Cargando…

Interrupted sutures prevent recurrent abdominal fascial dehiscence: a comparative retrospective single center cohort analysis of risk factors of burst abdomen and its recurrence as well as surgical repair techniques

BACKGROUND: Burst abdomen (BA) is a severe complication after abdominal surgery, which often requires urgent repair. However, evidence on surgical techniques to prevent burst abdomen recurrence (BAR) is scarce. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with BA comparing them to pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mehdorn, Matthias, Groos, Linda, Kassahun, Woubet, Jansen-Winkeln, Boris, Gockel, Ines, Moulla, Yusef
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8074409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33902549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01219-x
_version_ 1783684347965997056
author Mehdorn, Matthias
Groos, Linda
Kassahun, Woubet
Jansen-Winkeln, Boris
Gockel, Ines
Moulla, Yusef
author_facet Mehdorn, Matthias
Groos, Linda
Kassahun, Woubet
Jansen-Winkeln, Boris
Gockel, Ines
Moulla, Yusef
author_sort Mehdorn, Matthias
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Burst abdomen (BA) is a severe complication after abdominal surgery, which often requires urgent repair. However, evidence on surgical techniques to prevent burst abdomen recurrence (BAR) is scarce. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with BA comparing them to patients with superficial surgical site infections from the years 2015 to 2018. The data was retrieved from the institutional wound register. We analyzed risk factors for BA occurrence as well as its recurrence after BA repair and surgical closure techniques that would best prevent BAR. RESULTS: We included 504 patients in the analysis, 111 of those suffered from BA. We found intestinal resection (OR 172.510; 22.195–1340.796, p < 0.001), liver cirrhosis (OR 4.788; 2.034–11.269, p < 0.001) and emergency surgery (OR 1.658; 1.050–2.617; p = 0.03) as well as postoperative delirium (OR 5.058; 1.349–18.965, p = 0.016) as the main predictor for developing BA. The main reason for BA was superficial surgical site infection (40.7%). 110 patients received operative revision of the abdominal fascial dehiscence and 108 were eligible for BAR analysis with 14 cases of BAR. Again, post-operative delirium was the patient-related predictor for BAR (OR 13.73; 95% CI 1.812–104-023, p = 0.011). The surgical technique of using interrupted sutures opposed to continuous sutures showed a preventive effect on BAR (OR 0.143, 95% CI 0.026–0,784, p = 0.025). The implantation of an absorbable IPOM mesh did not reduce BAR, but it did reduce the necessity of BAR revision significantly. CONCLUSION: The use of interrupted sutures together with the implantation of an intraabdominal mesh in burst abdomen repair helps to reduce BAR and the need for additional revision surgeries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8074409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80744092021-04-26 Interrupted sutures prevent recurrent abdominal fascial dehiscence: a comparative retrospective single center cohort analysis of risk factors of burst abdomen and its recurrence as well as surgical repair techniques Mehdorn, Matthias Groos, Linda Kassahun, Woubet Jansen-Winkeln, Boris Gockel, Ines Moulla, Yusef BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Burst abdomen (BA) is a severe complication after abdominal surgery, which often requires urgent repair. However, evidence on surgical techniques to prevent burst abdomen recurrence (BAR) is scarce. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with BA comparing them to patients with superficial surgical site infections from the years 2015 to 2018. The data was retrieved from the institutional wound register. We analyzed risk factors for BA occurrence as well as its recurrence after BA repair and surgical closure techniques that would best prevent BAR. RESULTS: We included 504 patients in the analysis, 111 of those suffered from BA. We found intestinal resection (OR 172.510; 22.195–1340.796, p < 0.001), liver cirrhosis (OR 4.788; 2.034–11.269, p < 0.001) and emergency surgery (OR 1.658; 1.050–2.617; p = 0.03) as well as postoperative delirium (OR 5.058; 1.349–18.965, p = 0.016) as the main predictor for developing BA. The main reason for BA was superficial surgical site infection (40.7%). 110 patients received operative revision of the abdominal fascial dehiscence and 108 were eligible for BAR analysis with 14 cases of BAR. Again, post-operative delirium was the patient-related predictor for BAR (OR 13.73; 95% CI 1.812–104-023, p = 0.011). The surgical technique of using interrupted sutures opposed to continuous sutures showed a preventive effect on BAR (OR 0.143, 95% CI 0.026–0,784, p = 0.025). The implantation of an absorbable IPOM mesh did not reduce BAR, but it did reduce the necessity of BAR revision significantly. CONCLUSION: The use of interrupted sutures together with the implantation of an intraabdominal mesh in burst abdomen repair helps to reduce BAR and the need for additional revision surgeries. BioMed Central 2021-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8074409/ /pubmed/33902549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01219-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mehdorn, Matthias
Groos, Linda
Kassahun, Woubet
Jansen-Winkeln, Boris
Gockel, Ines
Moulla, Yusef
Interrupted sutures prevent recurrent abdominal fascial dehiscence: a comparative retrospective single center cohort analysis of risk factors of burst abdomen and its recurrence as well as surgical repair techniques
title Interrupted sutures prevent recurrent abdominal fascial dehiscence: a comparative retrospective single center cohort analysis of risk factors of burst abdomen and its recurrence as well as surgical repair techniques
title_full Interrupted sutures prevent recurrent abdominal fascial dehiscence: a comparative retrospective single center cohort analysis of risk factors of burst abdomen and its recurrence as well as surgical repair techniques
title_fullStr Interrupted sutures prevent recurrent abdominal fascial dehiscence: a comparative retrospective single center cohort analysis of risk factors of burst abdomen and its recurrence as well as surgical repair techniques
title_full_unstemmed Interrupted sutures prevent recurrent abdominal fascial dehiscence: a comparative retrospective single center cohort analysis of risk factors of burst abdomen and its recurrence as well as surgical repair techniques
title_short Interrupted sutures prevent recurrent abdominal fascial dehiscence: a comparative retrospective single center cohort analysis of risk factors of burst abdomen and its recurrence as well as surgical repair techniques
title_sort interrupted sutures prevent recurrent abdominal fascial dehiscence: a comparative retrospective single center cohort analysis of risk factors of burst abdomen and its recurrence as well as surgical repair techniques
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8074409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33902549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01219-x
work_keys_str_mv AT mehdornmatthias interruptedsuturespreventrecurrentabdominalfascialdehiscenceacomparativeretrospectivesinglecentercohortanalysisofriskfactorsofburstabdomenanditsrecurrenceaswellassurgicalrepairtechniques
AT grooslinda interruptedsuturespreventrecurrentabdominalfascialdehiscenceacomparativeretrospectivesinglecentercohortanalysisofriskfactorsofburstabdomenanditsrecurrenceaswellassurgicalrepairtechniques
AT kassahunwoubet interruptedsuturespreventrecurrentabdominalfascialdehiscenceacomparativeretrospectivesinglecentercohortanalysisofriskfactorsofburstabdomenanditsrecurrenceaswellassurgicalrepairtechniques
AT jansenwinkelnboris interruptedsuturespreventrecurrentabdominalfascialdehiscenceacomparativeretrospectivesinglecentercohortanalysisofriskfactorsofburstabdomenanditsrecurrenceaswellassurgicalrepairtechniques
AT gockelines interruptedsuturespreventrecurrentabdominalfascialdehiscenceacomparativeretrospectivesinglecentercohortanalysisofriskfactorsofburstabdomenanditsrecurrenceaswellassurgicalrepairtechniques
AT moullayusef interruptedsuturespreventrecurrentabdominalfascialdehiscenceacomparativeretrospectivesinglecentercohortanalysisofriskfactorsofburstabdomenanditsrecurrenceaswellassurgicalrepairtechniques