80739672021-04-27 MMR Vaccine Attitude and Uptake Research in the United Kingdom: A Critical Review Torracinta, Louis Tanner, Rachel Vanderslott, Samantha Vaccines (Basel) Review This review critically assesses the body of research about Measles-Mumps-and-Rubella (MMR) vaccine attitudes and uptake in the United Kingdom (UK) over the past 10 years. We searched PubMed and Scopus, with terms aimed at capturing relevant literature on attitudes about, and uptake of, the MMR vaccine. Two researchers screened for abstract eligibility and after de-duplication 934 studies were selected. After screening, 40 references were included for full-text review and thematic synthesis by three researchers. We were interested in the methodologies employed and grouped findings by whether studies concerned: (1) Uptake and Demographics; (2) Beliefs and Attitudes; (3) Healthcare Worker Focus; (4) Experimental and Psychometric Intervention; and (5) Mixed Methods. We identified group and individual level determinants for attitudes, operating directly and indirectly, which influence vaccine uptake. We found that access issues, often ignored within the public “anti-vax” debate, remain highly pertinent. Finally, a consistent theme was the effect of misinformation or lack of knowledge and trust in healthcare, often stemming from the Wakefield controversy. Future immunisation campaigns for children, including for COVID-19, should consider both access and attitudinal aspects of vaccination, and incorporate a range of methodologies to assess progress, taking into account socio-economic variables and the needs of disadvantaged groups. MDPI 2021-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8073967/ /pubmed/33921593 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9040402 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Torracinta, Louis Tanner, Rachel Vanderslott, Samantha MMR Vaccine Attitude and Uptake Research in the United Kingdom: A Critical Review |
title | MMR Vaccine Attitude and Uptake Research in the United Kingdom: A Critical Review |
title_full | MMR Vaccine Attitude and Uptake Research in the United Kingdom: A Critical Review |
title_fullStr | MMR Vaccine Attitude and Uptake Research in the United Kingdom: A Critical Review |
title_full_unstemmed | MMR Vaccine Attitude and Uptake Research in the United Kingdom: A Critical Review |
title_short | MMR Vaccine Attitude and Uptake Research in the United Kingdom: A Critical Review |
title_sort | mmr vaccine attitude and uptake research in the united kingdom: a critical review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8073967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33921593 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9040402 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT torracintalouis mmrvaccineattitudeanduptakeresearchintheunitedkingdomacriticalreview AT tannerrachel mmrvaccineattitudeanduptakeresearchintheunitedkingdomacriticalreview AT vanderslottsamantha mmrvaccineattitudeanduptakeresearchintheunitedkingdomacriticalreview |