Cargando…

The impact of a physician’s recommendation and gender on informed decision making: A randomized controlled study in a simulated decision situation

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the influence of physicians’ recommendations and gender on the decision‐making process in a preference‐sensitive situation. METHODS: N = 201 participants were put in a hypothetical scenario in which they suffered from a rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meinhardt, Anna Lea, Eggeling, Marie, Cress, Ulrike, Kimmerle, Joachim, Bientzle, Martina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8077152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33274816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13161
_version_ 1783684828715024384
author Meinhardt, Anna Lea
Eggeling, Marie
Cress, Ulrike
Kimmerle, Joachim
Bientzle, Martina
author_facet Meinhardt, Anna Lea
Eggeling, Marie
Cress, Ulrike
Kimmerle, Joachim
Bientzle, Martina
author_sort Meinhardt, Anna Lea
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study examined the influence of physicians’ recommendations and gender on the decision‐making process in a preference‐sensitive situation. METHODS: N = 201 participants were put in a hypothetical scenario in which they suffered from a rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). They received general information on two equally successful treatment options for this injury (surgery vs physiotherapy) and answered questions regarding their treatment preference, certainty and satisfaction regarding their decision and attitude towards the treatment options. Then, participants watched a video that differed regarding physician's recommendation (surgery vs physiotherapy) and physician's gender (female vs male voice and picture). Afterwards, they indicated again their treatment preference, certainty, satisfaction and attitude, as well as the physician's professional and social competence. RESULTS: Participants changed their treatment preferences in the direction of the physician's recommendation (P < .001). Decision certainty (P < .001) and satisfaction (P < .001) increased more strongly if the physician's recommendation was congruent with the participant's prior attitude than if the recommendation was contrary to the participant's prior attitude. Finally, participants’ attitudes towards the recommended treatment became more positive (surgery recommendation: P < .001; physiotherapy recommendation: P < .001). We found no influence of the physician's gender on participants’ decisions, attitudes, or competence assessments. CONCLUSION: This research indicates that physicians should be careful with recommendations when aiming for shared decisions, as they might influence patients even if the patients have been made aware that they should take their personal preferences into account. This could be particularly problematic if the recommendation is not in line with the patient's preferences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8077152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80771522021-04-29 The impact of a physician’s recommendation and gender on informed decision making: A randomized controlled study in a simulated decision situation Meinhardt, Anna Lea Eggeling, Marie Cress, Ulrike Kimmerle, Joachim Bientzle, Martina Health Expect Original Research Papers OBJECTIVE: This study examined the influence of physicians’ recommendations and gender on the decision‐making process in a preference‐sensitive situation. METHODS: N = 201 participants were put in a hypothetical scenario in which they suffered from a rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). They received general information on two equally successful treatment options for this injury (surgery vs physiotherapy) and answered questions regarding their treatment preference, certainty and satisfaction regarding their decision and attitude towards the treatment options. Then, participants watched a video that differed regarding physician's recommendation (surgery vs physiotherapy) and physician's gender (female vs male voice and picture). Afterwards, they indicated again their treatment preference, certainty, satisfaction and attitude, as well as the physician's professional and social competence. RESULTS: Participants changed their treatment preferences in the direction of the physician's recommendation (P < .001). Decision certainty (P < .001) and satisfaction (P < .001) increased more strongly if the physician's recommendation was congruent with the participant's prior attitude than if the recommendation was contrary to the participant's prior attitude. Finally, participants’ attitudes towards the recommended treatment became more positive (surgery recommendation: P < .001; physiotherapy recommendation: P < .001). We found no influence of the physician's gender on participants’ decisions, attitudes, or competence assessments. CONCLUSION: This research indicates that physicians should be careful with recommendations when aiming for shared decisions, as they might influence patients even if the patients have been made aware that they should take their personal preferences into account. This could be particularly problematic if the recommendation is not in line with the patient's preferences. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-12-04 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8077152/ /pubmed/33274816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13161 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Papers
Meinhardt, Anna Lea
Eggeling, Marie
Cress, Ulrike
Kimmerle, Joachim
Bientzle, Martina
The impact of a physician’s recommendation and gender on informed decision making: A randomized controlled study in a simulated decision situation
title The impact of a physician’s recommendation and gender on informed decision making: A randomized controlled study in a simulated decision situation
title_full The impact of a physician’s recommendation and gender on informed decision making: A randomized controlled study in a simulated decision situation
title_fullStr The impact of a physician’s recommendation and gender on informed decision making: A randomized controlled study in a simulated decision situation
title_full_unstemmed The impact of a physician’s recommendation and gender on informed decision making: A randomized controlled study in a simulated decision situation
title_short The impact of a physician’s recommendation and gender on informed decision making: A randomized controlled study in a simulated decision situation
title_sort impact of a physician’s recommendation and gender on informed decision making: a randomized controlled study in a simulated decision situation
topic Original Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8077152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33274816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13161
work_keys_str_mv AT meinhardtannalea theimpactofaphysiciansrecommendationandgenderoninformeddecisionmakingarandomizedcontrolledstudyinasimulateddecisionsituation
AT eggelingmarie theimpactofaphysiciansrecommendationandgenderoninformeddecisionmakingarandomizedcontrolledstudyinasimulateddecisionsituation
AT cressulrike theimpactofaphysiciansrecommendationandgenderoninformeddecisionmakingarandomizedcontrolledstudyinasimulateddecisionsituation
AT kimmerlejoachim theimpactofaphysiciansrecommendationandgenderoninformeddecisionmakingarandomizedcontrolledstudyinasimulateddecisionsituation
AT bientzlemartina theimpactofaphysiciansrecommendationandgenderoninformeddecisionmakingarandomizedcontrolledstudyinasimulateddecisionsituation
AT meinhardtannalea impactofaphysiciansrecommendationandgenderoninformeddecisionmakingarandomizedcontrolledstudyinasimulateddecisionsituation
AT eggelingmarie impactofaphysiciansrecommendationandgenderoninformeddecisionmakingarandomizedcontrolledstudyinasimulateddecisionsituation
AT cressulrike impactofaphysiciansrecommendationandgenderoninformeddecisionmakingarandomizedcontrolledstudyinasimulateddecisionsituation
AT kimmerlejoachim impactofaphysiciansrecommendationandgenderoninformeddecisionmakingarandomizedcontrolledstudyinasimulateddecisionsituation
AT bientzlemartina impactofaphysiciansrecommendationandgenderoninformeddecisionmakingarandomizedcontrolledstudyinasimulateddecisionsituation