Cargando…
The Great I-QALY Disaster
The QALY is an impossible construct; it defies common sense. It fails completely once we consider the axioms of fundamental measurement. Utilities as ordinal scales cannot be used to create QALYS. The QALY should never have been introduced to support the value assessment of pharmaceutical products a...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8075148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34007635 http://dx.doi.org/10.24926/iip.v11i3.3359 |
_version_ | 1783684487862812672 |
---|---|
author | Langley, Paul C. |
author_facet | Langley, Paul C. |
author_sort | Langley, Paul C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The QALY is an impossible construct; it defies common sense. It fails completely once we consider the axioms of fundamental measurement. Utilities as ordinal scales cannot be used to create QALYS. The QALY should never have been introduced to support the value assessment of pharmaceutical products and devices. The result is 30 years of QALY based assessments of pharmaceutical products and devices which are conceptually and technically wrong. They are a charade and will have contributed mistakenly to thousands of formulary decisions. In the search for a common metric to evaluate cost-effectiveness the impossibility of a QALY was overlooked. The result is a disaster, unfolding over decades. Our next steps must be to abandon the QALY paradigm and look ahead to a new value assessment framework. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8075148 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80751482021-05-17 The Great I-QALY Disaster Langley, Paul C. Innov Pharm Commentary The QALY is an impossible construct; it defies common sense. It fails completely once we consider the axioms of fundamental measurement. Utilities as ordinal scales cannot be used to create QALYS. The QALY should never have been introduced to support the value assessment of pharmaceutical products and devices. The result is 30 years of QALY based assessments of pharmaceutical products and devices which are conceptually and technically wrong. They are a charade and will have contributed mistakenly to thousands of formulary decisions. In the search for a common metric to evaluate cost-effectiveness the impossibility of a QALY was overlooked. The result is a disaster, unfolding over decades. Our next steps must be to abandon the QALY paradigm and look ahead to a new value assessment framework. University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8075148/ /pubmed/34007635 http://dx.doi.org/10.24926/iip.v11i3.3359 Text en © Individual authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Langley, Paul C. The Great I-QALY Disaster |
title | The Great I-QALY Disaster |
title_full | The Great I-QALY Disaster |
title_fullStr | The Great I-QALY Disaster |
title_full_unstemmed | The Great I-QALY Disaster |
title_short | The Great I-QALY Disaster |
title_sort | great i-qaly disaster |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8075148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34007635 http://dx.doi.org/10.24926/iip.v11i3.3359 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT langleypaulc thegreatiqalydisaster AT langleypaulc greatiqalydisaster |