Cargando…

Cone parameters in different vision levels from the adaptive optics imaging

To investigate the relationship between visual resolution and cone parameters in eyes with different levels of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Seventeen eyes of 10 volunteers with BCVA of 20/12.5 or better (group 1) and 16 eyes of 10 volunteers with BCVA of 20/16 (group 2) were investigated in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Huanhuan, Ciuffreda, Kenneth J., Jiang, Huilu, Zhou, Kun, Lin, Sigeng, Zheng, Jingwei, Yu, Xinping, Vasudevan, Balamurali, Liang, Yuanbo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8078260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33879731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025618
_version_ 1783685022411128832
author Cheng, Huanhuan
Ciuffreda, Kenneth J.
Jiang, Huilu
Zhou, Kun
Lin, Sigeng
Zheng, Jingwei
Yu, Xinping
Vasudevan, Balamurali
Liang, Yuanbo
author_facet Cheng, Huanhuan
Ciuffreda, Kenneth J.
Jiang, Huilu
Zhou, Kun
Lin, Sigeng
Zheng, Jingwei
Yu, Xinping
Vasudevan, Balamurali
Liang, Yuanbo
author_sort Cheng, Huanhuan
collection PubMed
description To investigate the relationship between visual resolution and cone parameters in eyes with different levels of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Seventeen eyes of 10 volunteers with BCVA of 20/12.5 or better (group 1) and 16 eyes of 10 volunteers with BCVA of 20/16 (group 2) were investigated in the study. Images of the cone photoreceptors at 1.5(°) from the fovea were obtained using an adaptive optics (AO) retinal camera. The BCVA was obtained following a subjective refraction using a standardized logMAR visual acuity chart. The mean cone density (29,570.96 ± 2489.94 cells/mm(2)) at 1.5° from the fovea in group 1 (BCVA ≥ 20/12.5, n = 17) was significantly greater (P < .001) than that (22,963.59 ± 2987.92 cells/mm(2)) in group 2 (BCVA = 20/16, n = 16). The cone spacing at 1.5(°) from the fovea in group 1 was 6.45 ± 0.28 μm (mean ± SD), which was significantly smaller (P < .001) than 7.36 ± 0.50 μm (mean ± SD) in group 2. In the stepwise regression analysis, greater angular cone density (odds ratio [OR], 4.48; P = .005) and smaller angular cone spacing (OR, 0.60; P = .007) at 1.5(°) from the fovea were significantly associated with the better BCVA. The greater cone density and smaller cone spacing at the parafovea were found in eyes with BCVA of 20/12.5 or better, as compared to that in eyes with BCVA of 20/16. Knowledge of cone distribution for different BCVA levels may be beneficial for different clinical conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8078260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80782602021-04-27 Cone parameters in different vision levels from the adaptive optics imaging Cheng, Huanhuan Ciuffreda, Kenneth J. Jiang, Huilu Zhou, Kun Lin, Sigeng Zheng, Jingwei Yu, Xinping Vasudevan, Balamurali Liang, Yuanbo Medicine (Baltimore) 5800 To investigate the relationship between visual resolution and cone parameters in eyes with different levels of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Seventeen eyes of 10 volunteers with BCVA of 20/12.5 or better (group 1) and 16 eyes of 10 volunteers with BCVA of 20/16 (group 2) were investigated in the study. Images of the cone photoreceptors at 1.5(°) from the fovea were obtained using an adaptive optics (AO) retinal camera. The BCVA was obtained following a subjective refraction using a standardized logMAR visual acuity chart. The mean cone density (29,570.96 ± 2489.94 cells/mm(2)) at 1.5° from the fovea in group 1 (BCVA ≥ 20/12.5, n = 17) was significantly greater (P < .001) than that (22,963.59 ± 2987.92 cells/mm(2)) in group 2 (BCVA = 20/16, n = 16). The cone spacing at 1.5(°) from the fovea in group 1 was 6.45 ± 0.28 μm (mean ± SD), which was significantly smaller (P < .001) than 7.36 ± 0.50 μm (mean ± SD) in group 2. In the stepwise regression analysis, greater angular cone density (odds ratio [OR], 4.48; P = .005) and smaller angular cone spacing (OR, 0.60; P = .007) at 1.5(°) from the fovea were significantly associated with the better BCVA. The greater cone density and smaller cone spacing at the parafovea were found in eyes with BCVA of 20/12.5 or better, as compared to that in eyes with BCVA of 20/16. Knowledge of cone distribution for different BCVA levels may be beneficial for different clinical conditions. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8078260/ /pubmed/33879731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025618 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle 5800
Cheng, Huanhuan
Ciuffreda, Kenneth J.
Jiang, Huilu
Zhou, Kun
Lin, Sigeng
Zheng, Jingwei
Yu, Xinping
Vasudevan, Balamurali
Liang, Yuanbo
Cone parameters in different vision levels from the adaptive optics imaging
title Cone parameters in different vision levels from the adaptive optics imaging
title_full Cone parameters in different vision levels from the adaptive optics imaging
title_fullStr Cone parameters in different vision levels from the adaptive optics imaging
title_full_unstemmed Cone parameters in different vision levels from the adaptive optics imaging
title_short Cone parameters in different vision levels from the adaptive optics imaging
title_sort cone parameters in different vision levels from the adaptive optics imaging
topic 5800
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8078260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33879731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000025618
work_keys_str_mv AT chenghuanhuan coneparametersindifferentvisionlevelsfromtheadaptiveopticsimaging
AT ciuffredakennethj coneparametersindifferentvisionlevelsfromtheadaptiveopticsimaging
AT jianghuilu coneparametersindifferentvisionlevelsfromtheadaptiveopticsimaging
AT zhoukun coneparametersindifferentvisionlevelsfromtheadaptiveopticsimaging
AT linsigeng coneparametersindifferentvisionlevelsfromtheadaptiveopticsimaging
AT zhengjingwei coneparametersindifferentvisionlevelsfromtheadaptiveopticsimaging
AT yuxinping coneparametersindifferentvisionlevelsfromtheadaptiveopticsimaging
AT vasudevanbalamurali coneparametersindifferentvisionlevelsfromtheadaptiveopticsimaging
AT liangyuanbo coneparametersindifferentvisionlevelsfromtheadaptiveopticsimaging