Cargando…

Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, noncontact tonopachy, Pentacam HR, and Fourier-domain OCT

We retrospectively compared the central corneal thickness (CCT) obtained by ultrasound pachymetry (USP; SP-3000, Tomey Corp., Nagoya, Japan), non-contact tonopachy (TP) (NT-530P, Nidek Co., Ltd., Gamagori, Japan), Pentacam HR (OCULUS Inc., Wetzlar, Germany), and RTVue optical coherence tomography (O...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jung Sub, Rho, Chang Rae, Cho, Yeon Woo, Shin, Jeongah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8078248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33879743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025638
_version_ 1783685020011986944
author Kim, Jung Sub
Rho, Chang Rae
Cho, Yeon Woo
Shin, Jeongah
author_facet Kim, Jung Sub
Rho, Chang Rae
Cho, Yeon Woo
Shin, Jeongah
author_sort Kim, Jung Sub
collection PubMed
description We retrospectively compared the central corneal thickness (CCT) obtained by ultrasound pachymetry (USP; SP-3000, Tomey Corp., Nagoya, Japan), non-contact tonopachy (TP) (NT-530P, Nidek Co., Ltd., Gamagori, Japan), Pentacam HR (OCULUS Inc., Wetzlar, Germany), and RTVue optical coherence tomography (OCT) (Optovue Inc., Fremont, CA, USA) in 78 eyes of 78 healthy subjects with myopia. Agreement between the measurement methods was evaluated using 95% confidence intervals for the limits of agreement (LoA). The mean CCT values were 546.9 ± 34.7, 548.1 ± 33.5, 559.2 ± 34.0, and 547.2 ± 34.8 μm for USP, non-contact TP, Pentacam, and RTVue, respectively. The thickest and the thinnest mean CCT values corresponded to those obtained by Pentacam HR and USP, respectively. Plots of the differences against the means showed the best agreement between USP and RTVue (LoA, 10.14–10.70 μm), while the largest discrepancy was observed between RTVue and Pentacam systems (LoA, −25.47–1.44 μm). Our data showed that CCT measurements using these 4 instruments were well correlated. However, the results from Pentacam differed significantly from those of the other instruments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8078248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80782482021-04-27 Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, noncontact tonopachy, Pentacam HR, and Fourier-domain OCT Kim, Jung Sub Rho, Chang Rae Cho, Yeon Woo Shin, Jeongah Medicine (Baltimore) 5800 We retrospectively compared the central corneal thickness (CCT) obtained by ultrasound pachymetry (USP; SP-3000, Tomey Corp., Nagoya, Japan), non-contact tonopachy (TP) (NT-530P, Nidek Co., Ltd., Gamagori, Japan), Pentacam HR (OCULUS Inc., Wetzlar, Germany), and RTVue optical coherence tomography (OCT) (Optovue Inc., Fremont, CA, USA) in 78 eyes of 78 healthy subjects with myopia. Agreement between the measurement methods was evaluated using 95% confidence intervals for the limits of agreement (LoA). The mean CCT values were 546.9 ± 34.7, 548.1 ± 33.5, 559.2 ± 34.0, and 547.2 ± 34.8 μm for USP, non-contact TP, Pentacam, and RTVue, respectively. The thickest and the thinnest mean CCT values corresponded to those obtained by Pentacam HR and USP, respectively. Plots of the differences against the means showed the best agreement between USP and RTVue (LoA, 10.14–10.70 μm), while the largest discrepancy was observed between RTVue and Pentacam systems (LoA, −25.47–1.44 μm). Our data showed that CCT measurements using these 4 instruments were well correlated. However, the results from Pentacam differed significantly from those of the other instruments. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8078248/ /pubmed/33879743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025638 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle 5800
Kim, Jung Sub
Rho, Chang Rae
Cho, Yeon Woo
Shin, Jeongah
Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, noncontact tonopachy, Pentacam HR, and Fourier-domain OCT
title Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, noncontact tonopachy, Pentacam HR, and Fourier-domain OCT
title_full Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, noncontact tonopachy, Pentacam HR, and Fourier-domain OCT
title_fullStr Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, noncontact tonopachy, Pentacam HR, and Fourier-domain OCT
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, noncontact tonopachy, Pentacam HR, and Fourier-domain OCT
title_short Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, noncontact tonopachy, Pentacam HR, and Fourier-domain OCT
title_sort comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, noncontact tonopachy, pentacam hr, and fourier-domain oct
topic 5800
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8078248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33879743
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025638
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjungsub comparisonofcornealthicknessmeasurementsusingultrasoundpachymetrynoncontacttonopachypentacamhrandfourierdomainoct
AT rhochangrae comparisonofcornealthicknessmeasurementsusingultrasoundpachymetrynoncontacttonopachypentacamhrandfourierdomainoct
AT choyeonwoo comparisonofcornealthicknessmeasurementsusingultrasoundpachymetrynoncontacttonopachypentacamhrandfourierdomainoct
AT shinjeongah comparisonofcornealthicknessmeasurementsusingultrasoundpachymetrynoncontacttonopachypentacamhrandfourierdomainoct