Cargando…

Eliminating the Board of Pharmacy’s Role in Designating a Pharmacist-in-Charge

Nearly all states require that each licensed pharmacy designate a pharmacist-in-charge (PIC). By law, the PIC typically has responsibility for all professional practice laws and facility standards laws and can be held accountable for such. However, the extent to which the PIC has actual authority ov...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Adams, Alex J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8075149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34007636
http://dx.doi.org/10.24926/iip.v11i3.3371
_version_ 1783684488084062208
author Adams, Alex J.
author_facet Adams, Alex J.
author_sort Adams, Alex J.
collection PubMed
description Nearly all states require that each licensed pharmacy designate a pharmacist-in-charge (PIC). By law, the PIC typically has responsibility for all professional practice laws and facility standards laws and can be held accountable for such. However, the extent to which the PIC has actual authority over many facility standards varies by organization. This can seemingly put a target on the back of the PIC for decisions they wield little authority over. Idaho recently removed the legal references to the PIC, signaling that facilities are responsible for facility standards and insulating pharmacists from discipline for matters that are outside their control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8075149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80751492021-05-17 Eliminating the Board of Pharmacy’s Role in Designating a Pharmacist-in-Charge Adams, Alex J. Innov Pharm Letter Nearly all states require that each licensed pharmacy designate a pharmacist-in-charge (PIC). By law, the PIC typically has responsibility for all professional practice laws and facility standards laws and can be held accountable for such. However, the extent to which the PIC has actual authority over many facility standards varies by organization. This can seemingly put a target on the back of the PIC for decisions they wield little authority over. Idaho recently removed the legal references to the PIC, signaling that facilities are responsible for facility standards and insulating pharmacists from discipline for matters that are outside their control. University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8075149/ /pubmed/34007636 http://dx.doi.org/10.24926/iip.v11i3.3371 Text en © Individual authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Letter
Adams, Alex J.
Eliminating the Board of Pharmacy’s Role in Designating a Pharmacist-in-Charge
title Eliminating the Board of Pharmacy’s Role in Designating a Pharmacist-in-Charge
title_full Eliminating the Board of Pharmacy’s Role in Designating a Pharmacist-in-Charge
title_fullStr Eliminating the Board of Pharmacy’s Role in Designating a Pharmacist-in-Charge
title_full_unstemmed Eliminating the Board of Pharmacy’s Role in Designating a Pharmacist-in-Charge
title_short Eliminating the Board of Pharmacy’s Role in Designating a Pharmacist-in-Charge
title_sort eliminating the board of pharmacy’s role in designating a pharmacist-in-charge
topic Letter
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8075149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34007636
http://dx.doi.org/10.24926/iip.v11i3.3371
work_keys_str_mv AT adamsalexj eliminatingtheboardofpharmacysroleindesignatingapharmacistincharge