Cargando…
Reducing the Impact of Confounding Factors on Skin Cancer Classification via Image Segmentation: Technical Model Study
BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that artificial intelligence achieves similar or better performance than dermatologists in specific dermoscopic image classification tasks. However, artificial intelligence is susceptible to the influence of confounding factors within images (eg, skin markings), which...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8074854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33764307 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/21695 |
_version_ | 1783684434771312640 |
---|---|
author | Maron, Roman C Hekler, Achim Krieghoff-Henning, Eva Schmitt, Max Schlager, Justin G Utikal, Jochen S Brinker, Titus J |
author_facet | Maron, Roman C Hekler, Achim Krieghoff-Henning, Eva Schmitt, Max Schlager, Justin G Utikal, Jochen S Brinker, Titus J |
author_sort | Maron, Roman C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that artificial intelligence achieves similar or better performance than dermatologists in specific dermoscopic image classification tasks. However, artificial intelligence is susceptible to the influence of confounding factors within images (eg, skin markings), which can lead to false diagnoses of cancerous skin lesions. Image segmentation can remove lesion-adjacent confounding factors but greatly change the image representation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of 2 image classification workflows where images were either segmented or left unprocessed before the subsequent training and evaluation of a binary skin lesion classifier. METHODS: Separate binary skin lesion classifiers (nevus vs melanoma) were trained and evaluated on segmented and unsegmented dermoscopic images. For a more informative result, separate classifiers were trained on 2 distinct training data sets (human against machine [HAM] and International Skin Imaging Collaboration [ISIC]). Each training run was repeated 5 times. The mean performance of the 5 runs was evaluated on a multi-source test set (n=688) consisting of a holdout and an external component. RESULTS: Our findings showed that when trained on HAM, the segmented classifiers showed a higher overall balanced accuracy (75.6% [SD 1.1%]) than the unsegmented classifiers (66.7% [SD 3.2%]), which was significant in 4 out of 5 runs (P<.001). The overall balanced accuracy was numerically higher for the unsegmented ISIC classifiers (78.3% [SD 1.8%]) than for the segmented ISIC classifiers (77.4% [SD 1.5%]), which was significantly different in 1 out of 5 runs (P=.004). CONCLUSIONS: Image segmentation does not result in overall performance decrease but it causes the beneficial removal of lesion-adjacent confounding factors. Thus, it is a viable option to address the negative impact that confounding factors have on deep learning models in dermatology. However, the segmentation step might introduce new pitfalls, which require further investigations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8074854 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80748542021-05-06 Reducing the Impact of Confounding Factors on Skin Cancer Classification via Image Segmentation: Technical Model Study Maron, Roman C Hekler, Achim Krieghoff-Henning, Eva Schmitt, Max Schlager, Justin G Utikal, Jochen S Brinker, Titus J J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that artificial intelligence achieves similar or better performance than dermatologists in specific dermoscopic image classification tasks. However, artificial intelligence is susceptible to the influence of confounding factors within images (eg, skin markings), which can lead to false diagnoses of cancerous skin lesions. Image segmentation can remove lesion-adjacent confounding factors but greatly change the image representation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of 2 image classification workflows where images were either segmented or left unprocessed before the subsequent training and evaluation of a binary skin lesion classifier. METHODS: Separate binary skin lesion classifiers (nevus vs melanoma) were trained and evaluated on segmented and unsegmented dermoscopic images. For a more informative result, separate classifiers were trained on 2 distinct training data sets (human against machine [HAM] and International Skin Imaging Collaboration [ISIC]). Each training run was repeated 5 times. The mean performance of the 5 runs was evaluated on a multi-source test set (n=688) consisting of a holdout and an external component. RESULTS: Our findings showed that when trained on HAM, the segmented classifiers showed a higher overall balanced accuracy (75.6% [SD 1.1%]) than the unsegmented classifiers (66.7% [SD 3.2%]), which was significant in 4 out of 5 runs (P<.001). The overall balanced accuracy was numerically higher for the unsegmented ISIC classifiers (78.3% [SD 1.8%]) than for the segmented ISIC classifiers (77.4% [SD 1.5%]), which was significantly different in 1 out of 5 runs (P=.004). CONCLUSIONS: Image segmentation does not result in overall performance decrease but it causes the beneficial removal of lesion-adjacent confounding factors. Thus, it is a viable option to address the negative impact that confounding factors have on deep learning models in dermatology. However, the segmentation step might introduce new pitfalls, which require further investigations. JMIR Publications 2021-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8074854/ /pubmed/33764307 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/21695 Text en ©Roman C Maron, Achim Hekler, Eva Krieghoff-Henning, Max Schmitt, Justin G Schlager, Jochen S Utikal, Titus J Brinker. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 25.03.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Maron, Roman C Hekler, Achim Krieghoff-Henning, Eva Schmitt, Max Schlager, Justin G Utikal, Jochen S Brinker, Titus J Reducing the Impact of Confounding Factors on Skin Cancer Classification via Image Segmentation: Technical Model Study |
title | Reducing the Impact of Confounding Factors on Skin Cancer Classification via Image Segmentation: Technical Model Study |
title_full | Reducing the Impact of Confounding Factors on Skin Cancer Classification via Image Segmentation: Technical Model Study |
title_fullStr | Reducing the Impact of Confounding Factors on Skin Cancer Classification via Image Segmentation: Technical Model Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Reducing the Impact of Confounding Factors on Skin Cancer Classification via Image Segmentation: Technical Model Study |
title_short | Reducing the Impact of Confounding Factors on Skin Cancer Classification via Image Segmentation: Technical Model Study |
title_sort | reducing the impact of confounding factors on skin cancer classification via image segmentation: technical model study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8074854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33764307 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/21695 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maronromanc reducingtheimpactofconfoundingfactorsonskincancerclassificationviaimagesegmentationtechnicalmodelstudy AT heklerachim reducingtheimpactofconfoundingfactorsonskincancerclassificationviaimagesegmentationtechnicalmodelstudy AT krieghoffhenningeva reducingtheimpactofconfoundingfactorsonskincancerclassificationviaimagesegmentationtechnicalmodelstudy AT schmittmax reducingtheimpactofconfoundingfactorsonskincancerclassificationviaimagesegmentationtechnicalmodelstudy AT schlagerjusting reducingtheimpactofconfoundingfactorsonskincancerclassificationviaimagesegmentationtechnicalmodelstudy AT utikaljochens reducingtheimpactofconfoundingfactorsonskincancerclassificationviaimagesegmentationtechnicalmodelstudy AT brinkertitusj reducingtheimpactofconfoundingfactorsonskincancerclassificationviaimagesegmentationtechnicalmodelstudy |