Cargando…
Spatial distribution of rural population using mixed geographically weighted regression: Evidence from Jiangxi Province in China
On the basis of the spatial panel data of 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2015, this study uses a mixed geographically weighted regression model to explore the spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of the rural (permanent) population in Jiangxi Province, China. Results show that residen...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8075265/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33901214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250399 |
_version_ | 1783684510536171520 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Liguo Leng, Langping Zeng, Yongming Lin, Xi Chen, Su |
author_facet | Zhang, Liguo Leng, Langping Zeng, Yongming Lin, Xi Chen, Su |
author_sort | Zhang, Liguo |
collection | PubMed |
description | On the basis of the spatial panel data of 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2015, this study uses a mixed geographically weighted regression model to explore the spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of the rural (permanent) population in Jiangxi Province, China. Results show that residents in the county area have a significant spatial positive autocorrelation, especially in the lake and mountain areas and the global Moran’ I index is more than 0.05. The influence of social and economic factors presents spatial homogeneity. The effect of urbanization and per capita disposable income is negative, whereas that of agricultural output value and rural electricity consumption is positive. The influence of climate factors presents spatial heterogeneity. The influence coefficient of rainfall in 2015 ranges from [-0.061, 0.133], which has a negative effect on the southwest mountain areas and a positive effect on the northeast lake areas., The influence coefficient of temperature in 2015 ranges from [-0.110, 0.094], which has a positive effect on the southwest mountain areas and a negative effect on the northeast lake areas. The influence coefficients of wind speed and relative humidity range from [-0.090, 0.153] and [-0.069, 0.130] in 2015 respectively, which further reinforce this effect. Therefore, scholars should pay attention to the universal adaptability of economic and social factors. Moreover, they should consider the spatial difference of climatic factors to promote urbanization following the local conditions. Finally, policymakers and concerned non-governmental institutions should fully understand the sensitivity of the rural population in underdeveloped mountain areas to climate factors to promote their rational distribution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8075265 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80752652021-05-05 Spatial distribution of rural population using mixed geographically weighted regression: Evidence from Jiangxi Province in China Zhang, Liguo Leng, Langping Zeng, Yongming Lin, Xi Chen, Su PLoS One Research Article On the basis of the spatial panel data of 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2015, this study uses a mixed geographically weighted regression model to explore the spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of the rural (permanent) population in Jiangxi Province, China. Results show that residents in the county area have a significant spatial positive autocorrelation, especially in the lake and mountain areas and the global Moran’ I index is more than 0.05. The influence of social and economic factors presents spatial homogeneity. The effect of urbanization and per capita disposable income is negative, whereas that of agricultural output value and rural electricity consumption is positive. The influence of climate factors presents spatial heterogeneity. The influence coefficient of rainfall in 2015 ranges from [-0.061, 0.133], which has a negative effect on the southwest mountain areas and a positive effect on the northeast lake areas., The influence coefficient of temperature in 2015 ranges from [-0.110, 0.094], which has a positive effect on the southwest mountain areas and a negative effect on the northeast lake areas. The influence coefficients of wind speed and relative humidity range from [-0.090, 0.153] and [-0.069, 0.130] in 2015 respectively, which further reinforce this effect. Therefore, scholars should pay attention to the universal adaptability of economic and social factors. Moreover, they should consider the spatial difference of climatic factors to promote urbanization following the local conditions. Finally, policymakers and concerned non-governmental institutions should fully understand the sensitivity of the rural population in underdeveloped mountain areas to climate factors to promote their rational distribution. Public Library of Science 2021-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8075265/ /pubmed/33901214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250399 Text en © 2021 Zhang et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Liguo Leng, Langping Zeng, Yongming Lin, Xi Chen, Su Spatial distribution of rural population using mixed geographically weighted regression: Evidence from Jiangxi Province in China |
title | Spatial distribution of rural population using mixed geographically weighted regression: Evidence from Jiangxi Province in China |
title_full | Spatial distribution of rural population using mixed geographically weighted regression: Evidence from Jiangxi Province in China |
title_fullStr | Spatial distribution of rural population using mixed geographically weighted regression: Evidence from Jiangxi Province in China |
title_full_unstemmed | Spatial distribution of rural population using mixed geographically weighted regression: Evidence from Jiangxi Province in China |
title_short | Spatial distribution of rural population using mixed geographically weighted regression: Evidence from Jiangxi Province in China |
title_sort | spatial distribution of rural population using mixed geographically weighted regression: evidence from jiangxi province in china |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8075265/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33901214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250399 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangliguo spatialdistributionofruralpopulationusingmixedgeographicallyweightedregressionevidencefromjiangxiprovinceinchina AT lenglangping spatialdistributionofruralpopulationusingmixedgeographicallyweightedregressionevidencefromjiangxiprovinceinchina AT zengyongming spatialdistributionofruralpopulationusingmixedgeographicallyweightedregressionevidencefromjiangxiprovinceinchina AT linxi spatialdistributionofruralpopulationusingmixedgeographicallyweightedregressionevidencefromjiangxiprovinceinchina AT chensu spatialdistributionofruralpopulationusingmixedgeographicallyweightedregressionevidencefromjiangxiprovinceinchina |