Cargando…

Safety and immunogenicity of one versus two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2 for patients with cancer: interim analysis of a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety profiles of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with cancer is unknown. We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) vaccine in patients with cancer. METHODS: For this prospective observational study, we recruited patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monin, Leticia, Laing, Adam G, Muñoz-Ruiz, Miguel, McKenzie, Duncan R, del Molino del Barrio, Irene, Alaguthurai, Thanussuyah, Domingo-Vila, Clara, Hayday, Thomas S, Graham, Carl, Seow, Jeffrey, Abdul-Jawad, Sultan, Kamdar, Shraddha, Harvey-Jones, Elizabeth, Graham, Rosalind, Cooper, Jack, Khan, Muhammad, Vidler, Jennifer, Kakkassery, Helen, Sinha, Shubhankar, Davis, Richard, Dupont, Liane, Francos Quijorna, Isaac, O'Brien-Gore, Charlotte, Lee, Puay Ling, Eum, Josephine, Conde Poole, Maria, Joseph, Magdalene, Davies, Daniel, Wu, Yin, Swampillai, Angela, North, Bernard V, Montes, Ana, Harries, Mark, Rigg, Anne, Spicer, James, Malim, Michael H, Fields, Paul, Patten, Piers, Di Rosa, Francesca, Papa, Sophie, Tree, Timothy, Doores, Katie J, Hayday, Adrian C, Irshad, Sheeba
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lancet Pub. Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8078907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33930323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00213-8
_version_ 1783685124913627136
author Monin, Leticia
Laing, Adam G
Muñoz-Ruiz, Miguel
McKenzie, Duncan R
del Molino del Barrio, Irene
Alaguthurai, Thanussuyah
Domingo-Vila, Clara
Hayday, Thomas S
Graham, Carl
Seow, Jeffrey
Abdul-Jawad, Sultan
Kamdar, Shraddha
Harvey-Jones, Elizabeth
Graham, Rosalind
Cooper, Jack
Khan, Muhammad
Vidler, Jennifer
Kakkassery, Helen
Sinha, Shubhankar
Davis, Richard
Dupont, Liane
Francos Quijorna, Isaac
O'Brien-Gore, Charlotte
Lee, Puay Ling
Eum, Josephine
Conde Poole, Maria
Joseph, Magdalene
Davies, Daniel
Wu, Yin
Swampillai, Angela
North, Bernard V
Montes, Ana
Harries, Mark
Rigg, Anne
Spicer, James
Malim, Michael H
Fields, Paul
Patten, Piers
Di Rosa, Francesca
Papa, Sophie
Tree, Timothy
Doores, Katie J
Hayday, Adrian C
Irshad, Sheeba
author_facet Monin, Leticia
Laing, Adam G
Muñoz-Ruiz, Miguel
McKenzie, Duncan R
del Molino del Barrio, Irene
Alaguthurai, Thanussuyah
Domingo-Vila, Clara
Hayday, Thomas S
Graham, Carl
Seow, Jeffrey
Abdul-Jawad, Sultan
Kamdar, Shraddha
Harvey-Jones, Elizabeth
Graham, Rosalind
Cooper, Jack
Khan, Muhammad
Vidler, Jennifer
Kakkassery, Helen
Sinha, Shubhankar
Davis, Richard
Dupont, Liane
Francos Quijorna, Isaac
O'Brien-Gore, Charlotte
Lee, Puay Ling
Eum, Josephine
Conde Poole, Maria
Joseph, Magdalene
Davies, Daniel
Wu, Yin
Swampillai, Angela
North, Bernard V
Montes, Ana
Harries, Mark
Rigg, Anne
Spicer, James
Malim, Michael H
Fields, Paul
Patten, Piers
Di Rosa, Francesca
Papa, Sophie
Tree, Timothy
Doores, Katie J
Hayday, Adrian C
Irshad, Sheeba
author_sort Monin, Leticia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety profiles of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with cancer is unknown. We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) vaccine in patients with cancer. METHODS: For this prospective observational study, we recruited patients with cancer and healthy controls (mostly health-care workers) from three London hospitals between Dec 8, 2020, and Feb 18, 2021. Participants who were vaccinated between Dec 8 and Dec 29, 2020, received two 30 μg doses of BNT162b2 administered intramuscularly 21 days apart; patients vaccinated after this date received only one 30 μg dose with a planned follow-up boost at 12 weeks. Blood samples were taken before vaccination and at 3 weeks and 5 weeks after the first vaccination. Where possible, serial nasopharyngeal real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) swab tests were done every 10 days or in cases of symptomatic COVID-19. The coprimary endpoints were seroconversion to SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein in patients with cancer following the first vaccination with the BNT162b2 vaccine and the effect of vaccine boosting after 21 days on seroconversion. All participants with available data were included in the safety and immunogenicity analyses. Ongoing follow-up is underway for further blood sampling after the delayed (12-week) vaccine boost. This study is registered with the NHS Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales (REC ID 20/HRA/2031). FINDINGS: 151 patients with cancer (95 patients with solid cancer and 56 patients with haematological cancer) and 54 healthy controls were enrolled. For this interim data analysis of the safety and immunogenicity of vaccinated patients with cancer, samples and data obtained up to March 19, 2021, were analysed. After exclusion of 17 patients who had been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 (detected by either antibody seroconversion or a positive rRT-PCR COVID-19 swab test) from the immunogenicity analysis, the proportion of positive anti-S IgG titres at approximately 21 days following a single vaccine inoculum across the three cohorts were 32 (94%; 95% CI 81–98) of 34 healthy controls; 21 (38%; 26–51) of 56 patients with solid cancer, and eight (18%; 10–32) of 44 patients with haematological cancer. 16 healthy controls, 25 patients with solid cancer, and six patients with haematological cancer received a second dose on day 21. Of the patients with available blood samples 2 weeks following a 21-day vaccine boost, and excluding 17 participants with evidence of previous natural SARS-CoV-2 exposure, 18 (95%; 95% CI 75–99) of 19 patients with solid cancer, 12 (100%; 76–100) of 12 healthy controls, and three (60%; 23–88) of five patients with haematological cancers were seropositive, compared with ten (30%; 17–47) of 33, 18 (86%; 65–95) of 21, and four (11%; 4–25) of 36, respectively, who did not receive a boost. The vaccine was well tolerated; no toxicities were reported in 75 (54%) of 140 patients with cancer following the first dose of BNT162b2, and in 22 (71%) of 31 patients with cancer following the second dose. Similarly, no toxicities were reported in 15 (38%) of 40 healthy controls after the first dose and in five (31%) of 16 after the second dose. Injection-site pain within 7 days following the first dose was the most commonly reported local reaction (23 [35%] of 65 patients with cancer; 12 [48%] of 25 healthy controls). No vaccine-related deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION: In patients with cancer, one dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine yields poor efficacy. Immunogenicity increased significantly in patients with solid cancer within 2 weeks of a vaccine boost at day 21 after the first dose. These data support prioritisation of patients with cancer for an early (day 21) second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine. FUNDING: King's College London, Cancer Research UK, Wellcome Trust, Rosetrees Trust, and Francis Crick Institute.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8078907
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lancet Pub. Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80789072021-04-28 Safety and immunogenicity of one versus two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2 for patients with cancer: interim analysis of a prospective observational study Monin, Leticia Laing, Adam G Muñoz-Ruiz, Miguel McKenzie, Duncan R del Molino del Barrio, Irene Alaguthurai, Thanussuyah Domingo-Vila, Clara Hayday, Thomas S Graham, Carl Seow, Jeffrey Abdul-Jawad, Sultan Kamdar, Shraddha Harvey-Jones, Elizabeth Graham, Rosalind Cooper, Jack Khan, Muhammad Vidler, Jennifer Kakkassery, Helen Sinha, Shubhankar Davis, Richard Dupont, Liane Francos Quijorna, Isaac O'Brien-Gore, Charlotte Lee, Puay Ling Eum, Josephine Conde Poole, Maria Joseph, Magdalene Davies, Daniel Wu, Yin Swampillai, Angela North, Bernard V Montes, Ana Harries, Mark Rigg, Anne Spicer, James Malim, Michael H Fields, Paul Patten, Piers Di Rosa, Francesca Papa, Sophie Tree, Timothy Doores, Katie J Hayday, Adrian C Irshad, Sheeba Lancet Oncol Articles BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety profiles of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with cancer is unknown. We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) vaccine in patients with cancer. METHODS: For this prospective observational study, we recruited patients with cancer and healthy controls (mostly health-care workers) from three London hospitals between Dec 8, 2020, and Feb 18, 2021. Participants who were vaccinated between Dec 8 and Dec 29, 2020, received two 30 μg doses of BNT162b2 administered intramuscularly 21 days apart; patients vaccinated after this date received only one 30 μg dose with a planned follow-up boost at 12 weeks. Blood samples were taken before vaccination and at 3 weeks and 5 weeks after the first vaccination. Where possible, serial nasopharyngeal real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) swab tests were done every 10 days or in cases of symptomatic COVID-19. The coprimary endpoints were seroconversion to SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein in patients with cancer following the first vaccination with the BNT162b2 vaccine and the effect of vaccine boosting after 21 days on seroconversion. All participants with available data were included in the safety and immunogenicity analyses. Ongoing follow-up is underway for further blood sampling after the delayed (12-week) vaccine boost. This study is registered with the NHS Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales (REC ID 20/HRA/2031). FINDINGS: 151 patients with cancer (95 patients with solid cancer and 56 patients with haematological cancer) and 54 healthy controls were enrolled. For this interim data analysis of the safety and immunogenicity of vaccinated patients with cancer, samples and data obtained up to March 19, 2021, were analysed. After exclusion of 17 patients who had been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 (detected by either antibody seroconversion or a positive rRT-PCR COVID-19 swab test) from the immunogenicity analysis, the proportion of positive anti-S IgG titres at approximately 21 days following a single vaccine inoculum across the three cohorts were 32 (94%; 95% CI 81–98) of 34 healthy controls; 21 (38%; 26–51) of 56 patients with solid cancer, and eight (18%; 10–32) of 44 patients with haematological cancer. 16 healthy controls, 25 patients with solid cancer, and six patients with haematological cancer received a second dose on day 21. Of the patients with available blood samples 2 weeks following a 21-day vaccine boost, and excluding 17 participants with evidence of previous natural SARS-CoV-2 exposure, 18 (95%; 95% CI 75–99) of 19 patients with solid cancer, 12 (100%; 76–100) of 12 healthy controls, and three (60%; 23–88) of five patients with haematological cancers were seropositive, compared with ten (30%; 17–47) of 33, 18 (86%; 65–95) of 21, and four (11%; 4–25) of 36, respectively, who did not receive a boost. The vaccine was well tolerated; no toxicities were reported in 75 (54%) of 140 patients with cancer following the first dose of BNT162b2, and in 22 (71%) of 31 patients with cancer following the second dose. Similarly, no toxicities were reported in 15 (38%) of 40 healthy controls after the first dose and in five (31%) of 16 after the second dose. Injection-site pain within 7 days following the first dose was the most commonly reported local reaction (23 [35%] of 65 patients with cancer; 12 [48%] of 25 healthy controls). No vaccine-related deaths were reported. INTERPRETATION: In patients with cancer, one dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine yields poor efficacy. Immunogenicity increased significantly in patients with solid cancer within 2 weeks of a vaccine boost at day 21 after the first dose. These data support prioritisation of patients with cancer for an early (day 21) second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine. FUNDING: King's College London, Cancer Research UK, Wellcome Trust, Rosetrees Trust, and Francis Crick Institute. Lancet Pub. Group 2021-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8078907/ /pubmed/33930323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00213-8 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Monin, Leticia
Laing, Adam G
Muñoz-Ruiz, Miguel
McKenzie, Duncan R
del Molino del Barrio, Irene
Alaguthurai, Thanussuyah
Domingo-Vila, Clara
Hayday, Thomas S
Graham, Carl
Seow, Jeffrey
Abdul-Jawad, Sultan
Kamdar, Shraddha
Harvey-Jones, Elizabeth
Graham, Rosalind
Cooper, Jack
Khan, Muhammad
Vidler, Jennifer
Kakkassery, Helen
Sinha, Shubhankar
Davis, Richard
Dupont, Liane
Francos Quijorna, Isaac
O'Brien-Gore, Charlotte
Lee, Puay Ling
Eum, Josephine
Conde Poole, Maria
Joseph, Magdalene
Davies, Daniel
Wu, Yin
Swampillai, Angela
North, Bernard V
Montes, Ana
Harries, Mark
Rigg, Anne
Spicer, James
Malim, Michael H
Fields, Paul
Patten, Piers
Di Rosa, Francesca
Papa, Sophie
Tree, Timothy
Doores, Katie J
Hayday, Adrian C
Irshad, Sheeba
Safety and immunogenicity of one versus two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2 for patients with cancer: interim analysis of a prospective observational study
title Safety and immunogenicity of one versus two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2 for patients with cancer: interim analysis of a prospective observational study
title_full Safety and immunogenicity of one versus two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2 for patients with cancer: interim analysis of a prospective observational study
title_fullStr Safety and immunogenicity of one versus two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2 for patients with cancer: interim analysis of a prospective observational study
title_full_unstemmed Safety and immunogenicity of one versus two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2 for patients with cancer: interim analysis of a prospective observational study
title_short Safety and immunogenicity of one versus two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2 for patients with cancer: interim analysis of a prospective observational study
title_sort safety and immunogenicity of one versus two doses of the covid-19 vaccine bnt162b2 for patients with cancer: interim analysis of a prospective observational study
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8078907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33930323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00213-8
work_keys_str_mv AT moninleticia safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT laingadamg safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT munozruizmiguel safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT mckenzieduncanr safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT delmolinodelbarrioirene safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT alaguthuraithanussuyah safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT domingovilaclara safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT haydaythomass safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT grahamcarl safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT seowjeffrey safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT abduljawadsultan safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT kamdarshraddha safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT harveyjoneselizabeth safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT grahamrosalind safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT cooperjack safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT khanmuhammad safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT vidlerjennifer safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT kakkasseryhelen safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT sinhashubhankar safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT davisrichard safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT dupontliane safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT francosquijornaisaac safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT obriengorecharlotte safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT leepuayling safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT eumjosephine safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT condepoolemaria safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT josephmagdalene safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT daviesdaniel safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT wuyin safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT swampillaiangela safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT northbernardv safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT montesana safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT harriesmark safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT rigganne safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT spicerjames safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT malimmichaelh safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT fieldspaul safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT pattenpiers safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT dirosafrancesca safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT papasophie safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT treetimothy safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT dooreskatiej safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT haydayadrianc safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT irshadsheeba safetyandimmunogenicityofoneversustwodosesofthecovid19vaccinebnt162b2forpatientswithcancerinterimanalysisofaprospectiveobservationalstudy