Cargando…

MMR Vaccine Attitude and Uptake Research in the United Kingdom: A Critical Review

This review critically assesses the body of research about Measles-Mumps-and-Rubella (MMR) vaccine attitudes and uptake in the United Kingdom (UK) over the past 10 years. We searched PubMed and Scopus, with terms aimed at capturing relevant literature on attitudes about, and uptake of, the MMR vacci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Torracinta, Louis, Tanner, Rachel, Vanderslott, Samantha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8073967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33921593
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9040402
_version_ 1783684250181042176
author Torracinta, Louis
Tanner, Rachel
Vanderslott, Samantha
author_facet Torracinta, Louis
Tanner, Rachel
Vanderslott, Samantha
author_sort Torracinta, Louis
collection PubMed
description This review critically assesses the body of research about Measles-Mumps-and-Rubella (MMR) vaccine attitudes and uptake in the United Kingdom (UK) over the past 10 years. We searched PubMed and Scopus, with terms aimed at capturing relevant literature on attitudes about, and uptake of, the MMR vaccine. Two researchers screened for abstract eligibility and after de-duplication 934 studies were selected. After screening, 40 references were included for full-text review and thematic synthesis by three researchers. We were interested in the methodologies employed and grouped findings by whether studies concerned: (1) Uptake and Demographics; (2) Beliefs and Attitudes; (3) Healthcare Worker Focus; (4) Experimental and Psychometric Intervention; and (5) Mixed Methods. We identified group and individual level determinants for attitudes, operating directly and indirectly, which influence vaccine uptake. We found that access issues, often ignored within the public “anti-vax” debate, remain highly pertinent. Finally, a consistent theme was the effect of misinformation or lack of knowledge and trust in healthcare, often stemming from the Wakefield controversy. Future immunisation campaigns for children, including for COVID-19, should consider both access and attitudinal aspects of vaccination, and incorporate a range of methodologies to assess progress, taking into account socio-economic variables and the needs of disadvantaged groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8073967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80739672021-04-27 MMR Vaccine Attitude and Uptake Research in the United Kingdom: A Critical Review Torracinta, Louis Tanner, Rachel Vanderslott, Samantha Vaccines (Basel) Review This review critically assesses the body of research about Measles-Mumps-and-Rubella (MMR) vaccine attitudes and uptake in the United Kingdom (UK) over the past 10 years. We searched PubMed and Scopus, with terms aimed at capturing relevant literature on attitudes about, and uptake of, the MMR vaccine. Two researchers screened for abstract eligibility and after de-duplication 934 studies were selected. After screening, 40 references were included for full-text review and thematic synthesis by three researchers. We were interested in the methodologies employed and grouped findings by whether studies concerned: (1) Uptake and Demographics; (2) Beliefs and Attitudes; (3) Healthcare Worker Focus; (4) Experimental and Psychometric Intervention; and (5) Mixed Methods. We identified group and individual level determinants for attitudes, operating directly and indirectly, which influence vaccine uptake. We found that access issues, often ignored within the public “anti-vax” debate, remain highly pertinent. Finally, a consistent theme was the effect of misinformation or lack of knowledge and trust in healthcare, often stemming from the Wakefield controversy. Future immunisation campaigns for children, including for COVID-19, should consider both access and attitudinal aspects of vaccination, and incorporate a range of methodologies to assess progress, taking into account socio-economic variables and the needs of disadvantaged groups. MDPI 2021-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8073967/ /pubmed/33921593 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9040402 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Torracinta, Louis
Tanner, Rachel
Vanderslott, Samantha
MMR Vaccine Attitude and Uptake Research in the United Kingdom: A Critical Review
title MMR Vaccine Attitude and Uptake Research in the United Kingdom: A Critical Review
title_full MMR Vaccine Attitude and Uptake Research in the United Kingdom: A Critical Review
title_fullStr MMR Vaccine Attitude and Uptake Research in the United Kingdom: A Critical Review
title_full_unstemmed MMR Vaccine Attitude and Uptake Research in the United Kingdom: A Critical Review
title_short MMR Vaccine Attitude and Uptake Research in the United Kingdom: A Critical Review
title_sort mmr vaccine attitude and uptake research in the united kingdom: a critical review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8073967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33921593
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9040402
work_keys_str_mv AT torracintalouis mmrvaccineattitudeanduptakeresearchintheunitedkingdomacriticalreview
AT tannerrachel mmrvaccineattitudeanduptakeresearchintheunitedkingdomacriticalreview
AT vanderslottsamantha mmrvaccineattitudeanduptakeresearchintheunitedkingdomacriticalreview