Cargando…

Comparative cost analysis of cervical cancer screening programme based on molecular detection of HPV in Spain

BACKGROUND: HPV cervical cancer screening (CCS) must use validated HPV tests based on the molecular detection of either viral mRNA (Aptima HPV Assay—AHPV) or DNA. AHPV has demonstrated the same cross-sectional and longitudinal sensitivity for the detection of HSIL/CIN2+ lesions but with greater spec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ibáñez, R., Mareque, M., Granados, R., Andía, D., García-Rojo, M., Quílez, J. C., Oyagüez, I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8074415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33902553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01310-8
_version_ 1783684348928589824
author Ibáñez, R.
Mareque, M.
Granados, R.
Andía, D.
García-Rojo, M.
Quílez, J. C.
Oyagüez, I.
author_facet Ibáñez, R.
Mareque, M.
Granados, R.
Andía, D.
García-Rojo, M.
Quílez, J. C.
Oyagüez, I.
author_sort Ibáñez, R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: HPV cervical cancer screening (CCS) must use validated HPV tests based on the molecular detection of either viral mRNA (Aptima HPV Assay—AHPV) or DNA. AHPV has demonstrated the same cross-sectional and longitudinal sensitivity for the detection of HSIL/CIN2+ lesions but with greater specificity than HPV-DNA tests. The study aimed to estimate the total costs of a CCS with a primary HPV test based on the detection of mRNA compared to DNA in women aged 35–65 years for the National Health System. METHODS: A decision-tree-based model to estimate the cost of the CCS until the first colposcopy was designed based on Spanish CCS guidelines. The total cost (€, 2019) for CCS with AHPV or DNA tests (HC2 and Cobas) was calculated, including HPV test, liquid-based cytology (LBC) and colposcopy, for a population of 7,263,529 women aged 35–65 years (assuming 70% coverage). Clinical inputs derived from a literature review were validated by a multidisciplinary expert panel. Data from head-to-head studies between different HPV tests were selected. RESULTS: The use of AHPV showed reduction of 290,541 (− 35%) and 355,913 (− 40%) LBC compared to HC2 or Cobas, respectively. Furthermore, AHPV avoided 151,699 (− 47%) colposcopies versus HC2 and 151,165 (− 47%) versus Cobas. The total cost of CCS was € 282,747,877 with AHPV, € 322,587,588 with HC2 and € 324,614,490 with Cobas. Therefore, AHPV savings € − 39,839,711 versus HC2 and € − 41,866,613 versus Cobas. CONCLUSIONS: Assuming that 70% of women from 35 to 65 years attend the CCS programme, the cost of screening up to the first colposcopy using AHPV would provide cost savings of up to € 41.9 million versus DNA tests in Spain. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-021-01310-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8074415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80744152021-04-26 Comparative cost analysis of cervical cancer screening programme based on molecular detection of HPV in Spain Ibáñez, R. Mareque, M. Granados, R. Andía, D. García-Rojo, M. Quílez, J. C. Oyagüez, I. BMC Womens Health Research Article BACKGROUND: HPV cervical cancer screening (CCS) must use validated HPV tests based on the molecular detection of either viral mRNA (Aptima HPV Assay—AHPV) or DNA. AHPV has demonstrated the same cross-sectional and longitudinal sensitivity for the detection of HSIL/CIN2+ lesions but with greater specificity than HPV-DNA tests. The study aimed to estimate the total costs of a CCS with a primary HPV test based on the detection of mRNA compared to DNA in women aged 35–65 years for the National Health System. METHODS: A decision-tree-based model to estimate the cost of the CCS until the first colposcopy was designed based on Spanish CCS guidelines. The total cost (€, 2019) for CCS with AHPV or DNA tests (HC2 and Cobas) was calculated, including HPV test, liquid-based cytology (LBC) and colposcopy, for a population of 7,263,529 women aged 35–65 years (assuming 70% coverage). Clinical inputs derived from a literature review were validated by a multidisciplinary expert panel. Data from head-to-head studies between different HPV tests were selected. RESULTS: The use of AHPV showed reduction of 290,541 (− 35%) and 355,913 (− 40%) LBC compared to HC2 or Cobas, respectively. Furthermore, AHPV avoided 151,699 (− 47%) colposcopies versus HC2 and 151,165 (− 47%) versus Cobas. The total cost of CCS was € 282,747,877 with AHPV, € 322,587,588 with HC2 and € 324,614,490 with Cobas. Therefore, AHPV savings € − 39,839,711 versus HC2 and € − 41,866,613 versus Cobas. CONCLUSIONS: Assuming that 70% of women from 35 to 65 years attend the CCS programme, the cost of screening up to the first colposcopy using AHPV would provide cost savings of up to € 41.9 million versus DNA tests in Spain. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-021-01310-8. BioMed Central 2021-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8074415/ /pubmed/33902553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01310-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ibáñez, R.
Mareque, M.
Granados, R.
Andía, D.
García-Rojo, M.
Quílez, J. C.
Oyagüez, I.
Comparative cost analysis of cervical cancer screening programme based on molecular detection of HPV in Spain
title Comparative cost analysis of cervical cancer screening programme based on molecular detection of HPV in Spain
title_full Comparative cost analysis of cervical cancer screening programme based on molecular detection of HPV in Spain
title_fullStr Comparative cost analysis of cervical cancer screening programme based on molecular detection of HPV in Spain
title_full_unstemmed Comparative cost analysis of cervical cancer screening programme based on molecular detection of HPV in Spain
title_short Comparative cost analysis of cervical cancer screening programme based on molecular detection of HPV in Spain
title_sort comparative cost analysis of cervical cancer screening programme based on molecular detection of hpv in spain
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8074415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33902553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01310-8
work_keys_str_mv AT ibanezr comparativecostanalysisofcervicalcancerscreeningprogrammebasedonmoleculardetectionofhpvinspain
AT marequem comparativecostanalysisofcervicalcancerscreeningprogrammebasedonmoleculardetectionofhpvinspain
AT granadosr comparativecostanalysisofcervicalcancerscreeningprogrammebasedonmoleculardetectionofhpvinspain
AT andiad comparativecostanalysisofcervicalcancerscreeningprogrammebasedonmoleculardetectionofhpvinspain
AT garciarojom comparativecostanalysisofcervicalcancerscreeningprogrammebasedonmoleculardetectionofhpvinspain
AT quilezjc comparativecostanalysisofcervicalcancerscreeningprogrammebasedonmoleculardetectionofhpvinspain
AT oyaguezi comparativecostanalysisofcervicalcancerscreeningprogrammebasedonmoleculardetectionofhpvinspain