Cargando…

Optimizing heartworm diagnosis in dogs using multiple test combinations

BACKGROUND: Various heartworm (HW) diagnostic testing modalities detect products of, or reactions to, different life cycle stages of Dirofilaria immitis. Microfilariae (Mf) can be directly visualized in blood, antigen (Ag) from immature and adult heartworms may be detected on commercial assays, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lane, Jennifer N., Litster, Annette, Little, Susan E., Rodriguez, Jessica Y., Mwacalimba, Kennedy K., Sundstrom, Kellee D., Amirian, E. Susan, Guerios, Simone D., Serrano, Maria A., Hays, Kellie M., Levy, Julie K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8074442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33902687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04715-4
_version_ 1783684353908277248
author Lane, Jennifer N.
Litster, Annette
Little, Susan E.
Rodriguez, Jessica Y.
Mwacalimba, Kennedy K.
Sundstrom, Kellee D.
Amirian, E. Susan
Guerios, Simone D.
Serrano, Maria A.
Hays, Kellie M.
Levy, Julie K.
author_facet Lane, Jennifer N.
Litster, Annette
Little, Susan E.
Rodriguez, Jessica Y.
Mwacalimba, Kennedy K.
Sundstrom, Kellee D.
Amirian, E. Susan
Guerios, Simone D.
Serrano, Maria A.
Hays, Kellie M.
Levy, Julie K.
author_sort Lane, Jennifer N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Various heartworm (HW) diagnostic testing modalities detect products of, or reactions to, different life cycle stages of Dirofilaria immitis. Microfilariae (Mf) can be directly visualized in blood, antigen (Ag) from immature and adult heartworms may be detected on commercial assays, and antibody (Ab) tests detect the host immune response to larval stages. Ag and Mf tests are commonly used in dogs, which frequently carry adult HW infections, but Ab tests have only been validated for use in cats. In some HW-infected dogs, Ag is blocked by immune complexing leading to false-negative results. Heat-treatment (HT) to disrupt these complexes can increase the sensitivity of HW Ag tests. The aim of this study was to compare different methods for diagnosing HW infection in dogs at high risk using individual and paired diagnostic tests, including an exploration of using Ab tests designed for cats to test canine samples. METHODS: One hundred stray adult (≥ 2-year-old) dogs in Florida shelters were tested using Mf, HW Ag, and HW Ab tests (feline HW Ab tests currently not commercially validated/approved for use in dogs); two versions of each test platform were used. RESULTS: Fourteen dogs tested positive using point-of-care (POC) Ag tests; an additional 2 dogs tested positive with microtiter well assay, and an additional 12 dogs tested positive using HT Ag testing. For individual tests, Ag test sensitivity/specificity compared to HT Ag was 50–57%/100%, and Ab tests were 46–64%/82–94%. Sensitivity estimates for individual tests were higher when comparing to non-HT Ag. Pairing POC Ag tests with Mf tests improved sensitivity without loss of specificity, while pairing POC Ag and Ab tests modestly increased sensitivity at the expense of specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Screening dogs for HW infection using both POC Ag and Mf detection, which is recommended by the American Heartworm Society, improved diagnostic performance in this study compared to single Ag test use, but may have missed more than one in four infected dogs. The need to improve access to highly accurate, rapid, and inexpensive large-scale HW testing for dogs in animal shelters remains largely unmet by current testing availability. The development of practical and validated protocols that incorporate heat or chemical treatment to disrupt Ag-Ab complexes in POC testing or decreasing the cost and time required for such testing in reference laboratories might provide solutions to this unmet need. Similar studies performed in countries where the prevalence of parasites such as D. repens or A. vasorum is different to the USA could potentially yield very different positive predictive values for both HT and non-HT Ag tests. GRAPHIC ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8074442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80744422021-04-26 Optimizing heartworm diagnosis in dogs using multiple test combinations Lane, Jennifer N. Litster, Annette Little, Susan E. Rodriguez, Jessica Y. Mwacalimba, Kennedy K. Sundstrom, Kellee D. Amirian, E. Susan Guerios, Simone D. Serrano, Maria A. Hays, Kellie M. Levy, Julie K. Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Various heartworm (HW) diagnostic testing modalities detect products of, or reactions to, different life cycle stages of Dirofilaria immitis. Microfilariae (Mf) can be directly visualized in blood, antigen (Ag) from immature and adult heartworms may be detected on commercial assays, and antibody (Ab) tests detect the host immune response to larval stages. Ag and Mf tests are commonly used in dogs, which frequently carry adult HW infections, but Ab tests have only been validated for use in cats. In some HW-infected dogs, Ag is blocked by immune complexing leading to false-negative results. Heat-treatment (HT) to disrupt these complexes can increase the sensitivity of HW Ag tests. The aim of this study was to compare different methods for diagnosing HW infection in dogs at high risk using individual and paired diagnostic tests, including an exploration of using Ab tests designed for cats to test canine samples. METHODS: One hundred stray adult (≥ 2-year-old) dogs in Florida shelters were tested using Mf, HW Ag, and HW Ab tests (feline HW Ab tests currently not commercially validated/approved for use in dogs); two versions of each test platform were used. RESULTS: Fourteen dogs tested positive using point-of-care (POC) Ag tests; an additional 2 dogs tested positive with microtiter well assay, and an additional 12 dogs tested positive using HT Ag testing. For individual tests, Ag test sensitivity/specificity compared to HT Ag was 50–57%/100%, and Ab tests were 46–64%/82–94%. Sensitivity estimates for individual tests were higher when comparing to non-HT Ag. Pairing POC Ag tests with Mf tests improved sensitivity without loss of specificity, while pairing POC Ag and Ab tests modestly increased sensitivity at the expense of specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Screening dogs for HW infection using both POC Ag and Mf detection, which is recommended by the American Heartworm Society, improved diagnostic performance in this study compared to single Ag test use, but may have missed more than one in four infected dogs. The need to improve access to highly accurate, rapid, and inexpensive large-scale HW testing for dogs in animal shelters remains largely unmet by current testing availability. The development of practical and validated protocols that incorporate heat or chemical treatment to disrupt Ag-Ab complexes in POC testing or decreasing the cost and time required for such testing in reference laboratories might provide solutions to this unmet need. Similar studies performed in countries where the prevalence of parasites such as D. repens or A. vasorum is different to the USA could potentially yield very different positive predictive values for both HT and non-HT Ag tests. GRAPHIC ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] BioMed Central 2021-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8074442/ /pubmed/33902687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04715-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lane, Jennifer N.
Litster, Annette
Little, Susan E.
Rodriguez, Jessica Y.
Mwacalimba, Kennedy K.
Sundstrom, Kellee D.
Amirian, E. Susan
Guerios, Simone D.
Serrano, Maria A.
Hays, Kellie M.
Levy, Julie K.
Optimizing heartworm diagnosis in dogs using multiple test combinations
title Optimizing heartworm diagnosis in dogs using multiple test combinations
title_full Optimizing heartworm diagnosis in dogs using multiple test combinations
title_fullStr Optimizing heartworm diagnosis in dogs using multiple test combinations
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing heartworm diagnosis in dogs using multiple test combinations
title_short Optimizing heartworm diagnosis in dogs using multiple test combinations
title_sort optimizing heartworm diagnosis in dogs using multiple test combinations
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8074442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33902687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04715-4
work_keys_str_mv AT lanejennifern optimizingheartwormdiagnosisindogsusingmultipletestcombinations
AT litsterannette optimizingheartwormdiagnosisindogsusingmultipletestcombinations
AT littlesusane optimizingheartwormdiagnosisindogsusingmultipletestcombinations
AT rodriguezjessicay optimizingheartwormdiagnosisindogsusingmultipletestcombinations
AT mwacalimbakennedyk optimizingheartwormdiagnosisindogsusingmultipletestcombinations
AT sundstromkelleed optimizingheartwormdiagnosisindogsusingmultipletestcombinations
AT amirianesusan optimizingheartwormdiagnosisindogsusingmultipletestcombinations
AT gueriossimoned optimizingheartwormdiagnosisindogsusingmultipletestcombinations
AT serranomariaa optimizingheartwormdiagnosisindogsusingmultipletestcombinations
AT hayskelliem optimizingheartwormdiagnosisindogsusingmultipletestcombinations
AT levyjuliek optimizingheartwormdiagnosisindogsusingmultipletestcombinations