Cargando…
Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, noncontact tonopachy, Pentacam HR, and Fourier-domain OCT
We retrospectively compared the central corneal thickness (CCT) obtained by ultrasound pachymetry (USP; SP-3000, Tomey Corp., Nagoya, Japan), non-contact tonopachy (TP) (NT-530P, Nidek Co., Ltd., Gamagori, Japan), Pentacam HR (OCULUS Inc., Wetzlar, Germany), and RTVue optical coherence tomography (O...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8078248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33879743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025638 |
_version_ | 1783685020011986944 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Jung Sub Rho, Chang Rae Cho, Yeon Woo Shin, Jeongah |
author_facet | Kim, Jung Sub Rho, Chang Rae Cho, Yeon Woo Shin, Jeongah |
author_sort | Kim, Jung Sub |
collection | PubMed |
description | We retrospectively compared the central corneal thickness (CCT) obtained by ultrasound pachymetry (USP; SP-3000, Tomey Corp., Nagoya, Japan), non-contact tonopachy (TP) (NT-530P, Nidek Co., Ltd., Gamagori, Japan), Pentacam HR (OCULUS Inc., Wetzlar, Germany), and RTVue optical coherence tomography (OCT) (Optovue Inc., Fremont, CA, USA) in 78 eyes of 78 healthy subjects with myopia. Agreement between the measurement methods was evaluated using 95% confidence intervals for the limits of agreement (LoA). The mean CCT values were 546.9 ± 34.7, 548.1 ± 33.5, 559.2 ± 34.0, and 547.2 ± 34.8 μm for USP, non-contact TP, Pentacam, and RTVue, respectively. The thickest and the thinnest mean CCT values corresponded to those obtained by Pentacam HR and USP, respectively. Plots of the differences against the means showed the best agreement between USP and RTVue (LoA, 10.14–10.70 μm), while the largest discrepancy was observed between RTVue and Pentacam systems (LoA, −25.47–1.44 μm). Our data showed that CCT measurements using these 4 instruments were well correlated. However, the results from Pentacam differed significantly from those of the other instruments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8078248 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80782482021-04-27 Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, noncontact tonopachy, Pentacam HR, and Fourier-domain OCT Kim, Jung Sub Rho, Chang Rae Cho, Yeon Woo Shin, Jeongah Medicine (Baltimore) 5800 We retrospectively compared the central corneal thickness (CCT) obtained by ultrasound pachymetry (USP; SP-3000, Tomey Corp., Nagoya, Japan), non-contact tonopachy (TP) (NT-530P, Nidek Co., Ltd., Gamagori, Japan), Pentacam HR (OCULUS Inc., Wetzlar, Germany), and RTVue optical coherence tomography (OCT) (Optovue Inc., Fremont, CA, USA) in 78 eyes of 78 healthy subjects with myopia. Agreement between the measurement methods was evaluated using 95% confidence intervals for the limits of agreement (LoA). The mean CCT values were 546.9 ± 34.7, 548.1 ± 33.5, 559.2 ± 34.0, and 547.2 ± 34.8 μm for USP, non-contact TP, Pentacam, and RTVue, respectively. The thickest and the thinnest mean CCT values corresponded to those obtained by Pentacam HR and USP, respectively. Plots of the differences against the means showed the best agreement between USP and RTVue (LoA, 10.14–10.70 μm), while the largest discrepancy was observed between RTVue and Pentacam systems (LoA, −25.47–1.44 μm). Our data showed that CCT measurements using these 4 instruments were well correlated. However, the results from Pentacam differed significantly from those of the other instruments. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8078248/ /pubmed/33879743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025638 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | 5800 Kim, Jung Sub Rho, Chang Rae Cho, Yeon Woo Shin, Jeongah Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, noncontact tonopachy, Pentacam HR, and Fourier-domain OCT |
title | Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, noncontact tonopachy, Pentacam HR, and Fourier-domain OCT |
title_full | Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, noncontact tonopachy, Pentacam HR, and Fourier-domain OCT |
title_fullStr | Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, noncontact tonopachy, Pentacam HR, and Fourier-domain OCT |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, noncontact tonopachy, Pentacam HR, and Fourier-domain OCT |
title_short | Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, noncontact tonopachy, Pentacam HR, and Fourier-domain OCT |
title_sort | comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, noncontact tonopachy, pentacam hr, and fourier-domain oct |
topic | 5800 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8078248/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33879743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025638 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimjungsub comparisonofcornealthicknessmeasurementsusingultrasoundpachymetrynoncontacttonopachypentacamhrandfourierdomainoct AT rhochangrae comparisonofcornealthicknessmeasurementsusingultrasoundpachymetrynoncontacttonopachypentacamhrandfourierdomainoct AT choyeonwoo comparisonofcornealthicknessmeasurementsusingultrasoundpachymetrynoncontacttonopachypentacamhrandfourierdomainoct AT shinjeongah comparisonofcornealthicknessmeasurementsusingultrasoundpachymetrynoncontacttonopachypentacamhrandfourierdomainoct |