Cargando…

Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making and Sensitivity Analysis for Selection of Materials for Knee Implant Femoral Component

Total knee replacement (TKR) is a remarkable achievement in biomedical science that enhances human life. However, human beings still suffer from knee-joint-related problems such as aseptic loosening caused by excessive wear between articular surfaces, stress-shielding of the bone by prosthesis, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Raman, Dubey, Rohit, Singh, Sehijpal, Singh, Sunpreet, Prakash, Chander, Nirsanametla, Yadaiah, Królczyk, Grzegorz, Chudy, Roman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8074616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33924189
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14082084
_version_ 1783684386641674240
author Kumar, Raman
Dubey, Rohit
Singh, Sehijpal
Singh, Sunpreet
Prakash, Chander
Nirsanametla, Yadaiah
Królczyk, Grzegorz
Chudy, Roman
author_facet Kumar, Raman
Dubey, Rohit
Singh, Sehijpal
Singh, Sunpreet
Prakash, Chander
Nirsanametla, Yadaiah
Królczyk, Grzegorz
Chudy, Roman
author_sort Kumar, Raman
collection PubMed
description Total knee replacement (TKR) is a remarkable achievement in biomedical science that enhances human life. However, human beings still suffer from knee-joint-related problems such as aseptic loosening caused by excessive wear between articular surfaces, stress-shielding of the bone by prosthesis, and soft tissue development in the interface of bone and implant due to inappropriate selection of TKR material. The choice of most suitable materials for the femoral component of TKR is a critical decision; therefore, in this research paper, a hybrid multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) tactic is applied using the degree of membership (DoM) technique with a varied system, using the weighted sum method (WSM), the weighted product method (WPM), the weighted aggregated sum product assessment method (WASPAS), an evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS), and a technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). The weights of importance are assigned to different criteria by the equal weights method (EWM). Furthermore, sensitivity analysis is conducted to check the solidity of the projected tactic. The weights of importance are varied using the entropy weights technique (EWT) and the standard deviation method (SDM). The projected hybrid MCDM methodology is simple, reliable and valuable for a conflicting decision-making environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8074616
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80746162021-04-27 Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making and Sensitivity Analysis for Selection of Materials for Knee Implant Femoral Component Kumar, Raman Dubey, Rohit Singh, Sehijpal Singh, Sunpreet Prakash, Chander Nirsanametla, Yadaiah Królczyk, Grzegorz Chudy, Roman Materials (Basel) Article Total knee replacement (TKR) is a remarkable achievement in biomedical science that enhances human life. However, human beings still suffer from knee-joint-related problems such as aseptic loosening caused by excessive wear between articular surfaces, stress-shielding of the bone by prosthesis, and soft tissue development in the interface of bone and implant due to inappropriate selection of TKR material. The choice of most suitable materials for the femoral component of TKR is a critical decision; therefore, in this research paper, a hybrid multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) tactic is applied using the degree of membership (DoM) technique with a varied system, using the weighted sum method (WSM), the weighted product method (WPM), the weighted aggregated sum product assessment method (WASPAS), an evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS), and a technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). The weights of importance are assigned to different criteria by the equal weights method (EWM). Furthermore, sensitivity analysis is conducted to check the solidity of the projected tactic. The weights of importance are varied using the entropy weights technique (EWT) and the standard deviation method (SDM). The projected hybrid MCDM methodology is simple, reliable and valuable for a conflicting decision-making environment. MDPI 2021-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8074616/ /pubmed/33924189 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14082084 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kumar, Raman
Dubey, Rohit
Singh, Sehijpal
Singh, Sunpreet
Prakash, Chander
Nirsanametla, Yadaiah
Królczyk, Grzegorz
Chudy, Roman
Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making and Sensitivity Analysis for Selection of Materials for Knee Implant Femoral Component
title Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making and Sensitivity Analysis for Selection of Materials for Knee Implant Femoral Component
title_full Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making and Sensitivity Analysis for Selection of Materials for Knee Implant Femoral Component
title_fullStr Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making and Sensitivity Analysis for Selection of Materials for Knee Implant Femoral Component
title_full_unstemmed Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making and Sensitivity Analysis for Selection of Materials for Knee Implant Femoral Component
title_short Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making and Sensitivity Analysis for Selection of Materials for Knee Implant Femoral Component
title_sort multiple-criteria decision-making and sensitivity analysis for selection of materials for knee implant femoral component
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8074616/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33924189
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14082084
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarraman multiplecriteriadecisionmakingandsensitivityanalysisforselectionofmaterialsforkneeimplantfemoralcomponent
AT dubeyrohit multiplecriteriadecisionmakingandsensitivityanalysisforselectionofmaterialsforkneeimplantfemoralcomponent
AT singhsehijpal multiplecriteriadecisionmakingandsensitivityanalysisforselectionofmaterialsforkneeimplantfemoralcomponent
AT singhsunpreet multiplecriteriadecisionmakingandsensitivityanalysisforselectionofmaterialsforkneeimplantfemoralcomponent
AT prakashchander multiplecriteriadecisionmakingandsensitivityanalysisforselectionofmaterialsforkneeimplantfemoralcomponent
AT nirsanametlayadaiah multiplecriteriadecisionmakingandsensitivityanalysisforselectionofmaterialsforkneeimplantfemoralcomponent
AT krolczykgrzegorz multiplecriteriadecisionmakingandsensitivityanalysisforselectionofmaterialsforkneeimplantfemoralcomponent
AT chudyroman multiplecriteriadecisionmakingandsensitivityanalysisforselectionofmaterialsforkneeimplantfemoralcomponent