Cargando…

Dose constraints for whole breast radiation therapy based on the quality assessment of treatment plans in the randomised Danish breast cancer group (DBCG) HYPO trial

PURPOSE: Quality assessment of the treatment plans in the Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) HYPO trial was carried out based on prospectively reported dosimetric parameters and evidence-based dose constraints for whole breast radiation therapy were derived. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2009 to 2014,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomsen, M.S., Berg, M., Zimmermann, S., Lutz, C.M., Makocki, S., Jensen, I., Hjelstuen, M.H.B., Pensold, S., Hasler, M.P., Jensen, M.-B., Offersen, B.V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8079332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33937532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2021.03.009
_version_ 1783685205483061248
author Thomsen, M.S.
Berg, M.
Zimmermann, S.
Lutz, C.M.
Makocki, S.
Jensen, I.
Hjelstuen, M.H.B.
Pensold, S.
Hasler, M.P.
Jensen, M.-B.
Offersen, B.V.
author_facet Thomsen, M.S.
Berg, M.
Zimmermann, S.
Lutz, C.M.
Makocki, S.
Jensen, I.
Hjelstuen, M.H.B.
Pensold, S.
Hasler, M.P.
Jensen, M.-B.
Offersen, B.V.
author_sort Thomsen, M.S.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Quality assessment of the treatment plans in the Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) HYPO trial was carried out based on prospectively reported dosimetric parameters and evidence-based dose constraints for whole breast radiation therapy were derived. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2009 to 2014, 1882 patients (pts) were randomised between 50 Gy/25fractions (fr) versus 40 Gy/15fr. Doses to CTVp_breast (V(95%), V(107%)-V(110%), D(max), and in addition for 40 Gy plans V(105%)-V(107%)), ipsilateral lung (V(20Gy)/V(17Gy)), heart (V(20Gy)/V(17Gy,) V(40Gy)/V(35Gy)), and left anterior descending coronary artery (LADCA) (D(max)) and use of respiratory gated technique were prospectively reported to the DBCG database. After end of accrual, these dosimetric parameters from all plans in the trial were compared to the pre-specified treatment constraints. RESULTS: In total, 1854 pts from eight radiation therapy (RT) centres in three countries were treated. No statistically significant differences were found between the results for 40 Gy and 50 Gy plans, except for CTVp_breast hot-spot volume (V(107%)-V(110%)). Of the 40 Gy pts, 90% with CTVp_breast > 600 mL and 95% with CTVp_breast ≤ 600 mL had a CTVp_breast hot-spot volume (V(105%)-V(107%)) <2%. In 95% of the 50 Gy plans, the CTVp_breast absolute hot-spot volume (V(107%)-V(110%)) was <0.5 mL and 1.7 mL for CTVp_breast ≤ 600 mL and > 600 mL, respectively. Compliance was >99% for both heart and lung constraints. Largest deviation from protocol constraints was found for the volume of CTVp_breast covered with 95% of the prescription dose or more (V(95%)). The CTV dose coverage (V(95%)) was >94.3% in 95% of the right-sided pts, whereas the figures for 95% of the left-sided pts treated with and without respiratory gating were 93.2% and 88.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: A high degree of compliance with protocol dose constraints was found for treatment plans in the DBCG HYPO trial. New constraints for dose to organs at risk and high-dose volumes in the breast are suggested for breast-only RT planning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8079332
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80793322021-04-29 Dose constraints for whole breast radiation therapy based on the quality assessment of treatment plans in the randomised Danish breast cancer group (DBCG) HYPO trial Thomsen, M.S. Berg, M. Zimmermann, S. Lutz, C.M. Makocki, S. Jensen, I. Hjelstuen, M.H.B. Pensold, S. Hasler, M.P. Jensen, M.-B. Offersen, B.V. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Original Research Article PURPOSE: Quality assessment of the treatment plans in the Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) HYPO trial was carried out based on prospectively reported dosimetric parameters and evidence-based dose constraints for whole breast radiation therapy were derived. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2009 to 2014, 1882 patients (pts) were randomised between 50 Gy/25fractions (fr) versus 40 Gy/15fr. Doses to CTVp_breast (V(95%), V(107%)-V(110%), D(max), and in addition for 40 Gy plans V(105%)-V(107%)), ipsilateral lung (V(20Gy)/V(17Gy)), heart (V(20Gy)/V(17Gy,) V(40Gy)/V(35Gy)), and left anterior descending coronary artery (LADCA) (D(max)) and use of respiratory gated technique were prospectively reported to the DBCG database. After end of accrual, these dosimetric parameters from all plans in the trial were compared to the pre-specified treatment constraints. RESULTS: In total, 1854 pts from eight radiation therapy (RT) centres in three countries were treated. No statistically significant differences were found between the results for 40 Gy and 50 Gy plans, except for CTVp_breast hot-spot volume (V(107%)-V(110%)). Of the 40 Gy pts, 90% with CTVp_breast > 600 mL and 95% with CTVp_breast ≤ 600 mL had a CTVp_breast hot-spot volume (V(105%)-V(107%)) <2%. In 95% of the 50 Gy plans, the CTVp_breast absolute hot-spot volume (V(107%)-V(110%)) was <0.5 mL and 1.7 mL for CTVp_breast ≤ 600 mL and > 600 mL, respectively. Compliance was >99% for both heart and lung constraints. Largest deviation from protocol constraints was found for the volume of CTVp_breast covered with 95% of the prescription dose or more (V(95%)). The CTV dose coverage (V(95%)) was >94.3% in 95% of the right-sided pts, whereas the figures for 95% of the left-sided pts treated with and without respiratory gating were 93.2% and 88.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: A high degree of compliance with protocol dose constraints was found for treatment plans in the DBCG HYPO trial. New constraints for dose to organs at risk and high-dose volumes in the breast are suggested for breast-only RT planning. Elsevier 2021-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8079332/ /pubmed/33937532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2021.03.009 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Thomsen, M.S.
Berg, M.
Zimmermann, S.
Lutz, C.M.
Makocki, S.
Jensen, I.
Hjelstuen, M.H.B.
Pensold, S.
Hasler, M.P.
Jensen, M.-B.
Offersen, B.V.
Dose constraints for whole breast radiation therapy based on the quality assessment of treatment plans in the randomised Danish breast cancer group (DBCG) HYPO trial
title Dose constraints for whole breast radiation therapy based on the quality assessment of treatment plans in the randomised Danish breast cancer group (DBCG) HYPO trial
title_full Dose constraints for whole breast radiation therapy based on the quality assessment of treatment plans in the randomised Danish breast cancer group (DBCG) HYPO trial
title_fullStr Dose constraints for whole breast radiation therapy based on the quality assessment of treatment plans in the randomised Danish breast cancer group (DBCG) HYPO trial
title_full_unstemmed Dose constraints for whole breast radiation therapy based on the quality assessment of treatment plans in the randomised Danish breast cancer group (DBCG) HYPO trial
title_short Dose constraints for whole breast radiation therapy based on the quality assessment of treatment plans in the randomised Danish breast cancer group (DBCG) HYPO trial
title_sort dose constraints for whole breast radiation therapy based on the quality assessment of treatment plans in the randomised danish breast cancer group (dbcg) hypo trial
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8079332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33937532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2021.03.009
work_keys_str_mv AT thomsenms doseconstraintsforwholebreastradiationtherapybasedonthequalityassessmentoftreatmentplansintherandomiseddanishbreastcancergroupdbcghypotrial
AT bergm doseconstraintsforwholebreastradiationtherapybasedonthequalityassessmentoftreatmentplansintherandomiseddanishbreastcancergroupdbcghypotrial
AT zimmermanns doseconstraintsforwholebreastradiationtherapybasedonthequalityassessmentoftreatmentplansintherandomiseddanishbreastcancergroupdbcghypotrial
AT lutzcm doseconstraintsforwholebreastradiationtherapybasedonthequalityassessmentoftreatmentplansintherandomiseddanishbreastcancergroupdbcghypotrial
AT makockis doseconstraintsforwholebreastradiationtherapybasedonthequalityassessmentoftreatmentplansintherandomiseddanishbreastcancergroupdbcghypotrial
AT jenseni doseconstraintsforwholebreastradiationtherapybasedonthequalityassessmentoftreatmentplansintherandomiseddanishbreastcancergroupdbcghypotrial
AT hjelstuenmhb doseconstraintsforwholebreastradiationtherapybasedonthequalityassessmentoftreatmentplansintherandomiseddanishbreastcancergroupdbcghypotrial
AT pensolds doseconstraintsforwholebreastradiationtherapybasedonthequalityassessmentoftreatmentplansintherandomiseddanishbreastcancergroupdbcghypotrial
AT haslermp doseconstraintsforwholebreastradiationtherapybasedonthequalityassessmentoftreatmentplansintherandomiseddanishbreastcancergroupdbcghypotrial
AT jensenmb doseconstraintsforwholebreastradiationtherapybasedonthequalityassessmentoftreatmentplansintherandomiseddanishbreastcancergroupdbcghypotrial
AT offersenbv doseconstraintsforwholebreastradiationtherapybasedonthequalityassessmentoftreatmentplansintherandomiseddanishbreastcancergroupdbcghypotrial