Cargando…

Acceptability of intravitreal injections in geographic atrophy: protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study

INTRODUCTION: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a common cause of visual impairment, affecting central vision. Geographic atrophy (GA) is an advanced form of the non-neovascular (dry) type of AMD. Late-stage clinical trials suggest that intravitreal injections of novel therapeutics may slow...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Enoch, Jamie, Ghulakhszian, Arevik, Crabb, David P, Dinah, Christiana, Taylor, Deanna J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8074551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33895721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049495
_version_ 1783684373025914880
author Enoch, Jamie
Ghulakhszian, Arevik
Crabb, David P
Dinah, Christiana
Taylor, Deanna J
author_facet Enoch, Jamie
Ghulakhszian, Arevik
Crabb, David P
Dinah, Christiana
Taylor, Deanna J
author_sort Enoch, Jamie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a common cause of visual impairment, affecting central vision. Geographic atrophy (GA) is an advanced form of the non-neovascular (dry) type of AMD. Late-stage clinical trials suggest that intravitreal injections of novel therapeutics may slow down the rate of GA progression by up to 30% in 1 year, thus allowing people with GA to preserve central vision for a longer period. While intravitreal injections have become an established treatment modality for neovascular (wet) AMD, it is unknown whether patients with (more gradually progressing) GA would accept regular injections that slow down, but do not stop or reverse, vision loss. Therefore, this mixed-methods pilot study will aim to explore whether regular intravitreal injections will be acceptable as treatment for patients with GA, and the factors that may affect treatment acceptability. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A mixed-methods survey has been designed in collaboration with a GA patient advisory group. The survey comprises of structured questionnaires, semi-structured interview questions regarding patients’ perceptions of intravitreal injections and the burden of treatment, and a task eliciting preferences between different potential treatments. Due to COVID-19 restrictions, this study will be conducted remotely by telephone. Thirty individuals will be recruited from NHS Medical Retina clinics at Central Middlesex Hospital, London. Half of the participants will be naïve to intravitreal injections, while half will have previous experience of intravitreal injections for neovascular (wet) AMD. Qualitative data analysis will be conducted using the Framework Method of analysis to identify key themes from participants’ accounts. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study received Health Research Authority approval on 23 March 2021 (IRAS Project ID: 287824). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations to the medical retina community, as well as through dialogue with patients and macular disease charities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8074551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80745512021-05-11 Acceptability of intravitreal injections in geographic atrophy: protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study Enoch, Jamie Ghulakhszian, Arevik Crabb, David P Dinah, Christiana Taylor, Deanna J BMJ Open Ophthalmology INTRODUCTION: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a common cause of visual impairment, affecting central vision. Geographic atrophy (GA) is an advanced form of the non-neovascular (dry) type of AMD. Late-stage clinical trials suggest that intravitreal injections of novel therapeutics may slow down the rate of GA progression by up to 30% in 1 year, thus allowing people with GA to preserve central vision for a longer period. While intravitreal injections have become an established treatment modality for neovascular (wet) AMD, it is unknown whether patients with (more gradually progressing) GA would accept regular injections that slow down, but do not stop or reverse, vision loss. Therefore, this mixed-methods pilot study will aim to explore whether regular intravitreal injections will be acceptable as treatment for patients with GA, and the factors that may affect treatment acceptability. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A mixed-methods survey has been designed in collaboration with a GA patient advisory group. The survey comprises of structured questionnaires, semi-structured interview questions regarding patients’ perceptions of intravitreal injections and the burden of treatment, and a task eliciting preferences between different potential treatments. Due to COVID-19 restrictions, this study will be conducted remotely by telephone. Thirty individuals will be recruited from NHS Medical Retina clinics at Central Middlesex Hospital, London. Half of the participants will be naïve to intravitreal injections, while half will have previous experience of intravitreal injections for neovascular (wet) AMD. Qualitative data analysis will be conducted using the Framework Method of analysis to identify key themes from participants’ accounts. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study received Health Research Authority approval on 23 March 2021 (IRAS Project ID: 287824). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations to the medical retina community, as well as through dialogue with patients and macular disease charities. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8074551/ /pubmed/33895721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049495 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Ophthalmology
Enoch, Jamie
Ghulakhszian, Arevik
Crabb, David P
Dinah, Christiana
Taylor, Deanna J
Acceptability of intravitreal injections in geographic atrophy: protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study
title Acceptability of intravitreal injections in geographic atrophy: protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study
title_full Acceptability of intravitreal injections in geographic atrophy: protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study
title_fullStr Acceptability of intravitreal injections in geographic atrophy: protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Acceptability of intravitreal injections in geographic atrophy: protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study
title_short Acceptability of intravitreal injections in geographic atrophy: protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study
title_sort acceptability of intravitreal injections in geographic atrophy: protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study
topic Ophthalmology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8074551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33895721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049495
work_keys_str_mv AT enochjamie acceptabilityofintravitrealinjectionsingeographicatrophyprotocolforamixedmethodspilotstudy
AT ghulakhszianarevik acceptabilityofintravitrealinjectionsingeographicatrophyprotocolforamixedmethodspilotstudy
AT crabbdavidp acceptabilityofintravitrealinjectionsingeographicatrophyprotocolforamixedmethodspilotstudy
AT dinahchristiana acceptabilityofintravitrealinjectionsingeographicatrophyprotocolforamixedmethodspilotstudy
AT taylordeannaj acceptabilityofintravitrealinjectionsingeographicatrophyprotocolforamixedmethodspilotstudy