Cargando…
Practical clinical and radiological models to diagnose COVID-19 based on a multicentric teleradiological emergency chest CT cohort
Our aim was to develop practical models built with simple clinical and radiological features to help diagnosing Coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19] in a real-life emergency cohort. To do so, 513 consecutive adult patients suspected of having COVID-19 from 15 emergency departments from 2020-03-13 to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8076229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33903624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88053-6 |
_version_ | 1783684653096370176 |
---|---|
author | Schuster, Paul Crombé, Amandine Nivet, Hubert Berger, Alice Pourriol, Laurent Favard, Nicolas Chazot, Alban Alonzo-Lacroix, Florian Youssof, Emile Cheikh, Alexandre Ben Balique, Julien Porta, Basile Petitpierre, François Bouquet, Grégoire Mastier, Charles Bratan, Flavie Bergerot, Jean-François Thomson, Vivien Banaste, Nathan Gorincour, Guillaume |
author_facet | Schuster, Paul Crombé, Amandine Nivet, Hubert Berger, Alice Pourriol, Laurent Favard, Nicolas Chazot, Alban Alonzo-Lacroix, Florian Youssof, Emile Cheikh, Alexandre Ben Balique, Julien Porta, Basile Petitpierre, François Bouquet, Grégoire Mastier, Charles Bratan, Flavie Bergerot, Jean-François Thomson, Vivien Banaste, Nathan Gorincour, Guillaume |
author_sort | Schuster, Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | Our aim was to develop practical models built with simple clinical and radiological features to help diagnosing Coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19] in a real-life emergency cohort. To do so, 513 consecutive adult patients suspected of having COVID-19 from 15 emergency departments from 2020-03-13 to 2020-04-14 were included as long as chest CT-scans and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results were available (244 [47.6%] with a positive RT-PCR). Immediately after their acquisition, the chest CTs were prospectively interpreted by on-call teleradiologists (OCTRs) and systematically reviewed within one week by another senior teleradiologist. Each OCTR reading was concluded using a 5-point scale: normal, non-infectious, infectious non-COVID-19, indeterminate and highly suspicious of COVID-19. The senior reading reported the lesions’ semiology, distribution, extent and differential diagnoses. After pre-filtering clinical and radiological features through univariate Chi-2, Fisher or Student t-tests (as appropriate), multivariate stepwise logistic regression (Step-LR) and classification tree (CART) models to predict a positive RT-PCR were trained on 412 patients, validated on an independent cohort of 101 patients and compared with the OCTR performances (295 and 71 with available clinical data, respectively) through area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC). Regarding models elaborated on radiological variables alone, best performances were reached with the CART model (i.e., AUC = 0.92 [versus 0.88 for OCTR], sensitivity = 0.77, specificity = 0.94) while step-LR provided the highest AUC with clinical-radiological variables (AUC = 0.93 [versus 0.86 for OCTR], sensitivity = 0.82, specificity = 0.91). Hence, these two simple models, depending on the availability of clinical data, provided high performances to diagnose positive RT-PCR and could be used by any radiologist to support, modulate and communicate their conclusion in case of COVID-19 suspicion. Practically, using clinical and radiological variables (GGO, fever, presence of fibrotic bands, presence of diffuse lesions, predominant peripheral distribution) can accurately predict RT-PCR status. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8076229 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80762292021-04-27 Practical clinical and radiological models to diagnose COVID-19 based on a multicentric teleradiological emergency chest CT cohort Schuster, Paul Crombé, Amandine Nivet, Hubert Berger, Alice Pourriol, Laurent Favard, Nicolas Chazot, Alban Alonzo-Lacroix, Florian Youssof, Emile Cheikh, Alexandre Ben Balique, Julien Porta, Basile Petitpierre, François Bouquet, Grégoire Mastier, Charles Bratan, Flavie Bergerot, Jean-François Thomson, Vivien Banaste, Nathan Gorincour, Guillaume Sci Rep Article Our aim was to develop practical models built with simple clinical and radiological features to help diagnosing Coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19] in a real-life emergency cohort. To do so, 513 consecutive adult patients suspected of having COVID-19 from 15 emergency departments from 2020-03-13 to 2020-04-14 were included as long as chest CT-scans and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results were available (244 [47.6%] with a positive RT-PCR). Immediately after their acquisition, the chest CTs were prospectively interpreted by on-call teleradiologists (OCTRs) and systematically reviewed within one week by another senior teleradiologist. Each OCTR reading was concluded using a 5-point scale: normal, non-infectious, infectious non-COVID-19, indeterminate and highly suspicious of COVID-19. The senior reading reported the lesions’ semiology, distribution, extent and differential diagnoses. After pre-filtering clinical and radiological features through univariate Chi-2, Fisher or Student t-tests (as appropriate), multivariate stepwise logistic regression (Step-LR) and classification tree (CART) models to predict a positive RT-PCR were trained on 412 patients, validated on an independent cohort of 101 patients and compared with the OCTR performances (295 and 71 with available clinical data, respectively) through area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC). Regarding models elaborated on radiological variables alone, best performances were reached with the CART model (i.e., AUC = 0.92 [versus 0.88 for OCTR], sensitivity = 0.77, specificity = 0.94) while step-LR provided the highest AUC with clinical-radiological variables (AUC = 0.93 [versus 0.86 for OCTR], sensitivity = 0.82, specificity = 0.91). Hence, these two simple models, depending on the availability of clinical data, provided high performances to diagnose positive RT-PCR and could be used by any radiologist to support, modulate and communicate their conclusion in case of COVID-19 suspicion. Practically, using clinical and radiological variables (GGO, fever, presence of fibrotic bands, presence of diffuse lesions, predominant peripheral distribution) can accurately predict RT-PCR status. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8076229/ /pubmed/33903624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88053-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Schuster, Paul Crombé, Amandine Nivet, Hubert Berger, Alice Pourriol, Laurent Favard, Nicolas Chazot, Alban Alonzo-Lacroix, Florian Youssof, Emile Cheikh, Alexandre Ben Balique, Julien Porta, Basile Petitpierre, François Bouquet, Grégoire Mastier, Charles Bratan, Flavie Bergerot, Jean-François Thomson, Vivien Banaste, Nathan Gorincour, Guillaume Practical clinical and radiological models to diagnose COVID-19 based on a multicentric teleradiological emergency chest CT cohort |
title | Practical clinical and radiological models to diagnose COVID-19 based on a multicentric teleradiological emergency chest CT cohort |
title_full | Practical clinical and radiological models to diagnose COVID-19 based on a multicentric teleradiological emergency chest CT cohort |
title_fullStr | Practical clinical and radiological models to diagnose COVID-19 based on a multicentric teleradiological emergency chest CT cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Practical clinical and radiological models to diagnose COVID-19 based on a multicentric teleradiological emergency chest CT cohort |
title_short | Practical clinical and radiological models to diagnose COVID-19 based on a multicentric teleradiological emergency chest CT cohort |
title_sort | practical clinical and radiological models to diagnose covid-19 based on a multicentric teleradiological emergency chest ct cohort |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8076229/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33903624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88053-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schusterpaul practicalclinicalandradiologicalmodelstodiagnosecovid19basedonamulticentricteleradiologicalemergencychestctcohort AT crombeamandine practicalclinicalandradiologicalmodelstodiagnosecovid19basedonamulticentricteleradiologicalemergencychestctcohort AT nivethubert practicalclinicalandradiologicalmodelstodiagnosecovid19basedonamulticentricteleradiologicalemergencychestctcohort AT bergeralice practicalclinicalandradiologicalmodelstodiagnosecovid19basedonamulticentricteleradiologicalemergencychestctcohort AT pourriollaurent practicalclinicalandradiologicalmodelstodiagnosecovid19basedonamulticentricteleradiologicalemergencychestctcohort AT favardnicolas practicalclinicalandradiologicalmodelstodiagnosecovid19basedonamulticentricteleradiologicalemergencychestctcohort AT chazotalban practicalclinicalandradiologicalmodelstodiagnosecovid19basedonamulticentricteleradiologicalemergencychestctcohort AT alonzolacroixflorian practicalclinicalandradiologicalmodelstodiagnosecovid19basedonamulticentricteleradiologicalemergencychestctcohort AT youssofemile practicalclinicalandradiologicalmodelstodiagnosecovid19basedonamulticentricteleradiologicalemergencychestctcohort AT cheikhalexandreben practicalclinicalandradiologicalmodelstodiagnosecovid19basedonamulticentricteleradiologicalemergencychestctcohort AT baliquejulien practicalclinicalandradiologicalmodelstodiagnosecovid19basedonamulticentricteleradiologicalemergencychestctcohort AT portabasile practicalclinicalandradiologicalmodelstodiagnosecovid19basedonamulticentricteleradiologicalemergencychestctcohort AT petitpierrefrancois practicalclinicalandradiologicalmodelstodiagnosecovid19basedonamulticentricteleradiologicalemergencychestctcohort AT bouquetgregoire practicalclinicalandradiologicalmodelstodiagnosecovid19basedonamulticentricteleradiologicalemergencychestctcohort AT mastiercharles practicalclinicalandradiologicalmodelstodiagnosecovid19basedonamulticentricteleradiologicalemergencychestctcohort AT bratanflavie practicalclinicalandradiologicalmodelstodiagnosecovid19basedonamulticentricteleradiologicalemergencychestctcohort AT bergerotjeanfrancois practicalclinicalandradiologicalmodelstodiagnosecovid19basedonamulticentricteleradiologicalemergencychestctcohort AT thomsonvivien practicalclinicalandradiologicalmodelstodiagnosecovid19basedonamulticentricteleradiologicalemergencychestctcohort AT banastenathan practicalclinicalandradiologicalmodelstodiagnosecovid19basedonamulticentricteleradiologicalemergencychestctcohort AT gorincourguillaume practicalclinicalandradiologicalmodelstodiagnosecovid19basedonamulticentricteleradiologicalemergencychestctcohort |