Cargando…

Reducing the Impact of Confounding Factors on Skin Cancer Classification via Image Segmentation: Technical Model Study

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that artificial intelligence achieves similar or better performance than dermatologists in specific dermoscopic image classification tasks. However, artificial intelligence is susceptible to the influence of confounding factors within images (eg, skin markings), which...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maron, Roman C, Hekler, Achim, Krieghoff-Henning, Eva, Schmitt, Max, Schlager, Justin G, Utikal, Jochen S, Brinker, Titus J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8074854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33764307
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/21695
_version_ 1783684434771312640
author Maron, Roman C
Hekler, Achim
Krieghoff-Henning, Eva
Schmitt, Max
Schlager, Justin G
Utikal, Jochen S
Brinker, Titus J
author_facet Maron, Roman C
Hekler, Achim
Krieghoff-Henning, Eva
Schmitt, Max
Schlager, Justin G
Utikal, Jochen S
Brinker, Titus J
author_sort Maron, Roman C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that artificial intelligence achieves similar or better performance than dermatologists in specific dermoscopic image classification tasks. However, artificial intelligence is susceptible to the influence of confounding factors within images (eg, skin markings), which can lead to false diagnoses of cancerous skin lesions. Image segmentation can remove lesion-adjacent confounding factors but greatly change the image representation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of 2 image classification workflows where images were either segmented or left unprocessed before the subsequent training and evaluation of a binary skin lesion classifier. METHODS: Separate binary skin lesion classifiers (nevus vs melanoma) were trained and evaluated on segmented and unsegmented dermoscopic images. For a more informative result, separate classifiers were trained on 2 distinct training data sets (human against machine [HAM] and International Skin Imaging Collaboration [ISIC]). Each training run was repeated 5 times. The mean performance of the 5 runs was evaluated on a multi-source test set (n=688) consisting of a holdout and an external component. RESULTS: Our findings showed that when trained on HAM, the segmented classifiers showed a higher overall balanced accuracy (75.6% [SD 1.1%]) than the unsegmented classifiers (66.7% [SD 3.2%]), which was significant in 4 out of 5 runs (P<.001). The overall balanced accuracy was numerically higher for the unsegmented ISIC classifiers (78.3% [SD 1.8%]) than for the segmented ISIC classifiers (77.4% [SD 1.5%]), which was significantly different in 1 out of 5 runs (P=.004). CONCLUSIONS: Image segmentation does not result in overall performance decrease but it causes the beneficial removal of lesion-adjacent confounding factors. Thus, it is a viable option to address the negative impact that confounding factors have on deep learning models in dermatology. However, the segmentation step might introduce new pitfalls, which require further investigations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8074854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80748542021-05-06 Reducing the Impact of Confounding Factors on Skin Cancer Classification via Image Segmentation: Technical Model Study Maron, Roman C Hekler, Achim Krieghoff-Henning, Eva Schmitt, Max Schlager, Justin G Utikal, Jochen S Brinker, Titus J J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that artificial intelligence achieves similar or better performance than dermatologists in specific dermoscopic image classification tasks. However, artificial intelligence is susceptible to the influence of confounding factors within images (eg, skin markings), which can lead to false diagnoses of cancerous skin lesions. Image segmentation can remove lesion-adjacent confounding factors but greatly change the image representation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of 2 image classification workflows where images were either segmented or left unprocessed before the subsequent training and evaluation of a binary skin lesion classifier. METHODS: Separate binary skin lesion classifiers (nevus vs melanoma) were trained and evaluated on segmented and unsegmented dermoscopic images. For a more informative result, separate classifiers were trained on 2 distinct training data sets (human against machine [HAM] and International Skin Imaging Collaboration [ISIC]). Each training run was repeated 5 times. The mean performance of the 5 runs was evaluated on a multi-source test set (n=688) consisting of a holdout and an external component. RESULTS: Our findings showed that when trained on HAM, the segmented classifiers showed a higher overall balanced accuracy (75.6% [SD 1.1%]) than the unsegmented classifiers (66.7% [SD 3.2%]), which was significant in 4 out of 5 runs (P<.001). The overall balanced accuracy was numerically higher for the unsegmented ISIC classifiers (78.3% [SD 1.8%]) than for the segmented ISIC classifiers (77.4% [SD 1.5%]), which was significantly different in 1 out of 5 runs (P=.004). CONCLUSIONS: Image segmentation does not result in overall performance decrease but it causes the beneficial removal of lesion-adjacent confounding factors. Thus, it is a viable option to address the negative impact that confounding factors have on deep learning models in dermatology. However, the segmentation step might introduce new pitfalls, which require further investigations. JMIR Publications 2021-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8074854/ /pubmed/33764307 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/21695 Text en ©Roman C Maron, Achim Hekler, Eva Krieghoff-Henning, Max Schmitt, Justin G Schlager, Jochen S Utikal, Titus J Brinker. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 25.03.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Maron, Roman C
Hekler, Achim
Krieghoff-Henning, Eva
Schmitt, Max
Schlager, Justin G
Utikal, Jochen S
Brinker, Titus J
Reducing the Impact of Confounding Factors on Skin Cancer Classification via Image Segmentation: Technical Model Study
title Reducing the Impact of Confounding Factors on Skin Cancer Classification via Image Segmentation: Technical Model Study
title_full Reducing the Impact of Confounding Factors on Skin Cancer Classification via Image Segmentation: Technical Model Study
title_fullStr Reducing the Impact of Confounding Factors on Skin Cancer Classification via Image Segmentation: Technical Model Study
title_full_unstemmed Reducing the Impact of Confounding Factors on Skin Cancer Classification via Image Segmentation: Technical Model Study
title_short Reducing the Impact of Confounding Factors on Skin Cancer Classification via Image Segmentation: Technical Model Study
title_sort reducing the impact of confounding factors on skin cancer classification via image segmentation: technical model study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8074854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33764307
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/21695
work_keys_str_mv AT maronromanc reducingtheimpactofconfoundingfactorsonskincancerclassificationviaimagesegmentationtechnicalmodelstudy
AT heklerachim reducingtheimpactofconfoundingfactorsonskincancerclassificationviaimagesegmentationtechnicalmodelstudy
AT krieghoffhenningeva reducingtheimpactofconfoundingfactorsonskincancerclassificationviaimagesegmentationtechnicalmodelstudy
AT schmittmax reducingtheimpactofconfoundingfactorsonskincancerclassificationviaimagesegmentationtechnicalmodelstudy
AT schlagerjusting reducingtheimpactofconfoundingfactorsonskincancerclassificationviaimagesegmentationtechnicalmodelstudy
AT utikaljochens reducingtheimpactofconfoundingfactorsonskincancerclassificationviaimagesegmentationtechnicalmodelstudy
AT brinkertitusj reducingtheimpactofconfoundingfactorsonskincancerclassificationviaimagesegmentationtechnicalmodelstudy