Cargando…
Estimating the effectiveness of routine asymptomatic PCR testing at different frequencies for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections
BACKGROUND: Routine asymptomatic testing using RT-PCR of people who interact with vulnerable populations, such as medical staff in hospitals or care workers in care homes, has been employed to help prevent outbreaks among vulnerable populations. Although the peak sensitivity of RT-PCR can be high, t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8075718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33902581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-01982-x |
_version_ | 1783684573659398144 |
---|---|
author | Hellewell, Joel Russell, Timothy W. Beale, Rupert Kelly, Gavin Houlihan, Catherine Nastouli, Eleni Kucharski, Adam J. |
author_facet | Hellewell, Joel Russell, Timothy W. Beale, Rupert Kelly, Gavin Houlihan, Catherine Nastouli, Eleni Kucharski, Adam J. |
author_sort | Hellewell, Joel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Routine asymptomatic testing using RT-PCR of people who interact with vulnerable populations, such as medical staff in hospitals or care workers in care homes, has been employed to help prevent outbreaks among vulnerable populations. Although the peak sensitivity of RT-PCR can be high, the probability of detecting an infection will vary throughout the course of an infection. The effectiveness of routine asymptomatic testing will therefore depend on testing frequency and how PCR detection varies over time. METHODS: We fitted a Bayesian statistical model to a dataset of twice weekly PCR tests of UK healthcare workers performed by self-administered nasopharyngeal swab, regardless of symptoms. We jointly estimated times of infection and the probability of a positive PCR test over time following infection; we then compared asymptomatic testing strategies by calculating the probability that a symptomatic infection is detected before symptom onset and the probability that an asymptomatic infection is detected within 7 days of infection. RESULTS: We estimated that the probability that the PCR test detected infection peaked at 77% (54–88%) 4 days after infection, decreasing to 50% (38–65%) by 10 days after infection. Our results suggest a substantially higher probability of detecting infections 1–3 days after infection than previously published estimates. We estimated that testing every other day would detect 57% (33–76%) of symptomatic cases prior to onset and 94% (75–99%) of asymptomatic cases within 7 days if test results were returned within a day. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that routine asymptomatic testing can enable detection of a high proportion of infected individuals early in their infection, provided that the testing is frequent and the time from testing to notification of results is sufficiently fast. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-021-01982-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8075718 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80757182021-04-27 Estimating the effectiveness of routine asymptomatic PCR testing at different frequencies for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections Hellewell, Joel Russell, Timothy W. Beale, Rupert Kelly, Gavin Houlihan, Catherine Nastouli, Eleni Kucharski, Adam J. BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Routine asymptomatic testing using RT-PCR of people who interact with vulnerable populations, such as medical staff in hospitals or care workers in care homes, has been employed to help prevent outbreaks among vulnerable populations. Although the peak sensitivity of RT-PCR can be high, the probability of detecting an infection will vary throughout the course of an infection. The effectiveness of routine asymptomatic testing will therefore depend on testing frequency and how PCR detection varies over time. METHODS: We fitted a Bayesian statistical model to a dataset of twice weekly PCR tests of UK healthcare workers performed by self-administered nasopharyngeal swab, regardless of symptoms. We jointly estimated times of infection and the probability of a positive PCR test over time following infection; we then compared asymptomatic testing strategies by calculating the probability that a symptomatic infection is detected before symptom onset and the probability that an asymptomatic infection is detected within 7 days of infection. RESULTS: We estimated that the probability that the PCR test detected infection peaked at 77% (54–88%) 4 days after infection, decreasing to 50% (38–65%) by 10 days after infection. Our results suggest a substantially higher probability of detecting infections 1–3 days after infection than previously published estimates. We estimated that testing every other day would detect 57% (33–76%) of symptomatic cases prior to onset and 94% (75–99%) of asymptomatic cases within 7 days if test results were returned within a day. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that routine asymptomatic testing can enable detection of a high proportion of infected individuals early in their infection, provided that the testing is frequent and the time from testing to notification of results is sufficiently fast. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-021-01982-x. BioMed Central 2021-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8075718/ /pubmed/33902581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-01982-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hellewell, Joel Russell, Timothy W. Beale, Rupert Kelly, Gavin Houlihan, Catherine Nastouli, Eleni Kucharski, Adam J. Estimating the effectiveness of routine asymptomatic PCR testing at different frequencies for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections |
title | Estimating the effectiveness of routine asymptomatic PCR testing at different frequencies for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections |
title_full | Estimating the effectiveness of routine asymptomatic PCR testing at different frequencies for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections |
title_fullStr | Estimating the effectiveness of routine asymptomatic PCR testing at different frequencies for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimating the effectiveness of routine asymptomatic PCR testing at different frequencies for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections |
title_short | Estimating the effectiveness of routine asymptomatic PCR testing at different frequencies for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections |
title_sort | estimating the effectiveness of routine asymptomatic pcr testing at different frequencies for the detection of sars-cov-2 infections |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8075718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33902581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-01982-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hellewelljoel estimatingtheeffectivenessofroutineasymptomaticpcrtestingatdifferentfrequenciesforthedetectionofsarscov2infections AT russelltimothyw estimatingtheeffectivenessofroutineasymptomaticpcrtestingatdifferentfrequenciesforthedetectionofsarscov2infections AT estimatingtheeffectivenessofroutineasymptomaticpcrtestingatdifferentfrequenciesforthedetectionofsarscov2infections AT estimatingtheeffectivenessofroutineasymptomaticpcrtestingatdifferentfrequenciesforthedetectionofsarscov2infections AT estimatingtheeffectivenessofroutineasymptomaticpcrtestingatdifferentfrequenciesforthedetectionofsarscov2infections AT bealerupert estimatingtheeffectivenessofroutineasymptomaticpcrtestingatdifferentfrequenciesforthedetectionofsarscov2infections AT kellygavin estimatingtheeffectivenessofroutineasymptomaticpcrtestingatdifferentfrequenciesforthedetectionofsarscov2infections AT houlihancatherine estimatingtheeffectivenessofroutineasymptomaticpcrtestingatdifferentfrequenciesforthedetectionofsarscov2infections AT nastoulieleni estimatingtheeffectivenessofroutineasymptomaticpcrtestingatdifferentfrequenciesforthedetectionofsarscov2infections AT kucharskiadamj estimatingtheeffectivenessofroutineasymptomaticpcrtestingatdifferentfrequenciesforthedetectionofsarscov2infections |