Cargando…

Aged care residents’ prioritization of care: A mixed‐methods study

BACKGROUND: Eliciting residents’ priorities for their care is fundamental to delivering person‐centred care in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). Prioritization involves ordering different aspects of care in relation to one another by level of importance. By understanding residents’ prioritie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ludlow, Kristiana, Churruca, Kate, Mumford, Virginia, Ellis, Louise A., Braithwaite, Jeffrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8077118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33477203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13195
_version_ 1783684821014282240
author Ludlow, Kristiana
Churruca, Kate
Mumford, Virginia
Ellis, Louise A.
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
author_facet Ludlow, Kristiana
Churruca, Kate
Mumford, Virginia
Ellis, Louise A.
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
author_sort Ludlow, Kristiana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Eliciting residents’ priorities for their care is fundamental to delivering person‐centred care in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). Prioritization involves ordering different aspects of care in relation to one another by level of importance. By understanding residents’ priorities, care can be tailored to residents’ needs while considering practical limitations of RACFs. OBJECTIVES: To investigate aged care residents’ prioritization of care. DESIGN: A mixed‐methods study comprising Q methodology and qualitative methods. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Thirty‐eight residents living in one of five Australian RACFs. METHOD: Participants completed a card–sorting activity using Q methodology in which they ordered 34 aspects of care on a pre‐defined grid by level of importance. Data were analysed using inverted factor analysis to identify factors representing shared viewpoints. Participants also completed a think‐aloud task, demographic questionnaire, post‐sorting interview and semi‐structured interview. Inductive content analysis of qualitative data was conducted to interpret shared viewpoints and to identify influences on prioritization decision making. RESULTS: Four viewpoints on care prioritization were identified through Q methodology: Maintaining a sense of spirituality and self in residential care; information sharing and family involvement; self‐reliance; and timely access to staff member support. Across the participant sample, residents prioritized being treated with respect, the management of medical conditions, and their independence. Inductive content analysis revealed four influences on prioritization decisions: level of dependency; dynamic needs; indifference; and availability of staff. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations for providing care that align with residents’ priorities include establishing open communication channels with residents, supporting residents’ independence and enforcing safer staffing ratios.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8077118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80771182021-04-29 Aged care residents’ prioritization of care: A mixed‐methods study Ludlow, Kristiana Churruca, Kate Mumford, Virginia Ellis, Louise A. Braithwaite, Jeffrey Health Expect Original Research Papers BACKGROUND: Eliciting residents’ priorities for their care is fundamental to delivering person‐centred care in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). Prioritization involves ordering different aspects of care in relation to one another by level of importance. By understanding residents’ priorities, care can be tailored to residents’ needs while considering practical limitations of RACFs. OBJECTIVES: To investigate aged care residents’ prioritization of care. DESIGN: A mixed‐methods study comprising Q methodology and qualitative methods. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Thirty‐eight residents living in one of five Australian RACFs. METHOD: Participants completed a card–sorting activity using Q methodology in which they ordered 34 aspects of care on a pre‐defined grid by level of importance. Data were analysed using inverted factor analysis to identify factors representing shared viewpoints. Participants also completed a think‐aloud task, demographic questionnaire, post‐sorting interview and semi‐structured interview. Inductive content analysis of qualitative data was conducted to interpret shared viewpoints and to identify influences on prioritization decision making. RESULTS: Four viewpoints on care prioritization were identified through Q methodology: Maintaining a sense of spirituality and self in residential care; information sharing and family involvement; self‐reliance; and timely access to staff member support. Across the participant sample, residents prioritized being treated with respect, the management of medical conditions, and their independence. Inductive content analysis revealed four influences on prioritization decisions: level of dependency; dynamic needs; indifference; and availability of staff. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations for providing care that align with residents’ priorities include establishing open communication channels with residents, supporting residents’ independence and enforcing safer staffing ratios. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-21 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8077118/ /pubmed/33477203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13195 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Papers
Ludlow, Kristiana
Churruca, Kate
Mumford, Virginia
Ellis, Louise A.
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
Aged care residents’ prioritization of care: A mixed‐methods study
title Aged care residents’ prioritization of care: A mixed‐methods study
title_full Aged care residents’ prioritization of care: A mixed‐methods study
title_fullStr Aged care residents’ prioritization of care: A mixed‐methods study
title_full_unstemmed Aged care residents’ prioritization of care: A mixed‐methods study
title_short Aged care residents’ prioritization of care: A mixed‐methods study
title_sort aged care residents’ prioritization of care: a mixed‐methods study
topic Original Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8077118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33477203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13195
work_keys_str_mv AT ludlowkristiana agedcareresidentsprioritizationofcareamixedmethodsstudy
AT churrucakate agedcareresidentsprioritizationofcareamixedmethodsstudy
AT mumfordvirginia agedcareresidentsprioritizationofcareamixedmethodsstudy
AT ellislouisea agedcareresidentsprioritizationofcareamixedmethodsstudy
AT braithwaitejeffrey agedcareresidentsprioritizationofcareamixedmethodsstudy