Cargando…

Pilot Study of Clinician-Patient Collaboration in Glaucoma

PURPOSE: This pilot study was undertaken to examine the feasibility of a larger scale trial examining the effect of interventions to improve patient-clinician collaboration. The primary outcome was the extent of clinician-patient collaboration during glaucoma consultations. The secondary outcomes we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Michael, Bresolin, Marco, McCabe, Rose
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8079360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33935488
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S292347
_version_ 1783685211930755072
author Smith, Michael
Bresolin, Marco
McCabe, Rose
author_facet Smith, Michael
Bresolin, Marco
McCabe, Rose
author_sort Smith, Michael
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This pilot study was undertaken to examine the feasibility of a larger scale trial examining the effect of interventions to improve patient-clinician collaboration. The primary outcome was the extent of clinician-patient collaboration during glaucoma consultations. The secondary outcomes were the results of the Patient Experience Questionnaire and the patients’ opinion of how involved they were in decisions about their care and how keen they would be to increase this involvement. METHODS: This is an observational study of clinician-patient communication involving 9 glaucoma clinicians and 37 patients attending a glaucoma monitoring clinic. Consultations were videotaped and later assessed for the degree of collaboration. Patients completed a validated Patient Experience Questionnaire and a questionnaire designed to collect the patients’ opinion of how involved they were in decisions about their care. RESULTS: The consultations were largely “clinician centred” with clinicians speaking 58% of the sentences and asking a mean of 8.1 questions compared to the patients 2.6. Glaucoma medications were discussed in 97% of consultations. When a treatment change was recommended in 53% of cases different options were discussed. Patients had an overall positive opinion of the consultations. Although 80% of patients indicated they were happy with how involved they were in decisions about their care 44% said they would like to be more involved, and 47% would welcome written information or information sessions on how to be more involved in decisions about their care. CONCLUSION: Glaucoma consultations remain “clinician-centred” and, in view of the evidence of the benefits of good clinician-patient collaboration, further studies to examine interventions to improve clinician-patient collaboration may be of benefit to glaucoma patients. These interventions could target both clinicians and patients, and many patients in this study indicated they would like to be more involved in decisions about their care and would welcome support in achieving this.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8079360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80793602021-04-29 Pilot Study of Clinician-Patient Collaboration in Glaucoma Smith, Michael Bresolin, Marco McCabe, Rose Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: This pilot study was undertaken to examine the feasibility of a larger scale trial examining the effect of interventions to improve patient-clinician collaboration. The primary outcome was the extent of clinician-patient collaboration during glaucoma consultations. The secondary outcomes were the results of the Patient Experience Questionnaire and the patients’ opinion of how involved they were in decisions about their care and how keen they would be to increase this involvement. METHODS: This is an observational study of clinician-patient communication involving 9 glaucoma clinicians and 37 patients attending a glaucoma monitoring clinic. Consultations were videotaped and later assessed for the degree of collaboration. Patients completed a validated Patient Experience Questionnaire and a questionnaire designed to collect the patients’ opinion of how involved they were in decisions about their care. RESULTS: The consultations were largely “clinician centred” with clinicians speaking 58% of the sentences and asking a mean of 8.1 questions compared to the patients 2.6. Glaucoma medications were discussed in 97% of consultations. When a treatment change was recommended in 53% of cases different options were discussed. Patients had an overall positive opinion of the consultations. Although 80% of patients indicated they were happy with how involved they were in decisions about their care 44% said they would like to be more involved, and 47% would welcome written information or information sessions on how to be more involved in decisions about their care. CONCLUSION: Glaucoma consultations remain “clinician-centred” and, in view of the evidence of the benefits of good clinician-patient collaboration, further studies to examine interventions to improve clinician-patient collaboration may be of benefit to glaucoma patients. These interventions could target both clinicians and patients, and many patients in this study indicated they would like to be more involved in decisions about their care and would welcome support in achieving this. Dove 2021-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8079360/ /pubmed/33935488 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S292347 Text en © 2021 Smith et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Smith, Michael
Bresolin, Marco
McCabe, Rose
Pilot Study of Clinician-Patient Collaboration in Glaucoma
title Pilot Study of Clinician-Patient Collaboration in Glaucoma
title_full Pilot Study of Clinician-Patient Collaboration in Glaucoma
title_fullStr Pilot Study of Clinician-Patient Collaboration in Glaucoma
title_full_unstemmed Pilot Study of Clinician-Patient Collaboration in Glaucoma
title_short Pilot Study of Clinician-Patient Collaboration in Glaucoma
title_sort pilot study of clinician-patient collaboration in glaucoma
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8079360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33935488
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S292347
work_keys_str_mv AT smithmichael pilotstudyofclinicianpatientcollaborationinglaucoma
AT bresolinmarco pilotstudyofclinicianpatientcollaborationinglaucoma
AT mccaberose pilotstudyofclinicianpatientcollaborationinglaucoma