Cargando…
A lattice topology optimization of cervical interbody fusion cage and finite element comparison with ZK60 and Ti-6Al-4V cages
BACKGROUND: In current clinical practice, the most commonly used fusion cage materials are titanium (Ti) alloys. However, titanium alloys are non-degradable and may cause stress shielding. ZK60 is a bio-absorbable implant that can effectively avoid long-term complications, such as stress shielding e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8077704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33902500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04244-2 |
_version_ | 1783684928813137920 |
---|---|
author | Sun, Jun Wang, Qiuan Cai, Dazhao Gu, Wenxiang Ma, Yiming Sun, Yang Wei, Yangyang Yuan, Feng |
author_facet | Sun, Jun Wang, Qiuan Cai, Dazhao Gu, Wenxiang Ma, Yiming Sun, Yang Wei, Yangyang Yuan, Feng |
author_sort | Sun, Jun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In current clinical practice, the most commonly used fusion cage materials are titanium (Ti) alloys. However, titanium alloys are non-degradable and may cause stress shielding. ZK60 is a bio-absorbable implant that can effectively avoid long-term complications, such as stress shielding effects, implant displacement, and foreign body reactions. In this study, we aimed at investigating the biomechanical behavior of the cervical spine after implanting different interbody fusion cages. METHODS: The finite element (FE) models of anterior cervical disc removal and bone graft fusion (ACDF) with a ZK60 cage and a Ti cage were constructed, respectively. Simulations were performed to evaluate their properties of flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation of the cervical spine. Moreover, a side-by-side comparison was conducted on the range of motion (ROM), the deformation of cages, the stress in the cages, bone grafts, and cage-end plate interface. Simultaneously, according to the biomechanical analysis results, the microporous structure of the ZK60 cage was improved by the lattice topology optimization technology and validation using static structure. RESULTS: The ROMs in the current study were comparable with the results reported in the literature. There was no significant difference in the deformation of the two cages under various conditions. Moreover, the maximum stress occurred at the rear of the cage in all cases. The cage’s and endplate-cage interface’s stress of the ZK60 group was reduced compared with the Ti cage, while the bone graft stress in the ZK60 fusion cage was significantly greater than that in the Ti fusion cage (average 27.70%). We further optimized the cage by filling it with lattice structures, the volume was decreased by 40%, and validation showed more significant biomechanical properties than ZK60 and Ti cages. CONCLUSION: The application of the ZK60 cage can significantly increase the stress stimulation to the bone graft by reducing the stress shielding effect between the two instrumented bodies. We also observed that the stress of the endplate-cage interface decreased as the reduction of the cage’s stiffness, indicating that subsidence is less likely to occur in the cage with lower stiffness. Moreover, we successfully designed a porous cage based on the biomechanical load by lattice optimization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8077704 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80777042021-04-29 A lattice topology optimization of cervical interbody fusion cage and finite element comparison with ZK60 and Ti-6Al-4V cages Sun, Jun Wang, Qiuan Cai, Dazhao Gu, Wenxiang Ma, Yiming Sun, Yang Wei, Yangyang Yuan, Feng BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: In current clinical practice, the most commonly used fusion cage materials are titanium (Ti) alloys. However, titanium alloys are non-degradable and may cause stress shielding. ZK60 is a bio-absorbable implant that can effectively avoid long-term complications, such as stress shielding effects, implant displacement, and foreign body reactions. In this study, we aimed at investigating the biomechanical behavior of the cervical spine after implanting different interbody fusion cages. METHODS: The finite element (FE) models of anterior cervical disc removal and bone graft fusion (ACDF) with a ZK60 cage and a Ti cage were constructed, respectively. Simulations were performed to evaluate their properties of flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation of the cervical spine. Moreover, a side-by-side comparison was conducted on the range of motion (ROM), the deformation of cages, the stress in the cages, bone grafts, and cage-end plate interface. Simultaneously, according to the biomechanical analysis results, the microporous structure of the ZK60 cage was improved by the lattice topology optimization technology and validation using static structure. RESULTS: The ROMs in the current study were comparable with the results reported in the literature. There was no significant difference in the deformation of the two cages under various conditions. Moreover, the maximum stress occurred at the rear of the cage in all cases. The cage’s and endplate-cage interface’s stress of the ZK60 group was reduced compared with the Ti cage, while the bone graft stress in the ZK60 fusion cage was significantly greater than that in the Ti fusion cage (average 27.70%). We further optimized the cage by filling it with lattice structures, the volume was decreased by 40%, and validation showed more significant biomechanical properties than ZK60 and Ti cages. CONCLUSION: The application of the ZK60 cage can significantly increase the stress stimulation to the bone graft by reducing the stress shielding effect between the two instrumented bodies. We also observed that the stress of the endplate-cage interface decreased as the reduction of the cage’s stiffness, indicating that subsidence is less likely to occur in the cage with lower stiffness. Moreover, we successfully designed a porous cage based on the biomechanical load by lattice optimization. BioMed Central 2021-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8077704/ /pubmed/33902500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04244-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sun, Jun Wang, Qiuan Cai, Dazhao Gu, Wenxiang Ma, Yiming Sun, Yang Wei, Yangyang Yuan, Feng A lattice topology optimization of cervical interbody fusion cage and finite element comparison with ZK60 and Ti-6Al-4V cages |
title | A lattice topology optimization of cervical interbody fusion cage and finite element comparison with ZK60 and Ti-6Al-4V cages |
title_full | A lattice topology optimization of cervical interbody fusion cage and finite element comparison with ZK60 and Ti-6Al-4V cages |
title_fullStr | A lattice topology optimization of cervical interbody fusion cage and finite element comparison with ZK60 and Ti-6Al-4V cages |
title_full_unstemmed | A lattice topology optimization of cervical interbody fusion cage and finite element comparison with ZK60 and Ti-6Al-4V cages |
title_short | A lattice topology optimization of cervical interbody fusion cage and finite element comparison with ZK60 and Ti-6Al-4V cages |
title_sort | lattice topology optimization of cervical interbody fusion cage and finite element comparison with zk60 and ti-6al-4v cages |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8077704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33902500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04244-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunjun alatticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages AT wangqiuan alatticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages AT caidazhao alatticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages AT guwenxiang alatticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages AT mayiming alatticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages AT sunyang alatticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages AT weiyangyang alatticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages AT yuanfeng alatticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages AT sunjun latticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages AT wangqiuan latticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages AT caidazhao latticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages AT guwenxiang latticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages AT mayiming latticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages AT sunyang latticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages AT weiyangyang latticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages AT yuanfeng latticetopologyoptimizationofcervicalinterbodyfusioncageandfiniteelementcomparisonwithzk60andti6al4vcages |