Cargando…

Additional Value of Integrated (18)F-FDG PET/MRI for Evaluating Biliary Tract Cancer: Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced CT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/MRI added to contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) in initial staging, assessment of resectability, and postoperative follow-up of biliary tract cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 100 patients (initial workup [n = 6...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoo, Jeongin, Lee, Jeong Min, Yoon, Jeong Hee, Joo, Ijin, Lee, Dong Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Radiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8076821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33660461
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.0689
_version_ 1783684765263593472
author Yoo, Jeongin
Lee, Jeong Min
Yoon, Jeong Hee
Joo, Ijin
Lee, Dong Ho
author_facet Yoo, Jeongin
Lee, Jeong Min
Yoon, Jeong Hee
Joo, Ijin
Lee, Dong Ho
author_sort Yoo, Jeongin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/MRI added to contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) in initial staging, assessment of resectability, and postoperative follow-up of biliary tract cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 100 patients (initial workup [n = 65] and postoperative follow-up [n = 35]) who had undergone PET/MRI and CECT for bile duct or gallbladder lesions between January 2013 and March 2020. Two radiologists independently reviewed the CECT imaging set and CECT plus PET/MRI set to determine the likelihood of malignancy, local and overall resectability, and distant metastasis in the initial workup group, and local recurrence and distant metastasis in the follow-up group. Diagnostic performances of the two imaging sets were compared using clinical-surgical-pathologic findings as standards of reference. RESULTS: The diagnostic performance of CECT significantly improved after the addition of PET/MRI for liver metastasis (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [A(z)]: 0.77 vs. 0.91 [p = 0.027] for reviewer 1; 0.76 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.021] for reviewer 2), lymph node metastasis (0.73 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.004]; 0.81 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.023]), and overall resectability (0.79 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.007]; 0.82 vs. 0.94 [p = 0.021]) in the initial workup group. In the follow-up group, the diagnostic performance of CECT plus PET/MRI was significantly higher than that of CECT imaging for local recurrence (0.81 vs. 1.00 [p = 0.029]; 0.82 vs. 0.94 [p = 0.045]). CONCLUSION: PET/MRI may add value to CECT in patients with biliary tract cancer both in the initial workup for staging and determination of overall resectability and in follow-up for local recurrence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8076821
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Korean Society of Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80768212021-05-06 Additional Value of Integrated (18)F-FDG PET/MRI for Evaluating Biliary Tract Cancer: Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced CT Yoo, Jeongin Lee, Jeong Min Yoon, Jeong Hee Joo, Ijin Lee, Dong Ho Korean J Radiol Gastrointestinal Imaging OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/MRI added to contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) in initial staging, assessment of resectability, and postoperative follow-up of biliary tract cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 100 patients (initial workup [n = 65] and postoperative follow-up [n = 35]) who had undergone PET/MRI and CECT for bile duct or gallbladder lesions between January 2013 and March 2020. Two radiologists independently reviewed the CECT imaging set and CECT plus PET/MRI set to determine the likelihood of malignancy, local and overall resectability, and distant metastasis in the initial workup group, and local recurrence and distant metastasis in the follow-up group. Diagnostic performances of the two imaging sets were compared using clinical-surgical-pathologic findings as standards of reference. RESULTS: The diagnostic performance of CECT significantly improved after the addition of PET/MRI for liver metastasis (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [A(z)]: 0.77 vs. 0.91 [p = 0.027] for reviewer 1; 0.76 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.021] for reviewer 2), lymph node metastasis (0.73 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.004]; 0.81 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.023]), and overall resectability (0.79 vs. 0.92 [p = 0.007]; 0.82 vs. 0.94 [p = 0.021]) in the initial workup group. In the follow-up group, the diagnostic performance of CECT plus PET/MRI was significantly higher than that of CECT imaging for local recurrence (0.81 vs. 1.00 [p = 0.029]; 0.82 vs. 0.94 [p = 0.045]). CONCLUSION: PET/MRI may add value to CECT in patients with biliary tract cancer both in the initial workup for staging and determination of overall resectability and in follow-up for local recurrence. The Korean Society of Radiology 2021-05 2021-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8076821/ /pubmed/33660461 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.0689 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Korean Society of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Gastrointestinal Imaging
Yoo, Jeongin
Lee, Jeong Min
Yoon, Jeong Hee
Joo, Ijin
Lee, Dong Ho
Additional Value of Integrated (18)F-FDG PET/MRI for Evaluating Biliary Tract Cancer: Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced CT
title Additional Value of Integrated (18)F-FDG PET/MRI for Evaluating Biliary Tract Cancer: Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced CT
title_full Additional Value of Integrated (18)F-FDG PET/MRI for Evaluating Biliary Tract Cancer: Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced CT
title_fullStr Additional Value of Integrated (18)F-FDG PET/MRI for Evaluating Biliary Tract Cancer: Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced CT
title_full_unstemmed Additional Value of Integrated (18)F-FDG PET/MRI for Evaluating Biliary Tract Cancer: Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced CT
title_short Additional Value of Integrated (18)F-FDG PET/MRI for Evaluating Biliary Tract Cancer: Comparison with Contrast-Enhanced CT
title_sort additional value of integrated (18)f-fdg pet/mri for evaluating biliary tract cancer: comparison with contrast-enhanced ct
topic Gastrointestinal Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8076821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33660461
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.0689
work_keys_str_mv AT yoojeongin additionalvalueofintegrated18ffdgpetmriforevaluatingbiliarytractcancercomparisonwithcontrastenhancedct
AT leejeongmin additionalvalueofintegrated18ffdgpetmriforevaluatingbiliarytractcancercomparisonwithcontrastenhancedct
AT yoonjeonghee additionalvalueofintegrated18ffdgpetmriforevaluatingbiliarytractcancercomparisonwithcontrastenhancedct
AT jooijin additionalvalueofintegrated18ffdgpetmriforevaluatingbiliarytractcancercomparisonwithcontrastenhancedct
AT leedongho additionalvalueofintegrated18ffdgpetmriforevaluatingbiliarytractcancercomparisonwithcontrastenhancedct