Cargando…
Eliminating the Board of Pharmacy’s Role in Designating a Pharmacist-in-Charge
Nearly all states require that each licensed pharmacy designate a pharmacist-in-charge (PIC). By law, the PIC typically has responsibility for all professional practice laws and facility standards laws and can be held accountable for such. However, the extent to which the PIC has actual authority ov...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8075149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34007636 http://dx.doi.org/10.24926/iip.v11i3.3371 |
_version_ | 1783684488084062208 |
---|---|
author | Adams, Alex J. |
author_facet | Adams, Alex J. |
author_sort | Adams, Alex J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Nearly all states require that each licensed pharmacy designate a pharmacist-in-charge (PIC). By law, the PIC typically has responsibility for all professional practice laws and facility standards laws and can be held accountable for such. However, the extent to which the PIC has actual authority over many facility standards varies by organization. This can seemingly put a target on the back of the PIC for decisions they wield little authority over. Idaho recently removed the legal references to the PIC, signaling that facilities are responsible for facility standards and insulating pharmacists from discipline for matters that are outside their control. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8075149 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80751492021-05-17 Eliminating the Board of Pharmacy’s Role in Designating a Pharmacist-in-Charge Adams, Alex J. Innov Pharm Letter Nearly all states require that each licensed pharmacy designate a pharmacist-in-charge (PIC). By law, the PIC typically has responsibility for all professional practice laws and facility standards laws and can be held accountable for such. However, the extent to which the PIC has actual authority over many facility standards varies by organization. This can seemingly put a target on the back of the PIC for decisions they wield little authority over. Idaho recently removed the legal references to the PIC, signaling that facilities are responsible for facility standards and insulating pharmacists from discipline for matters that are outside their control. University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8075149/ /pubmed/34007636 http://dx.doi.org/10.24926/iip.v11i3.3371 Text en © Individual authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Letter Adams, Alex J. Eliminating the Board of Pharmacy’s Role in Designating a Pharmacist-in-Charge |
title | Eliminating the Board of Pharmacy’s Role in Designating a Pharmacist-in-Charge |
title_full | Eliminating the Board of Pharmacy’s Role in Designating a Pharmacist-in-Charge |
title_fullStr | Eliminating the Board of Pharmacy’s Role in Designating a Pharmacist-in-Charge |
title_full_unstemmed | Eliminating the Board of Pharmacy’s Role in Designating a Pharmacist-in-Charge |
title_short | Eliminating the Board of Pharmacy’s Role in Designating a Pharmacist-in-Charge |
title_sort | eliminating the board of pharmacy’s role in designating a pharmacist-in-charge |
topic | Letter |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8075149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34007636 http://dx.doi.org/10.24926/iip.v11i3.3371 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adamsalexj eliminatingtheboardofpharmacysroleindesignatingapharmacistincharge |