Cargando…

Comparison of 16-Channel Asymmetric Sleeve Antenna and Dipole Antenna Transceiver Arrays at 10.5 Tesla MRI

Multi-element transmit arrays with low peak 10 g specific absorption rate (SAR) and high SAR efficiency (defined as [Formula: see text] are essential for ultra-high field (UHF) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) applications. Recently, the adaptation of dipole antennas used as MRI coil elements in mul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woo, Myung Kyun, DelaBarre, Lance, Waks, Matt, Lee, Jingu, Lagore, Russell Luke, Jungst, Steve, Grant, Andrea, Eryaman, Yigitcan, Ugurbil, Kamil, Adriany, Gregor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8078892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33360987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2020.3047354
_version_ 1783685121352663040
author Woo, Myung Kyun
DelaBarre, Lance
Waks, Matt
Lee, Jingu
Lagore, Russell Luke
Jungst, Steve
Grant, Andrea
Eryaman, Yigitcan
Ugurbil, Kamil
Adriany, Gregor
author_facet Woo, Myung Kyun
DelaBarre, Lance
Waks, Matt
Lee, Jingu
Lagore, Russell Luke
Jungst, Steve
Grant, Andrea
Eryaman, Yigitcan
Ugurbil, Kamil
Adriany, Gregor
author_sort Woo, Myung Kyun
collection PubMed
description Multi-element transmit arrays with low peak 10 g specific absorption rate (SAR) and high SAR efficiency (defined as [Formula: see text] are essential for ultra-high field (UHF) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) applications. Recently, the adaptation of dipole antennas used as MRI coil elements in multi-channel arrays has provided the community with a technological solution capable of producing uniform images and low SAR efficiency at these high field strengths. However, human head-sized arrays consisting of dipole elements have a practical limitation to the number of channels that can be used due to radiofrequency (RF) coupling between the antenna elements, as well as, the coaxial cables necessary to connect them. Here we suggest an asymmetric sleeve antenna as an alternative to the dipole antenna. When used in an array as MRI coil elements, the asymmetric sleeve antenna can generate reduced peak 10 g SAR and improved SAR efficiency. To demonstrate the advantages of an array consisting of our suggested design, we compared various performance metrics produced by 16-channel arrays of asymmetric sleeve antennas and dipole antennas with the same dimensions. Comparison data were produced on a phantom in electromagnetic (EM) simulations and verified with experiments at 10.5 Tesla (T). The results produced by the 16-channel asymmetric sleeve antenna array demonstrated 28 % lower peak 10 g SAR and 18.6 % higher SAR efficiency when compared to the 16-channel dipole antenna array.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8078892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80788922021-04-27 Comparison of 16-Channel Asymmetric Sleeve Antenna and Dipole Antenna Transceiver Arrays at 10.5 Tesla MRI Woo, Myung Kyun DelaBarre, Lance Waks, Matt Lee, Jingu Lagore, Russell Luke Jungst, Steve Grant, Andrea Eryaman, Yigitcan Ugurbil, Kamil Adriany, Gregor IEEE Trans Med Imaging Article Multi-element transmit arrays with low peak 10 g specific absorption rate (SAR) and high SAR efficiency (defined as [Formula: see text] are essential for ultra-high field (UHF) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) applications. Recently, the adaptation of dipole antennas used as MRI coil elements in multi-channel arrays has provided the community with a technological solution capable of producing uniform images and low SAR efficiency at these high field strengths. However, human head-sized arrays consisting of dipole elements have a practical limitation to the number of channels that can be used due to radiofrequency (RF) coupling between the antenna elements, as well as, the coaxial cables necessary to connect them. Here we suggest an asymmetric sleeve antenna as an alternative to the dipole antenna. When used in an array as MRI coil elements, the asymmetric sleeve antenna can generate reduced peak 10 g SAR and improved SAR efficiency. To demonstrate the advantages of an array consisting of our suggested design, we compared various performance metrics produced by 16-channel arrays of asymmetric sleeve antennas and dipole antennas with the same dimensions. Comparison data were produced on a phantom in electromagnetic (EM) simulations and verified with experiments at 10.5 Tesla (T). The results produced by the 16-channel asymmetric sleeve antenna array demonstrated 28 % lower peak 10 g SAR and 18.6 % higher SAR efficiency when compared to the 16-channel dipole antenna array. 2021-04-01 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8078892/ /pubmed/33360987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2020.3047354 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. For more information, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Woo, Myung Kyun
DelaBarre, Lance
Waks, Matt
Lee, Jingu
Lagore, Russell Luke
Jungst, Steve
Grant, Andrea
Eryaman, Yigitcan
Ugurbil, Kamil
Adriany, Gregor
Comparison of 16-Channel Asymmetric Sleeve Antenna and Dipole Antenna Transceiver Arrays at 10.5 Tesla MRI
title Comparison of 16-Channel Asymmetric Sleeve Antenna and Dipole Antenna Transceiver Arrays at 10.5 Tesla MRI
title_full Comparison of 16-Channel Asymmetric Sleeve Antenna and Dipole Antenna Transceiver Arrays at 10.5 Tesla MRI
title_fullStr Comparison of 16-Channel Asymmetric Sleeve Antenna and Dipole Antenna Transceiver Arrays at 10.5 Tesla MRI
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of 16-Channel Asymmetric Sleeve Antenna and Dipole Antenna Transceiver Arrays at 10.5 Tesla MRI
title_short Comparison of 16-Channel Asymmetric Sleeve Antenna and Dipole Antenna Transceiver Arrays at 10.5 Tesla MRI
title_sort comparison of 16-channel asymmetric sleeve antenna and dipole antenna transceiver arrays at 10.5 tesla mri
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8078892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33360987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2020.3047354
work_keys_str_mv AT woomyungkyun comparisonof16channelasymmetricsleeveantennaanddipoleantennatransceiverarraysat105teslamri
AT delabarrelance comparisonof16channelasymmetricsleeveantennaanddipoleantennatransceiverarraysat105teslamri
AT waksmatt comparisonof16channelasymmetricsleeveantennaanddipoleantennatransceiverarraysat105teslamri
AT leejingu comparisonof16channelasymmetricsleeveantennaanddipoleantennatransceiverarraysat105teslamri
AT lagorerussellluke comparisonof16channelasymmetricsleeveantennaanddipoleantennatransceiverarraysat105teslamri
AT jungststeve comparisonof16channelasymmetricsleeveantennaanddipoleantennatransceiverarraysat105teslamri
AT grantandrea comparisonof16channelasymmetricsleeveantennaanddipoleantennatransceiverarraysat105teslamri
AT eryamanyigitcan comparisonof16channelasymmetricsleeveantennaanddipoleantennatransceiverarraysat105teslamri
AT ugurbilkamil comparisonof16channelasymmetricsleeveantennaanddipoleantennatransceiverarraysat105teslamri
AT adrianygregor comparisonof16channelasymmetricsleeveantennaanddipoleantennatransceiverarraysat105teslamri