Cargando…
Cone parameters in different vision levels from the adaptive optics imaging
To investigate the relationship between visual resolution and cone parameters in eyes with different levels of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Seventeen eyes of 10 volunteers with BCVA of 20/12.5 or better (group 1) and 16 eyes of 10 volunteers with BCVA of 20/16 (group 2) were investigated in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8078260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33879731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025618 |
_version_ | 1783685022411128832 |
---|---|
author | Cheng, Huanhuan Ciuffreda, Kenneth J. Jiang, Huilu Zhou, Kun Lin, Sigeng Zheng, Jingwei Yu, Xinping Vasudevan, Balamurali Liang, Yuanbo |
author_facet | Cheng, Huanhuan Ciuffreda, Kenneth J. Jiang, Huilu Zhou, Kun Lin, Sigeng Zheng, Jingwei Yu, Xinping Vasudevan, Balamurali Liang, Yuanbo |
author_sort | Cheng, Huanhuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | To investigate the relationship between visual resolution and cone parameters in eyes with different levels of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Seventeen eyes of 10 volunteers with BCVA of 20/12.5 or better (group 1) and 16 eyes of 10 volunteers with BCVA of 20/16 (group 2) were investigated in the study. Images of the cone photoreceptors at 1.5(°) from the fovea were obtained using an adaptive optics (AO) retinal camera. The BCVA was obtained following a subjective refraction using a standardized logMAR visual acuity chart. The mean cone density (29,570.96 ± 2489.94 cells/mm(2)) at 1.5° from the fovea in group 1 (BCVA ≥ 20/12.5, n = 17) was significantly greater (P < .001) than that (22,963.59 ± 2987.92 cells/mm(2)) in group 2 (BCVA = 20/16, n = 16). The cone spacing at 1.5(°) from the fovea in group 1 was 6.45 ± 0.28 μm (mean ± SD), which was significantly smaller (P < .001) than 7.36 ± 0.50 μm (mean ± SD) in group 2. In the stepwise regression analysis, greater angular cone density (odds ratio [OR], 4.48; P = .005) and smaller angular cone spacing (OR, 0.60; P = .007) at 1.5(°) from the fovea were significantly associated with the better BCVA. The greater cone density and smaller cone spacing at the parafovea were found in eyes with BCVA of 20/12.5 or better, as compared to that in eyes with BCVA of 20/16. Knowledge of cone distribution for different BCVA levels may be beneficial for different clinical conditions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8078260 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80782602021-04-27 Cone parameters in different vision levels from the adaptive optics imaging Cheng, Huanhuan Ciuffreda, Kenneth J. Jiang, Huilu Zhou, Kun Lin, Sigeng Zheng, Jingwei Yu, Xinping Vasudevan, Balamurali Liang, Yuanbo Medicine (Baltimore) 5800 To investigate the relationship between visual resolution and cone parameters in eyes with different levels of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Seventeen eyes of 10 volunteers with BCVA of 20/12.5 or better (group 1) and 16 eyes of 10 volunteers with BCVA of 20/16 (group 2) were investigated in the study. Images of the cone photoreceptors at 1.5(°) from the fovea were obtained using an adaptive optics (AO) retinal camera. The BCVA was obtained following a subjective refraction using a standardized logMAR visual acuity chart. The mean cone density (29,570.96 ± 2489.94 cells/mm(2)) at 1.5° from the fovea in group 1 (BCVA ≥ 20/12.5, n = 17) was significantly greater (P < .001) than that (22,963.59 ± 2987.92 cells/mm(2)) in group 2 (BCVA = 20/16, n = 16). The cone spacing at 1.5(°) from the fovea in group 1 was 6.45 ± 0.28 μm (mean ± SD), which was significantly smaller (P < .001) than 7.36 ± 0.50 μm (mean ± SD) in group 2. In the stepwise regression analysis, greater angular cone density (odds ratio [OR], 4.48; P = .005) and smaller angular cone spacing (OR, 0.60; P = .007) at 1.5(°) from the fovea were significantly associated with the better BCVA. The greater cone density and smaller cone spacing at the parafovea were found in eyes with BCVA of 20/12.5 or better, as compared to that in eyes with BCVA of 20/16. Knowledge of cone distribution for different BCVA levels may be beneficial for different clinical conditions. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8078260/ /pubmed/33879731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025618 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | 5800 Cheng, Huanhuan Ciuffreda, Kenneth J. Jiang, Huilu Zhou, Kun Lin, Sigeng Zheng, Jingwei Yu, Xinping Vasudevan, Balamurali Liang, Yuanbo Cone parameters in different vision levels from the adaptive optics imaging |
title | Cone parameters in different vision levels from the adaptive optics imaging |
title_full | Cone parameters in different vision levels from the adaptive optics imaging |
title_fullStr | Cone parameters in different vision levels from the adaptive optics imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Cone parameters in different vision levels from the adaptive optics imaging |
title_short | Cone parameters in different vision levels from the adaptive optics imaging |
title_sort | cone parameters in different vision levels from the adaptive optics imaging |
topic | 5800 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8078260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33879731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025618 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenghuanhuan coneparametersindifferentvisionlevelsfromtheadaptiveopticsimaging AT ciuffredakennethj coneparametersindifferentvisionlevelsfromtheadaptiveopticsimaging AT jianghuilu coneparametersindifferentvisionlevelsfromtheadaptiveopticsimaging AT zhoukun coneparametersindifferentvisionlevelsfromtheadaptiveopticsimaging AT linsigeng coneparametersindifferentvisionlevelsfromtheadaptiveopticsimaging AT zhengjingwei coneparametersindifferentvisionlevelsfromtheadaptiveopticsimaging AT yuxinping coneparametersindifferentvisionlevelsfromtheadaptiveopticsimaging AT vasudevanbalamurali coneparametersindifferentvisionlevelsfromtheadaptiveopticsimaging AT liangyuanbo coneparametersindifferentvisionlevelsfromtheadaptiveopticsimaging |