Cargando…

Comparative Assessment of Familiarity/Novelty Preferences in Rodents

Sociality—i.e., life in social groups—has evolved many times in rodents, and there is considerable variation in the nature of these groups. While many species-typical behaviors have been described in field settings, the use of consistent behavioral assays in the laboratory provides key data for comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beery, Annaliese K., Shambaugh, Katharine L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8076734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33927601
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.648830
_version_ 1783684744436776960
author Beery, Annaliese K.
Shambaugh, Katharine L.
author_facet Beery, Annaliese K.
Shambaugh, Katharine L.
author_sort Beery, Annaliese K.
collection PubMed
description Sociality—i.e., life in social groups—has evolved many times in rodents, and there is considerable variation in the nature of these groups. While many species-typical behaviors have been described in field settings, the use of consistent behavioral assays in the laboratory provides key data for comparisons across species. The preference for interaction with familiar or novel individuals is an important dimension of social behavior. Familiarity preference, in particular, may be associated with more closed, less flexible social groups. The dimension from selectivity to gregariousness has been used as a factor in classification of social group types. Laboratory tests of social choice range from brief (10 minutes) to extended (e.g., 3 hours). As familiarity preferences typically need long testing intervals to manifest, we used 3-hour peer partner preference tests to test for the presence of familiarity preferences in same-sex cage-mates and strangers in rats. We then conducted an aggregated analysis of familiarity preferences across multiple rodent species (adult male and female rats, mice, prairie voles, meadow voles, and female degus) tested with the same protocol. We found a high degree of consistency within species across data sets, supporting the existence of strong, species-typical familiarity preferences in prairie voles and meadow voles, and a lack of familiarity preferences in other species tested. Sociability, or total time spent near conspecifics, was unrelated to selectivity in social preference. These findings provide important background for interpreting the neurobiological mechanisms involved in social behavior in these species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8076734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80767342021-04-28 Comparative Assessment of Familiarity/Novelty Preferences in Rodents Beery, Annaliese K. Shambaugh, Katharine L. Front Behav Neurosci Behavioral Neuroscience Sociality—i.e., life in social groups—has evolved many times in rodents, and there is considerable variation in the nature of these groups. While many species-typical behaviors have been described in field settings, the use of consistent behavioral assays in the laboratory provides key data for comparisons across species. The preference for interaction with familiar or novel individuals is an important dimension of social behavior. Familiarity preference, in particular, may be associated with more closed, less flexible social groups. The dimension from selectivity to gregariousness has been used as a factor in classification of social group types. Laboratory tests of social choice range from brief (10 minutes) to extended (e.g., 3 hours). As familiarity preferences typically need long testing intervals to manifest, we used 3-hour peer partner preference tests to test for the presence of familiarity preferences in same-sex cage-mates and strangers in rats. We then conducted an aggregated analysis of familiarity preferences across multiple rodent species (adult male and female rats, mice, prairie voles, meadow voles, and female degus) tested with the same protocol. We found a high degree of consistency within species across data sets, supporting the existence of strong, species-typical familiarity preferences in prairie voles and meadow voles, and a lack of familiarity preferences in other species tested. Sociability, or total time spent near conspecifics, was unrelated to selectivity in social preference. These findings provide important background for interpreting the neurobiological mechanisms involved in social behavior in these species. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8076734/ /pubmed/33927601 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.648830 Text en Copyright © 2021 Beery and Shambaugh. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Behavioral Neuroscience
Beery, Annaliese K.
Shambaugh, Katharine L.
Comparative Assessment of Familiarity/Novelty Preferences in Rodents
title Comparative Assessment of Familiarity/Novelty Preferences in Rodents
title_full Comparative Assessment of Familiarity/Novelty Preferences in Rodents
title_fullStr Comparative Assessment of Familiarity/Novelty Preferences in Rodents
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Assessment of Familiarity/Novelty Preferences in Rodents
title_short Comparative Assessment of Familiarity/Novelty Preferences in Rodents
title_sort comparative assessment of familiarity/novelty preferences in rodents
topic Behavioral Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8076734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33927601
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2021.648830
work_keys_str_mv AT beeryannaliesek comparativeassessmentoffamiliaritynoveltypreferencesinrodents
AT shambaughkatharinel comparativeassessmentoffamiliaritynoveltypreferencesinrodents