Cargando…

Nutritional risk index is a better predictor of early mortality than conventional nutritional markers after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Nutritional risk index (NRI) has been shown to better predict survival than body mass index (BMI) or albumin after several cardiovascular interventions. Under assessment herein is whether NRI can have higher predictive value than conventional parameters for short-term survival after tran...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mas-Peiro, Silvia, Papadopoulos, Nestoras, Walther, Thomas, Zeiher, Andreas M., Fichtlscherer, Stephan, Vasa-Nicotera, Mariuca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Via Medica 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8078940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30994180
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2019.0038
_version_ 1783685132283019264
author Mas-Peiro, Silvia
Papadopoulos, Nestoras
Walther, Thomas
Zeiher, Andreas M.
Fichtlscherer, Stephan
Vasa-Nicotera, Mariuca
author_facet Mas-Peiro, Silvia
Papadopoulos, Nestoras
Walther, Thomas
Zeiher, Andreas M.
Fichtlscherer, Stephan
Vasa-Nicotera, Mariuca
author_sort Mas-Peiro, Silvia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nutritional risk index (NRI) has been shown to better predict survival than body mass index (BMI) or albumin after several cardiovascular interventions. Under assessment herein is whether NRI can have higher predictive value than conventional parameters for short-term survival after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed. In-hospital, 1-month and 3-month survival was evaluated. Since most patients undergoing TAVR are over 65, the NRI definition for a geriatric population (GNRI) was used. The impact of baseline BMI, albumin levels, and GNRI on in-hospital and short-term survival was assessed. RESULTS: One hundred fifty two patients aged 82 ± 5.4 were included. In-hospital, 1-month, and 3-month mortality was 5.3%, 5.9%, and 9.2%, respectively. Mean GNRI was 112.7 ± 11.9, and was significantly lower in patients who died in-hospital (101.0 ± 8.8 vs. 113.3 ± 11.7), at 30 days (103.4 ± 10.9 vs. 113.3 ± 11.7), and at 90 days (104.0 ± 9.6 vs. 113.6 ± 11.8) than in survivors (all, p < 0.05). Three-month mortality in patients with no nutritional risk was 6.8% (9/132) vs. 25% (5/20) in patients with malnutrition (p = 0.022). In univariate analysis, GNRI predicted in-hospital, 30-day, and 90-day mortality (all, p < 0.05). Predictive value remained significant after adjusting for age, EuroSCORE II, and STS-Score (p < 0.05). Based on receiver operating curves, GNRI (AUC: 0.73) showed a better discrimination for 3-month mortality than albumin (0.69), weight (0.67) or BMI (0.62). The optimal cut-off value was 109.8. CONCLUSIONS: The geriatric nutritional risk index predicts short-term mortality after TAVR and has a higher discriminating ability than other commonly used nutritional variables. It is a simple parameter that identifies those patients who could benefit from pre-procedural nutritional therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8078940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Via Medica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80789402021-05-10 Nutritional risk index is a better predictor of early mortality than conventional nutritional markers after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A prospective cohort study Mas-Peiro, Silvia Papadopoulos, Nestoras Walther, Thomas Zeiher, Andreas M. Fichtlscherer, Stephan Vasa-Nicotera, Mariuca Cardiol J Clinical Cardiology BACKGROUND: Nutritional risk index (NRI) has been shown to better predict survival than body mass index (BMI) or albumin after several cardiovascular interventions. Under assessment herein is whether NRI can have higher predictive value than conventional parameters for short-term survival after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed. In-hospital, 1-month and 3-month survival was evaluated. Since most patients undergoing TAVR are over 65, the NRI definition for a geriatric population (GNRI) was used. The impact of baseline BMI, albumin levels, and GNRI on in-hospital and short-term survival was assessed. RESULTS: One hundred fifty two patients aged 82 ± 5.4 were included. In-hospital, 1-month, and 3-month mortality was 5.3%, 5.9%, and 9.2%, respectively. Mean GNRI was 112.7 ± 11.9, and was significantly lower in patients who died in-hospital (101.0 ± 8.8 vs. 113.3 ± 11.7), at 30 days (103.4 ± 10.9 vs. 113.3 ± 11.7), and at 90 days (104.0 ± 9.6 vs. 113.6 ± 11.8) than in survivors (all, p < 0.05). Three-month mortality in patients with no nutritional risk was 6.8% (9/132) vs. 25% (5/20) in patients with malnutrition (p = 0.022). In univariate analysis, GNRI predicted in-hospital, 30-day, and 90-day mortality (all, p < 0.05). Predictive value remained significant after adjusting for age, EuroSCORE II, and STS-Score (p < 0.05). Based on receiver operating curves, GNRI (AUC: 0.73) showed a better discrimination for 3-month mortality than albumin (0.69), weight (0.67) or BMI (0.62). The optimal cut-off value was 109.8. CONCLUSIONS: The geriatric nutritional risk index predicts short-term mortality after TAVR and has a higher discriminating ability than other commonly used nutritional variables. It is a simple parameter that identifies those patients who could benefit from pre-procedural nutritional therapy. Via Medica 2021-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8078940/ /pubmed/30994180 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2019.0038 Text en Copyright © 2021 Via Medica https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially.
spellingShingle Clinical Cardiology
Mas-Peiro, Silvia
Papadopoulos, Nestoras
Walther, Thomas
Zeiher, Andreas M.
Fichtlscherer, Stephan
Vasa-Nicotera, Mariuca
Nutritional risk index is a better predictor of early mortality than conventional nutritional markers after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A prospective cohort study
title Nutritional risk index is a better predictor of early mortality than conventional nutritional markers after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A prospective cohort study
title_full Nutritional risk index is a better predictor of early mortality than conventional nutritional markers after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Nutritional risk index is a better predictor of early mortality than conventional nutritional markers after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Nutritional risk index is a better predictor of early mortality than conventional nutritional markers after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A prospective cohort study
title_short Nutritional risk index is a better predictor of early mortality than conventional nutritional markers after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A prospective cohort study
title_sort nutritional risk index is a better predictor of early mortality than conventional nutritional markers after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective cohort study
topic Clinical Cardiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8078940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30994180
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2019.0038
work_keys_str_mv AT maspeirosilvia nutritionalriskindexisabetterpredictorofearlymortalitythanconventionalnutritionalmarkersaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementaprospectivecohortstudy
AT papadopoulosnestoras nutritionalriskindexisabetterpredictorofearlymortalitythanconventionalnutritionalmarkersaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementaprospectivecohortstudy
AT waltherthomas nutritionalriskindexisabetterpredictorofearlymortalitythanconventionalnutritionalmarkersaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementaprospectivecohortstudy
AT zeiherandreasm nutritionalriskindexisabetterpredictorofearlymortalitythanconventionalnutritionalmarkersaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementaprospectivecohortstudy
AT fichtlschererstephan nutritionalriskindexisabetterpredictorofearlymortalitythanconventionalnutritionalmarkersaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementaprospectivecohortstudy
AT vasanicoteramariuca nutritionalriskindexisabetterpredictorofearlymortalitythanconventionalnutritionalmarkersaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementaprospectivecohortstudy