Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of the immunodominant proteins of Brucella abortus for the diagnosis of cattle brucellosis
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The present serodiagnosis of brucellosis in livestock is based on the whole cell or smooth lipopolysaccharide of the Brucella organism in which specificity is hampered by the cross-reactivity, especially with the antibodies against Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 organism. The proble...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Veterinary World
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8076471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33935431 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.803-812 |
_version_ | 1783684687320842240 |
---|---|
author | Nagalingam, Mohandoss Basheer, Thaslim J. Balamurugan, Vinayagamurthy Shome, Rajeswari Kumari, S. Sowjanya Reddy, G. B. Manjunatha Shome, Bibek Ranjan Rahman, Habibur Roy, Parimal Kingston, J. Joseph Gandham, R. K. |
author_facet | Nagalingam, Mohandoss Basheer, Thaslim J. Balamurugan, Vinayagamurthy Shome, Rajeswari Kumari, S. Sowjanya Reddy, G. B. Manjunatha Shome, Bibek Ranjan Rahman, Habibur Roy, Parimal Kingston, J. Joseph Gandham, R. K. |
author_sort | Nagalingam, Mohandoss |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIM: The present serodiagnosis of brucellosis in livestock is based on the whole cell or smooth lipopolysaccharide of the Brucella organism in which specificity is hampered by the cross-reactivity, especially with the antibodies against Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 organism. The problem can be addressed by screening for better immunodominant antigens. Hence, the present study was undertaken to screen protein antigens of Brucella abortus for their diagnostic potential in cattle brucellosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Protein antigens of B. abortus (n=10) non-reactive to antibodies against Y. enterocolitica O:9 were selected, expressed in Escherichia coli, assessed the reactivity of expressed recombinant proteins by Western blot, standardized indirect-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detecting Brucella antibodies in cattle serum, and comparative evaluation was done. RESULTS: All the selected protein antigens were expressed and in the Western blot with Brucella antibodies positive cattle serum, six recombinant (Brucella protein 26 [BP26], Cu-Zn Superoxide dismutase [SodC], B. abortus I-1885, Serine protease, Bacterioferritin, and Brucella Lumazine Synthase [BLS]) proteins showed reaction whereas none of the proteins showed reactivity with Brucella negative cattle serum. ELISA has been done using known Brucella positive and negative cattle sera samples (n=113 each) in which the performance of recombinant proteins in diagnosing brucellosis was in the order of BP26 > BLS > SodC followed by rest of the proteins. BP26 based ELISA was found to be better with area under the curve as 0.953, and diagnostic sensitivity, diagnostic specificity, and Youden’s index of 90.27%, 95.58%, and 0.8584, respectively, with the excellent agreement (k=0.85). CONCLUSION: BP26 could be a potential diagnostic antigen among the immunodominant proteins of B. abortus in ruling out Y. enterocolitica O:9 infection while diagnosing brucellosis in cattle herds. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8076471 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Veterinary World |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80764712021-04-30 Comparative evaluation of the immunodominant proteins of Brucella abortus for the diagnosis of cattle brucellosis Nagalingam, Mohandoss Basheer, Thaslim J. Balamurugan, Vinayagamurthy Shome, Rajeswari Kumari, S. Sowjanya Reddy, G. B. Manjunatha Shome, Bibek Ranjan Rahman, Habibur Roy, Parimal Kingston, J. Joseph Gandham, R. K. Vet World Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIM: The present serodiagnosis of brucellosis in livestock is based on the whole cell or smooth lipopolysaccharide of the Brucella organism in which specificity is hampered by the cross-reactivity, especially with the antibodies against Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 organism. The problem can be addressed by screening for better immunodominant antigens. Hence, the present study was undertaken to screen protein antigens of Brucella abortus for their diagnostic potential in cattle brucellosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Protein antigens of B. abortus (n=10) non-reactive to antibodies against Y. enterocolitica O:9 were selected, expressed in Escherichia coli, assessed the reactivity of expressed recombinant proteins by Western blot, standardized indirect-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detecting Brucella antibodies in cattle serum, and comparative evaluation was done. RESULTS: All the selected protein antigens were expressed and in the Western blot with Brucella antibodies positive cattle serum, six recombinant (Brucella protein 26 [BP26], Cu-Zn Superoxide dismutase [SodC], B. abortus I-1885, Serine protease, Bacterioferritin, and Brucella Lumazine Synthase [BLS]) proteins showed reaction whereas none of the proteins showed reactivity with Brucella negative cattle serum. ELISA has been done using known Brucella positive and negative cattle sera samples (n=113 each) in which the performance of recombinant proteins in diagnosing brucellosis was in the order of BP26 > BLS > SodC followed by rest of the proteins. BP26 based ELISA was found to be better with area under the curve as 0.953, and diagnostic sensitivity, diagnostic specificity, and Youden’s index of 90.27%, 95.58%, and 0.8584, respectively, with the excellent agreement (k=0.85). CONCLUSION: BP26 could be a potential diagnostic antigen among the immunodominant proteins of B. abortus in ruling out Y. enterocolitica O:9 infection while diagnosing brucellosis in cattle herds. Veterinary World 2021-03 2021-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8076471/ /pubmed/33935431 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.803-812 Text en Copyright: © Nagalingam, et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nagalingam, Mohandoss Basheer, Thaslim J. Balamurugan, Vinayagamurthy Shome, Rajeswari Kumari, S. Sowjanya Reddy, G. B. Manjunatha Shome, Bibek Ranjan Rahman, Habibur Roy, Parimal Kingston, J. Joseph Gandham, R. K. Comparative evaluation of the immunodominant proteins of Brucella abortus for the diagnosis of cattle brucellosis |
title | Comparative evaluation of the immunodominant proteins of Brucella abortus for the diagnosis of cattle brucellosis |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of the immunodominant proteins of Brucella abortus for the diagnosis of cattle brucellosis |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of the immunodominant proteins of Brucella abortus for the diagnosis of cattle brucellosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of the immunodominant proteins of Brucella abortus for the diagnosis of cattle brucellosis |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of the immunodominant proteins of Brucella abortus for the diagnosis of cattle brucellosis |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of the immunodominant proteins of brucella abortus for the diagnosis of cattle brucellosis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8076471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33935431 http://dx.doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.803-812 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nagalingammohandoss comparativeevaluationoftheimmunodominantproteinsofbrucellaabortusforthediagnosisofcattlebrucellosis AT basheerthaslimj comparativeevaluationoftheimmunodominantproteinsofbrucellaabortusforthediagnosisofcattlebrucellosis AT balamuruganvinayagamurthy comparativeevaluationoftheimmunodominantproteinsofbrucellaabortusforthediagnosisofcattlebrucellosis AT shomerajeswari comparativeevaluationoftheimmunodominantproteinsofbrucellaabortusforthediagnosisofcattlebrucellosis AT kumarissowjanya comparativeevaluationoftheimmunodominantproteinsofbrucellaabortusforthediagnosisofcattlebrucellosis AT reddygbmanjunatha comparativeevaluationoftheimmunodominantproteinsofbrucellaabortusforthediagnosisofcattlebrucellosis AT shomebibekranjan comparativeevaluationoftheimmunodominantproteinsofbrucellaabortusforthediagnosisofcattlebrucellosis AT rahmanhabibur comparativeevaluationoftheimmunodominantproteinsofbrucellaabortusforthediagnosisofcattlebrucellosis AT royparimal comparativeevaluationoftheimmunodominantproteinsofbrucellaabortusforthediagnosisofcattlebrucellosis AT kingstonjjoseph comparativeevaluationoftheimmunodominantproteinsofbrucellaabortusforthediagnosisofcattlebrucellosis AT gandhamrk comparativeevaluationoftheimmunodominantproteinsofbrucellaabortusforthediagnosisofcattlebrucellosis |