Cargando…
Decision aids to prepare patients for shared decision making: Two randomized controlled experiments on the impact of awareness of preference‐sensitivity and personal motives
OBJECTIVE: To participate in shared decision making (SDM), patients need to understand their options and develop trust in their own decision‐making abilities. Two experiments investigated the potential of decision aids (DAs) in preparing patients for SDM by raising awareness of preference‐sensitivit...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8077165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33517579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13159 |
_version_ | 1783684832065224704 |
---|---|
author | Korger, Simone Eggeling, Marie Cress, Ulrike Kimmerle, Joachim Bientzle, Martina |
author_facet | Korger, Simone Eggeling, Marie Cress, Ulrike Kimmerle, Joachim Bientzle, Martina |
author_sort | Korger, Simone |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To participate in shared decision making (SDM), patients need to understand their options and develop trust in their own decision‐making abilities. Two experiments investigated the potential of decision aids (DAs) in preparing patients for SDM by raising awareness of preference‐sensitivity (Study 1) and showing possible personal motives for decision making (Study 2) in addition to providing information about the treatment options. METHODS: Participants (Study 1: N = 117; Study 2: N = 217) were put into two scenarios (Study 1: cruciate ligament rupture; Study 2: contraception), watched a consultation video and were randomized into one of three groups where they received additional information in the form of (a) narrative patient testimonials; (b) non‐narrative decision strategies; and (c) an unrelated text (control group). RESULTS: Participants who viewed the patient testimonials or decision strategies felt better prepared for a decision (Study 1: P < .001, [Formula: see text] = 0.43; Study 2: P < .001, [Formula: see text] = 0.57) and evaluated the decision‐making process more positively (Study 2: P < .001, [Formula: see text] = 0.13) than participants in the control condition. Decision certainty (Study 1: P < .001, [Formula: see text] = 0.05) and satisfaction (Study 1: P < .001, [Formula: see text] = 0.11; Study 2: P = .003, d = 0.29) were higher across all conditions after watching the consultation video, and certainty and satisfaction were lower in the control condition (Study 2: P < .001, [Formula: see text] = 0.05). DISCUSSION: Decision aids that explain preference‐sensitivity and personal motives can be beneficial for improving people's feelings of being prepared and their perception of the decision‐making process. To reach decision certainty and satisfaction, being well informed of one's options is particularly relevant. We discuss the implications of our findings for future research and the design of DAs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8077165 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80771652021-04-29 Decision aids to prepare patients for shared decision making: Two randomized controlled experiments on the impact of awareness of preference‐sensitivity and personal motives Korger, Simone Eggeling, Marie Cress, Ulrike Kimmerle, Joachim Bientzle, Martina Health Expect Original Research Papers OBJECTIVE: To participate in shared decision making (SDM), patients need to understand their options and develop trust in their own decision‐making abilities. Two experiments investigated the potential of decision aids (DAs) in preparing patients for SDM by raising awareness of preference‐sensitivity (Study 1) and showing possible personal motives for decision making (Study 2) in addition to providing information about the treatment options. METHODS: Participants (Study 1: N = 117; Study 2: N = 217) were put into two scenarios (Study 1: cruciate ligament rupture; Study 2: contraception), watched a consultation video and were randomized into one of three groups where they received additional information in the form of (a) narrative patient testimonials; (b) non‐narrative decision strategies; and (c) an unrelated text (control group). RESULTS: Participants who viewed the patient testimonials or decision strategies felt better prepared for a decision (Study 1: P < .001, [Formula: see text] = 0.43; Study 2: P < .001, [Formula: see text] = 0.57) and evaluated the decision‐making process more positively (Study 2: P < .001, [Formula: see text] = 0.13) than participants in the control condition. Decision certainty (Study 1: P < .001, [Formula: see text] = 0.05) and satisfaction (Study 1: P < .001, [Formula: see text] = 0.11; Study 2: P = .003, d = 0.29) were higher across all conditions after watching the consultation video, and certainty and satisfaction were lower in the control condition (Study 2: P < .001, [Formula: see text] = 0.05). DISCUSSION: Decision aids that explain preference‐sensitivity and personal motives can be beneficial for improving people's feelings of being prepared and their perception of the decision‐making process. To reach decision certainty and satisfaction, being well informed of one's options is particularly relevant. We discuss the implications of our findings for future research and the design of DAs. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-31 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8077165/ /pubmed/33517579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13159 Text en © 2021 The Authors Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Papers Korger, Simone Eggeling, Marie Cress, Ulrike Kimmerle, Joachim Bientzle, Martina Decision aids to prepare patients for shared decision making: Two randomized controlled experiments on the impact of awareness of preference‐sensitivity and personal motives |
title | Decision aids to prepare patients for shared decision making: Two randomized controlled experiments on the impact of awareness of preference‐sensitivity and personal motives |
title_full | Decision aids to prepare patients for shared decision making: Two randomized controlled experiments on the impact of awareness of preference‐sensitivity and personal motives |
title_fullStr | Decision aids to prepare patients for shared decision making: Two randomized controlled experiments on the impact of awareness of preference‐sensitivity and personal motives |
title_full_unstemmed | Decision aids to prepare patients for shared decision making: Two randomized controlled experiments on the impact of awareness of preference‐sensitivity and personal motives |
title_short | Decision aids to prepare patients for shared decision making: Two randomized controlled experiments on the impact of awareness of preference‐sensitivity and personal motives |
title_sort | decision aids to prepare patients for shared decision making: two randomized controlled experiments on the impact of awareness of preference‐sensitivity and personal motives |
topic | Original Research Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8077165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33517579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.13159 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT korgersimone decisionaidstopreparepatientsforshareddecisionmakingtworandomizedcontrolledexperimentsontheimpactofawarenessofpreferencesensitivityandpersonalmotives AT eggelingmarie decisionaidstopreparepatientsforshareddecisionmakingtworandomizedcontrolledexperimentsontheimpactofawarenessofpreferencesensitivityandpersonalmotives AT cressulrike decisionaidstopreparepatientsforshareddecisionmakingtworandomizedcontrolledexperimentsontheimpactofawarenessofpreferencesensitivityandpersonalmotives AT kimmerlejoachim decisionaidstopreparepatientsforshareddecisionmakingtworandomizedcontrolledexperimentsontheimpactofawarenessofpreferencesensitivityandpersonalmotives AT bientzlemartina decisionaidstopreparepatientsforshareddecisionmakingtworandomizedcontrolledexperimentsontheimpactofawarenessofpreferencesensitivityandpersonalmotives |