Cargando…

Randomized Phase III Study of FOLFOX Alone or With Pegilodecakin as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer That Progressed After Gemcitabine (SEQUOIA)

SEQUOIA compared efficacy and safety of adding pegilodecakin (PEG), a pegylated recombinant human interleukin (IL)-10, with folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) in patients following progression on first-line gemcitabine-containing therapy with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hecht, J. Randolph, Lonardi, Sara, Bendell, Johanna, Sim, Hao-Wen, Macarulla, Teresa, Lopez, Charles D., Van Cutsem, Eric, Muñoz Martin, Andres J., Park, Joon Oh, Greil, Richard, Wang, Hong, Hozak, Rebecca R., Gueorguieva, Ivelina, Lin, Yong, Rao, Sujata, Ryoo, Baek-Yeol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8078437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33555926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.02232
_version_ 1783685061261918208
author Hecht, J. Randolph
Lonardi, Sara
Bendell, Johanna
Sim, Hao-Wen
Macarulla, Teresa
Lopez, Charles D.
Van Cutsem, Eric
Muñoz Martin, Andres J.
Park, Joon Oh
Greil, Richard
Wang, Hong
Hozak, Rebecca R.
Gueorguieva, Ivelina
Lin, Yong
Rao, Sujata
Ryoo, Baek-Yeol
author_facet Hecht, J. Randolph
Lonardi, Sara
Bendell, Johanna
Sim, Hao-Wen
Macarulla, Teresa
Lopez, Charles D.
Van Cutsem, Eric
Muñoz Martin, Andres J.
Park, Joon Oh
Greil, Richard
Wang, Hong
Hozak, Rebecca R.
Gueorguieva, Ivelina
Lin, Yong
Rao, Sujata
Ryoo, Baek-Yeol
author_sort Hecht, J. Randolph
collection PubMed
description SEQUOIA compared efficacy and safety of adding pegilodecakin (PEG), a pegylated recombinant human interleukin (IL)-10, with folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) in patients following progression on first-line gemcitabine-containing therapy with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: SEQUOIA, a randomized, global phase III study, compared FOLFOX with PEG + FOLFOX as second line in gemcitabine-refractory PDAC. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 (PEG + FOLFOX:FOLFOX) and stratified by prior gemcitabine and region. Eligible patients had only one prior gemcitabine-containing treatment. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), response evaluation per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) 1.1, and safety. Exploratory analyses included biomarkers related to immune activation. RESULTS: Between March 1, 2017, and September 9, 2019, 567 patients were randomly assigned PEG + FOLFOX (n = 283) or FOLFOX (n = 284). Most (94.7%) patients received prior gemcitabine plus nab paclitaxel. OS was similar comparing PEG + FOLFOX versus FOLFOX (median: 5.8 v 6.3 months; hazard ratio = 1.045; 95% CI, 0.863 to 1.265). Also, PFS (median 2.1 v 2.1 months; hazard ratio = 0.981; 95% CI, 0.808 to 1.190) and objective response rate (4.6% v 5.6%) were similar between the treatment arms. Most common (≥ 35%) treatment-emergent adverse events in PEG + FOLFOX versus FOLFOX were thrombocytopenia (55% v 20%), anemia (40% v 16%), fatigue (61% v 45%), neutropenia (39% v 28%), abdominal pain (37% v 29%), nausea (45% v 41%), neuropathy (37% v 38%), and decreased appetite (35% v 31%). Exploratory analyses revealed increases in total IL-18, interferon (IFN)-γ, and granzyme B and decreases in transforming growth factor (TGF)-β with the addition of PEG. CONCLUSION: PEG added to FOLFOX did not improve efficacy in advanced gemcitabine-refractory PDAC. Safety findings were consistent as previously observed from PEG with chemotherapy; toxicity was manageable and tolerable. Exploratory pharmacodynamic results were consistent with immunostimulatory signals of the IL-10R pathway.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8078437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80784372022-04-01 Randomized Phase III Study of FOLFOX Alone or With Pegilodecakin as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer That Progressed After Gemcitabine (SEQUOIA) Hecht, J. Randolph Lonardi, Sara Bendell, Johanna Sim, Hao-Wen Macarulla, Teresa Lopez, Charles D. Van Cutsem, Eric Muñoz Martin, Andres J. Park, Joon Oh Greil, Richard Wang, Hong Hozak, Rebecca R. Gueorguieva, Ivelina Lin, Yong Rao, Sujata Ryoo, Baek-Yeol J Clin Oncol ORIGINAL REPORTS SEQUOIA compared efficacy and safety of adding pegilodecakin (PEG), a pegylated recombinant human interleukin (IL)-10, with folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) in patients following progression on first-line gemcitabine-containing therapy with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: SEQUOIA, a randomized, global phase III study, compared FOLFOX with PEG + FOLFOX as second line in gemcitabine-refractory PDAC. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 (PEG + FOLFOX:FOLFOX) and stratified by prior gemcitabine and region. Eligible patients had only one prior gemcitabine-containing treatment. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), response evaluation per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) 1.1, and safety. Exploratory analyses included biomarkers related to immune activation. RESULTS: Between March 1, 2017, and September 9, 2019, 567 patients were randomly assigned PEG + FOLFOX (n = 283) or FOLFOX (n = 284). Most (94.7%) patients received prior gemcitabine plus nab paclitaxel. OS was similar comparing PEG + FOLFOX versus FOLFOX (median: 5.8 v 6.3 months; hazard ratio = 1.045; 95% CI, 0.863 to 1.265). Also, PFS (median 2.1 v 2.1 months; hazard ratio = 0.981; 95% CI, 0.808 to 1.190) and objective response rate (4.6% v 5.6%) were similar between the treatment arms. Most common (≥ 35%) treatment-emergent adverse events in PEG + FOLFOX versus FOLFOX were thrombocytopenia (55% v 20%), anemia (40% v 16%), fatigue (61% v 45%), neutropenia (39% v 28%), abdominal pain (37% v 29%), nausea (45% v 41%), neuropathy (37% v 38%), and decreased appetite (35% v 31%). Exploratory analyses revealed increases in total IL-18, interferon (IFN)-γ, and granzyme B and decreases in transforming growth factor (TGF)-β with the addition of PEG. CONCLUSION: PEG added to FOLFOX did not improve efficacy in advanced gemcitabine-refractory PDAC. Safety findings were consistent as previously observed from PEG with chemotherapy; toxicity was manageable and tolerable. Exploratory pharmacodynamic results were consistent with immunostimulatory signals of the IL-10R pathway. Wolters Kluwer Health 2021-04-01 2021-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8078437/ /pubmed/33555926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.02232 Text en © 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle ORIGINAL REPORTS
Hecht, J. Randolph
Lonardi, Sara
Bendell, Johanna
Sim, Hao-Wen
Macarulla, Teresa
Lopez, Charles D.
Van Cutsem, Eric
Muñoz Martin, Andres J.
Park, Joon Oh
Greil, Richard
Wang, Hong
Hozak, Rebecca R.
Gueorguieva, Ivelina
Lin, Yong
Rao, Sujata
Ryoo, Baek-Yeol
Randomized Phase III Study of FOLFOX Alone or With Pegilodecakin as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer That Progressed After Gemcitabine (SEQUOIA)
title Randomized Phase III Study of FOLFOX Alone or With Pegilodecakin as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer That Progressed After Gemcitabine (SEQUOIA)
title_full Randomized Phase III Study of FOLFOX Alone or With Pegilodecakin as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer That Progressed After Gemcitabine (SEQUOIA)
title_fullStr Randomized Phase III Study of FOLFOX Alone or With Pegilodecakin as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer That Progressed After Gemcitabine (SEQUOIA)
title_full_unstemmed Randomized Phase III Study of FOLFOX Alone or With Pegilodecakin as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer That Progressed After Gemcitabine (SEQUOIA)
title_short Randomized Phase III Study of FOLFOX Alone or With Pegilodecakin as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer That Progressed After Gemcitabine (SEQUOIA)
title_sort randomized phase iii study of folfox alone or with pegilodecakin as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer that progressed after gemcitabine (sequoia)
topic ORIGINAL REPORTS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8078437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33555926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.02232
work_keys_str_mv AT hechtjrandolph randomizedphaseiiistudyoffolfoxaloneorwithpegilodecakinassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithmetastaticpancreaticcancerthatprogressedaftergemcitabinesequoia
AT lonardisara randomizedphaseiiistudyoffolfoxaloneorwithpegilodecakinassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithmetastaticpancreaticcancerthatprogressedaftergemcitabinesequoia
AT bendelljohanna randomizedphaseiiistudyoffolfoxaloneorwithpegilodecakinassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithmetastaticpancreaticcancerthatprogressedaftergemcitabinesequoia
AT simhaowen randomizedphaseiiistudyoffolfoxaloneorwithpegilodecakinassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithmetastaticpancreaticcancerthatprogressedaftergemcitabinesequoia
AT macarullateresa randomizedphaseiiistudyoffolfoxaloneorwithpegilodecakinassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithmetastaticpancreaticcancerthatprogressedaftergemcitabinesequoia
AT lopezcharlesd randomizedphaseiiistudyoffolfoxaloneorwithpegilodecakinassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithmetastaticpancreaticcancerthatprogressedaftergemcitabinesequoia
AT vancutsemeric randomizedphaseiiistudyoffolfoxaloneorwithpegilodecakinassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithmetastaticpancreaticcancerthatprogressedaftergemcitabinesequoia
AT munozmartinandresj randomizedphaseiiistudyoffolfoxaloneorwithpegilodecakinassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithmetastaticpancreaticcancerthatprogressedaftergemcitabinesequoia
AT parkjoonoh randomizedphaseiiistudyoffolfoxaloneorwithpegilodecakinassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithmetastaticpancreaticcancerthatprogressedaftergemcitabinesequoia
AT greilrichard randomizedphaseiiistudyoffolfoxaloneorwithpegilodecakinassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithmetastaticpancreaticcancerthatprogressedaftergemcitabinesequoia
AT wanghong randomizedphaseiiistudyoffolfoxaloneorwithpegilodecakinassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithmetastaticpancreaticcancerthatprogressedaftergemcitabinesequoia
AT hozakrebeccar randomizedphaseiiistudyoffolfoxaloneorwithpegilodecakinassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithmetastaticpancreaticcancerthatprogressedaftergemcitabinesequoia
AT gueorguievaivelina randomizedphaseiiistudyoffolfoxaloneorwithpegilodecakinassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithmetastaticpancreaticcancerthatprogressedaftergemcitabinesequoia
AT linyong randomizedphaseiiistudyoffolfoxaloneorwithpegilodecakinassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithmetastaticpancreaticcancerthatprogressedaftergemcitabinesequoia
AT raosujata randomizedphaseiiistudyoffolfoxaloneorwithpegilodecakinassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithmetastaticpancreaticcancerthatprogressedaftergemcitabinesequoia
AT ryoobaekyeol randomizedphaseiiistudyoffolfoxaloneorwithpegilodecakinassecondlinetherapyinpatientswithmetastaticpancreaticcancerthatprogressedaftergemcitabinesequoia