Cargando…

Bacteriophage therapy for inhibition of multi drug‐resistant uropathogenic bacteria: a narrative review

Multi-Drug Resistant (MDR) uropathogenic bacteria have increased in number in recent years and the development of new treatment options for the corresponding infections has become a major challenge in the field of medicine. In this respect, recent studies have proposed bacteriophage (phage) therapy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chegini, Zahra, Khoshbayan, Amin, Vesal, Soheil, Moradabadi, Alireza, Hashemi, Ali, Shariati, Aref
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8077874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33902597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-021-00433-y
_version_ 1783684966273515520
author Chegini, Zahra
Khoshbayan, Amin
Vesal, Soheil
Moradabadi, Alireza
Hashemi, Ali
Shariati, Aref
author_facet Chegini, Zahra
Khoshbayan, Amin
Vesal, Soheil
Moradabadi, Alireza
Hashemi, Ali
Shariati, Aref
author_sort Chegini, Zahra
collection PubMed
description Multi-Drug Resistant (MDR) uropathogenic bacteria have increased in number in recent years and the development of new treatment options for the corresponding infections has become a major challenge in the field of medicine. In this respect, recent studies have proposed bacteriophage (phage) therapy as a potential alternative against MDR Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) because the resistance mechanism of phages differs from that of antibiotics and few side effects have been reported for them. Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Proteus mirabilis are the most common uropathogenic bacteria against which phage therapy has been used. Phages, in addition to lysing bacterial pathogens, can prevent the formation of biofilms. Besides, by inducing or producing polysaccharide depolymerase, phages can easily penetrate into deeper layers of the biofilm and degrade it. Notably, phage therapy has shown good results in inhibiting multiple-species biofilm and this may be an efficient weapon against catheter-associated UTI. However, the narrow range of hosts limits the use of phage therapy. Therefore, the use of phage cocktail and combination therapy can form a highly attractive strategy. However, despite the positive use of these treatments, various studies have reported phage-resistant strains, indicating that phage–host interactions are more complicated and need further research. Furthermore, these investigations are limited and further clinical trials are required to make this treatment widely available for human use. This review highlights phage therapy in the context of treating UTIs and the specific considerations for this application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8077874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80778742021-04-29 Bacteriophage therapy for inhibition of multi drug‐resistant uropathogenic bacteria: a narrative review Chegini, Zahra Khoshbayan, Amin Vesal, Soheil Moradabadi, Alireza Hashemi, Ali Shariati, Aref Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob Review Multi-Drug Resistant (MDR) uropathogenic bacteria have increased in number in recent years and the development of new treatment options for the corresponding infections has become a major challenge in the field of medicine. In this respect, recent studies have proposed bacteriophage (phage) therapy as a potential alternative against MDR Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) because the resistance mechanism of phages differs from that of antibiotics and few side effects have been reported for them. Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Proteus mirabilis are the most common uropathogenic bacteria against which phage therapy has been used. Phages, in addition to lysing bacterial pathogens, can prevent the formation of biofilms. Besides, by inducing or producing polysaccharide depolymerase, phages can easily penetrate into deeper layers of the biofilm and degrade it. Notably, phage therapy has shown good results in inhibiting multiple-species biofilm and this may be an efficient weapon against catheter-associated UTI. However, the narrow range of hosts limits the use of phage therapy. Therefore, the use of phage cocktail and combination therapy can form a highly attractive strategy. However, despite the positive use of these treatments, various studies have reported phage-resistant strains, indicating that phage–host interactions are more complicated and need further research. Furthermore, these investigations are limited and further clinical trials are required to make this treatment widely available for human use. This review highlights phage therapy in the context of treating UTIs and the specific considerations for this application. BioMed Central 2021-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8077874/ /pubmed/33902597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-021-00433-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Chegini, Zahra
Khoshbayan, Amin
Vesal, Soheil
Moradabadi, Alireza
Hashemi, Ali
Shariati, Aref
Bacteriophage therapy for inhibition of multi drug‐resistant uropathogenic bacteria: a narrative review
title Bacteriophage therapy for inhibition of multi drug‐resistant uropathogenic bacteria: a narrative review
title_full Bacteriophage therapy for inhibition of multi drug‐resistant uropathogenic bacteria: a narrative review
title_fullStr Bacteriophage therapy for inhibition of multi drug‐resistant uropathogenic bacteria: a narrative review
title_full_unstemmed Bacteriophage therapy for inhibition of multi drug‐resistant uropathogenic bacteria: a narrative review
title_short Bacteriophage therapy for inhibition of multi drug‐resistant uropathogenic bacteria: a narrative review
title_sort bacteriophage therapy for inhibition of multi drug‐resistant uropathogenic bacteria: a narrative review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8077874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33902597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-021-00433-y
work_keys_str_mv AT cheginizahra bacteriophagetherapyforinhibitionofmultidrugresistanturopathogenicbacteriaanarrativereview
AT khoshbayanamin bacteriophagetherapyforinhibitionofmultidrugresistanturopathogenicbacteriaanarrativereview
AT vesalsoheil bacteriophagetherapyforinhibitionofmultidrugresistanturopathogenicbacteriaanarrativereview
AT moradabadialireza bacteriophagetherapyforinhibitionofmultidrugresistanturopathogenicbacteriaanarrativereview
AT hashemiali bacteriophagetherapyforinhibitionofmultidrugresistanturopathogenicbacteriaanarrativereview
AT shariatiaref bacteriophagetherapyforinhibitionofmultidrugresistanturopathogenicbacteriaanarrativereview