Cargando…

Good Literacy to Enhance Response in Diabetes Mellitus (GLITTER-DM)

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of individualized communication strategies and self-management action plans to improve A1c control at 3 months in patients with low health literacy. METHODS: A prospective, open-labeled, pilot study was conducted on 23 patients w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dang, Yen H., Patel-Shori, Nima M., Barros, Michael, Yu, Daohai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8075145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34007632
http://dx.doi.org/10.24926/iip.v11i3.2406
_version_ 1783684487169703936
author Dang, Yen H.
Patel-Shori, Nima M.
Barros, Michael
Yu, Daohai
author_facet Dang, Yen H.
Patel-Shori, Nima M.
Barros, Michael
Yu, Daohai
author_sort Dang, Yen H.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of individualized communication strategies and self-management action plans to improve A1c control at 3 months in patients with low health literacy. METHODS: A prospective, open-labeled, pilot study was conducted on 23 patients with diabetes mellitus in a pharmacist-led ambulatory care clinic. Patients who had a Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine- Revised (REALM-R) score of 6 or less and an A1c greater than 7% upon study entry were included. The first group received the teach-back method, personalized actions, and follow-up phone calls to assess comprehension (N = 12). The second group was assigned to usual care (N = 11). RESULTS: Patients receiving literacy-appropriate interventions had greater A1c percent reduction (A1c difference of -2.0 ± 1.3 vs -1.0 ± 2.2; P = 0.02) and less hyperglycemic events per week (0.1 vs. 2.1; P = 0.04). There were no differences in the number of hypoglycemic events, testing frequency, medication-adherence rates, or hospitalizations and emergency room visits related to diabetes. CONCLUSION: Literacy-appropriate methods such as the teach-back method, personalized action plans, and telephone follow-ups may improve glycemic control in low health literate patients with diabetes. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS AND INNOVATIONS: The findings from this study suggest that pharmacists may improve diabetes outcomes when managing patients who possess low health literacy using simplified teaching methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8075145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80751452021-05-17 Good Literacy to Enhance Response in Diabetes Mellitus (GLITTER-DM) Dang, Yen H. Patel-Shori, Nima M. Barros, Michael Yu, Daohai Innov Pharm Original Research OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of individualized communication strategies and self-management action plans to improve A1c control at 3 months in patients with low health literacy. METHODS: A prospective, open-labeled, pilot study was conducted on 23 patients with diabetes mellitus in a pharmacist-led ambulatory care clinic. Patients who had a Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine- Revised (REALM-R) score of 6 or less and an A1c greater than 7% upon study entry were included. The first group received the teach-back method, personalized actions, and follow-up phone calls to assess comprehension (N = 12). The second group was assigned to usual care (N = 11). RESULTS: Patients receiving literacy-appropriate interventions had greater A1c percent reduction (A1c difference of -2.0 ± 1.3 vs -1.0 ± 2.2; P = 0.02) and less hyperglycemic events per week (0.1 vs. 2.1; P = 0.04). There were no differences in the number of hypoglycemic events, testing frequency, medication-adherence rates, or hospitalizations and emergency room visits related to diabetes. CONCLUSION: Literacy-appropriate methods such as the teach-back method, personalized action plans, and telephone follow-ups may improve glycemic control in low health literate patients with diabetes. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS AND INNOVATIONS: The findings from this study suggest that pharmacists may improve diabetes outcomes when managing patients who possess low health literacy using simplified teaching methods. University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8075145/ /pubmed/34007632 http://dx.doi.org/10.24926/iip.v11i3.2406 Text en © Individual authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Dang, Yen H.
Patel-Shori, Nima M.
Barros, Michael
Yu, Daohai
Good Literacy to Enhance Response in Diabetes Mellitus (GLITTER-DM)
title Good Literacy to Enhance Response in Diabetes Mellitus (GLITTER-DM)
title_full Good Literacy to Enhance Response in Diabetes Mellitus (GLITTER-DM)
title_fullStr Good Literacy to Enhance Response in Diabetes Mellitus (GLITTER-DM)
title_full_unstemmed Good Literacy to Enhance Response in Diabetes Mellitus (GLITTER-DM)
title_short Good Literacy to Enhance Response in Diabetes Mellitus (GLITTER-DM)
title_sort good literacy to enhance response in diabetes mellitus (glitter-dm)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8075145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34007632
http://dx.doi.org/10.24926/iip.v11i3.2406
work_keys_str_mv AT dangyenh goodliteracytoenhanceresponseindiabetesmellitusglitterdm
AT patelshorinimam goodliteracytoenhanceresponseindiabetesmellitusglitterdm
AT barrosmichael goodliteracytoenhanceresponseindiabetesmellitusglitterdm
AT yudaohai goodliteracytoenhanceresponseindiabetesmellitusglitterdm