Cargando…

A Q methodology study on divergent perspectives on CRISPR-Cas9 in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND: CRISPR-Cas9, a technology enabling modification of the human genome, is developing rapidly. There have been calls for public debate to discuss its ethics, societal implications, and governance. So far, however, little is known about public attitudes on CRISPR-Cas9. This study contributes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schuijff, Mirjam, De Jong, Menno D. T., Dijkstra, Anne M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8074506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33902573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00615-5
_version_ 1783684366919008256
author Schuijff, Mirjam
De Jong, Menno D. T.
Dijkstra, Anne M.
author_facet Schuijff, Mirjam
De Jong, Menno D. T.
Dijkstra, Anne M.
author_sort Schuijff, Mirjam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: CRISPR-Cas9, a technology enabling modification of the human genome, is developing rapidly. There have been calls for public debate to discuss its ethics, societal implications, and governance. So far, however, little is known about public attitudes on CRISPR-Cas9. This study contributes to a better understanding of public perspectives by exploring the various holistic perspectives Dutch citizens have on CRISPR-Cas9. METHODS: This study used Q methodology to identify different perspectives of Dutch citizens (N = 30) on the use of CRISPR-Cas9. The Q-sort method aims at segmenting audiences based on the structural characteristics of their perspectives. Participants individually ranked 32 statements about CRISPR-Cas9 and discussed their rankings in small groups. By-person factor analysis was performed using PQMethod. Participants’ contributions to the discussions were used to further make sense of the audience segments identified. RESULTS: Five perspectives on CRISPR-Cas9 were identified: (1) pragmatic optimism (2) concerned scepticism; (3) normative optimism; (4) enthusiastic support; and (5) benevolent generalism. Each perspective represents a unique position motivated by different ranking rationales. Sorting rationales included improving health, preventing negative impacts on society, and fear of a slippery slope. Overall, there is broad, but not universal support for medical uses of CRISPR-Cas9. CONCLUSIONS: Research on CRISPR-Cas9 should prioritise the broadly supported applications of the technology. Research and public debates on CRISPR-Cas9, its uses, its broader implications, and the governance of CRISPR-Cas9 are recommended. A discourse that includes all perspectives can contribute to the embedding of future uses of CRISPR-Cas9 in society. This study shows that Q methodology followed by group discussions enables citizens to contribute meaningfully to discourses about research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-021-00615-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8074506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80745062021-04-26 A Q methodology study on divergent perspectives on CRISPR-Cas9 in the Netherlands Schuijff, Mirjam De Jong, Menno D. T. Dijkstra, Anne M. BMC Med Ethics Research BACKGROUND: CRISPR-Cas9, a technology enabling modification of the human genome, is developing rapidly. There have been calls for public debate to discuss its ethics, societal implications, and governance. So far, however, little is known about public attitudes on CRISPR-Cas9. This study contributes to a better understanding of public perspectives by exploring the various holistic perspectives Dutch citizens have on CRISPR-Cas9. METHODS: This study used Q methodology to identify different perspectives of Dutch citizens (N = 30) on the use of CRISPR-Cas9. The Q-sort method aims at segmenting audiences based on the structural characteristics of their perspectives. Participants individually ranked 32 statements about CRISPR-Cas9 and discussed their rankings in small groups. By-person factor analysis was performed using PQMethod. Participants’ contributions to the discussions were used to further make sense of the audience segments identified. RESULTS: Five perspectives on CRISPR-Cas9 were identified: (1) pragmatic optimism (2) concerned scepticism; (3) normative optimism; (4) enthusiastic support; and (5) benevolent generalism. Each perspective represents a unique position motivated by different ranking rationales. Sorting rationales included improving health, preventing negative impacts on society, and fear of a slippery slope. Overall, there is broad, but not universal support for medical uses of CRISPR-Cas9. CONCLUSIONS: Research on CRISPR-Cas9 should prioritise the broadly supported applications of the technology. Research and public debates on CRISPR-Cas9, its uses, its broader implications, and the governance of CRISPR-Cas9 are recommended. A discourse that includes all perspectives can contribute to the embedding of future uses of CRISPR-Cas9 in society. This study shows that Q methodology followed by group discussions enables citizens to contribute meaningfully to discourses about research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-021-00615-5. BioMed Central 2021-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8074506/ /pubmed/33902573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00615-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Schuijff, Mirjam
De Jong, Menno D. T.
Dijkstra, Anne M.
A Q methodology study on divergent perspectives on CRISPR-Cas9 in the Netherlands
title A Q methodology study on divergent perspectives on CRISPR-Cas9 in the Netherlands
title_full A Q methodology study on divergent perspectives on CRISPR-Cas9 in the Netherlands
title_fullStr A Q methodology study on divergent perspectives on CRISPR-Cas9 in the Netherlands
title_full_unstemmed A Q methodology study on divergent perspectives on CRISPR-Cas9 in the Netherlands
title_short A Q methodology study on divergent perspectives on CRISPR-Cas9 in the Netherlands
title_sort q methodology study on divergent perspectives on crispr-cas9 in the netherlands
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8074506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33902573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00615-5
work_keys_str_mv AT schuijffmirjam aqmethodologystudyondivergentperspectivesoncrisprcas9inthenetherlands
AT dejongmennodt aqmethodologystudyondivergentperspectivesoncrisprcas9inthenetherlands
AT dijkstraannem aqmethodologystudyondivergentperspectivesoncrisprcas9inthenetherlands
AT schuijffmirjam qmethodologystudyondivergentperspectivesoncrisprcas9inthenetherlands
AT dejongmennodt qmethodologystudyondivergentperspectivesoncrisprcas9inthenetherlands
AT dijkstraannem qmethodologystudyondivergentperspectivesoncrisprcas9inthenetherlands