Cargando…

Decision aids to prepare patients for shared decision making: Two randomized controlled experiments on the impact of awareness of preference‐sensitivity and personal motives

OBJECTIVE: To participate in shared decision making (SDM), patients need to understand their options and develop trust in their own decision‐making abilities. Two experiments investigated the potential of decision aids (DAs) in preparing patients for SDM by raising awareness of preference‐sensitivit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Korger, Simone, Eggeling, Marie, Cress, Ulrike, Kimmerle, Joachim, Bientzle, Martina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8077165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33517579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13159
_version_ 1783684832065224704
author Korger, Simone
Eggeling, Marie
Cress, Ulrike
Kimmerle, Joachim
Bientzle, Martina
author_facet Korger, Simone
Eggeling, Marie
Cress, Ulrike
Kimmerle, Joachim
Bientzle, Martina
author_sort Korger, Simone
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To participate in shared decision making (SDM), patients need to understand their options and develop trust in their own decision‐making abilities. Two experiments investigated the potential of decision aids (DAs) in preparing patients for SDM by raising awareness of preference‐sensitivity (Study 1) and showing possible personal motives for decision making (Study 2) in addition to providing information about the treatment options. METHODS: Participants (Study 1: N = 117; Study 2: N = 217) were put into two scenarios (Study 1: cruciate ligament rupture; Study 2: contraception), watched a consultation video and were randomized into one of three groups where they received additional information in the form of (a) narrative patient testimonials; (b) non‐narrative decision strategies; and (c) an unrelated text (control group). RESULTS: Participants who viewed the patient testimonials or decision strategies felt better prepared for a decision (Study 1: P < .001, [Formula: see text]  = 0.43; Study 2: P < .001, [Formula: see text]  = 0.57) and evaluated the decision‐making process more positively (Study 2: P < .001, [Formula: see text]  = 0.13) than participants in the control condition. Decision certainty (Study 1: P < .001, [Formula: see text]  = 0.05) and satisfaction (Study 1: P < .001, [Formula: see text]  = 0.11; Study 2: P = .003, d = 0.29) were higher across all conditions after watching the consultation video, and certainty and satisfaction were lower in the control condition (Study 2: P < .001, [Formula: see text]  = 0.05). DISCUSSION: Decision aids that explain preference‐sensitivity and personal motives can be beneficial for improving people's feelings of being prepared and their perception of the decision‐making process. To reach decision certainty and satisfaction, being well informed of one's options is particularly relevant. We discuss the implications of our findings for future research and the design of DAs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8077165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80771652021-04-29 Decision aids to prepare patients for shared decision making: Two randomized controlled experiments on the impact of awareness of preference‐sensitivity and personal motives Korger, Simone Eggeling, Marie Cress, Ulrike Kimmerle, Joachim Bientzle, Martina Health Expect Original Research Papers OBJECTIVE: To participate in shared decision making (SDM), patients need to understand their options and develop trust in their own decision‐making abilities. Two experiments investigated the potential of decision aids (DAs) in preparing patients for SDM by raising awareness of preference‐sensitivity (Study 1) and showing possible personal motives for decision making (Study 2) in addition to providing information about the treatment options. METHODS: Participants (Study 1: N = 117; Study 2: N = 217) were put into two scenarios (Study 1: cruciate ligament rupture; Study 2: contraception), watched a consultation video and were randomized into one of three groups where they received additional information in the form of (a) narrative patient testimonials; (b) non‐narrative decision strategies; and (c) an unrelated text (control group). RESULTS: Participants who viewed the patient testimonials or decision strategies felt better prepared for a decision (Study 1: P < .001, [Formula: see text]  = 0.43; Study 2: P < .001, [Formula: see text]  = 0.57) and evaluated the decision‐making process more positively (Study 2: P < .001, [Formula: see text]  = 0.13) than participants in the control condition. Decision certainty (Study 1: P < .001, [Formula: see text]  = 0.05) and satisfaction (Study 1: P < .001, [Formula: see text]  = 0.11; Study 2: P = .003, d = 0.29) were higher across all conditions after watching the consultation video, and certainty and satisfaction were lower in the control condition (Study 2: P < .001, [Formula: see text]  = 0.05). DISCUSSION: Decision aids that explain preference‐sensitivity and personal motives can be beneficial for improving people's feelings of being prepared and their perception of the decision‐making process. To reach decision certainty and satisfaction, being well informed of one's options is particularly relevant. We discuss the implications of our findings for future research and the design of DAs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-31 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8077165/ /pubmed/33517579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13159 Text en © 2021 The Authors Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Papers
Korger, Simone
Eggeling, Marie
Cress, Ulrike
Kimmerle, Joachim
Bientzle, Martina
Decision aids to prepare patients for shared decision making: Two randomized controlled experiments on the impact of awareness of preference‐sensitivity and personal motives
title Decision aids to prepare patients for shared decision making: Two randomized controlled experiments on the impact of awareness of preference‐sensitivity and personal motives
title_full Decision aids to prepare patients for shared decision making: Two randomized controlled experiments on the impact of awareness of preference‐sensitivity and personal motives
title_fullStr Decision aids to prepare patients for shared decision making: Two randomized controlled experiments on the impact of awareness of preference‐sensitivity and personal motives
title_full_unstemmed Decision aids to prepare patients for shared decision making: Two randomized controlled experiments on the impact of awareness of preference‐sensitivity and personal motives
title_short Decision aids to prepare patients for shared decision making: Two randomized controlled experiments on the impact of awareness of preference‐sensitivity and personal motives
title_sort decision aids to prepare patients for shared decision making: two randomized controlled experiments on the impact of awareness of preference‐sensitivity and personal motives
topic Original Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8077165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33517579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13159
work_keys_str_mv AT korgersimone decisionaidstopreparepatientsforshareddecisionmakingtworandomizedcontrolledexperimentsontheimpactofawarenessofpreferencesensitivityandpersonalmotives
AT eggelingmarie decisionaidstopreparepatientsforshareddecisionmakingtworandomizedcontrolledexperimentsontheimpactofawarenessofpreferencesensitivityandpersonalmotives
AT cressulrike decisionaidstopreparepatientsforshareddecisionmakingtworandomizedcontrolledexperimentsontheimpactofawarenessofpreferencesensitivityandpersonalmotives
AT kimmerlejoachim decisionaidstopreparepatientsforshareddecisionmakingtworandomizedcontrolledexperimentsontheimpactofawarenessofpreferencesensitivityandpersonalmotives
AT bientzlemartina decisionaidstopreparepatientsforshareddecisionmakingtworandomizedcontrolledexperimentsontheimpactofawarenessofpreferencesensitivityandpersonalmotives