Cargando…

Magnetoencephalography Responses to Unpredictable and Predictable Rare Somatosensory Stimuli in Healthy Adult Humans

Mismatch brain responses to unpredicted rare stimuli are suggested to be a neural indicator of prediction error, but this has rarely been studied in the somatosensory modality. Here, we investigated how the brain responds to unpredictable and predictable rare events. Magnetoencephalography responses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Qianru, Ye, Chaoxiong, Hämäläinen, Jarmo A., Ruohonen, Elisa M., Li, Xueqiao, Astikainen, Piia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8079819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33935671
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.641273
_version_ 1783685295444590592
author Xu, Qianru
Ye, Chaoxiong
Hämäläinen, Jarmo A.
Ruohonen, Elisa M.
Li, Xueqiao
Astikainen, Piia
author_facet Xu, Qianru
Ye, Chaoxiong
Hämäläinen, Jarmo A.
Ruohonen, Elisa M.
Li, Xueqiao
Astikainen, Piia
author_sort Xu, Qianru
collection PubMed
description Mismatch brain responses to unpredicted rare stimuli are suggested to be a neural indicator of prediction error, but this has rarely been studied in the somatosensory modality. Here, we investigated how the brain responds to unpredictable and predictable rare events. Magnetoencephalography responses were measured in adults frequently presented with somatosensory stimuli (FRE) that were occasionally replaced by two consecutively presented rare stimuli [unpredictable rare stimulus (UR) and predictable rare stimulus (PR); p = 0.1 for each]. The FRE and PR were electrical stimulations administered to either the little finger or the forefinger in a counterbalanced manner between the two conditions. The UR was a simultaneous electrical stimulation to both the forefinger and the little finger (for a smaller subgroup, the UR and FRE were counterbalanced for the stimulus properties). The grand-averaged responses were characterized by two main components: one at 30–100 ms (M55) and the other at 130–230 ms (M150) latency. Source-level analysis was conducted for the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) and the secondary somatosensory cortex (SII). The M55 responses were larger for the UR and PR than for the FRE in both the SI and the SII areas and were larger for the UR than for the PR. For M150, both investigated areas showed increased activity for the UR and the PR compared to the FRE. Interestingly, although the UR was larger in stimulus energy (stimulation of two fingers at the same time) and had a larger prediction error potential than the PR, the M150 responses to these two rare stimuli did not differ in source strength in either the SI or the SII area. The results suggest that M55, but not M150, can possibly be associated with prediction error signals. These findings highlight the need for disentangling prediction error and rareness-related effects in future studies investigating prediction error signals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8079819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80798192021-04-29 Magnetoencephalography Responses to Unpredictable and Predictable Rare Somatosensory Stimuli in Healthy Adult Humans Xu, Qianru Ye, Chaoxiong Hämäläinen, Jarmo A. Ruohonen, Elisa M. Li, Xueqiao Astikainen, Piia Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Mismatch brain responses to unpredicted rare stimuli are suggested to be a neural indicator of prediction error, but this has rarely been studied in the somatosensory modality. Here, we investigated how the brain responds to unpredictable and predictable rare events. Magnetoencephalography responses were measured in adults frequently presented with somatosensory stimuli (FRE) that were occasionally replaced by two consecutively presented rare stimuli [unpredictable rare stimulus (UR) and predictable rare stimulus (PR); p = 0.1 for each]. The FRE and PR were electrical stimulations administered to either the little finger or the forefinger in a counterbalanced manner between the two conditions. The UR was a simultaneous electrical stimulation to both the forefinger and the little finger (for a smaller subgroup, the UR and FRE were counterbalanced for the stimulus properties). The grand-averaged responses were characterized by two main components: one at 30–100 ms (M55) and the other at 130–230 ms (M150) latency. Source-level analysis was conducted for the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) and the secondary somatosensory cortex (SII). The M55 responses were larger for the UR and PR than for the FRE in both the SI and the SII areas and were larger for the UR than for the PR. For M150, both investigated areas showed increased activity for the UR and the PR compared to the FRE. Interestingly, although the UR was larger in stimulus energy (stimulation of two fingers at the same time) and had a larger prediction error potential than the PR, the M150 responses to these two rare stimuli did not differ in source strength in either the SI or the SII area. The results suggest that M55, but not M150, can possibly be associated with prediction error signals. These findings highlight the need for disentangling prediction error and rareness-related effects in future studies investigating prediction error signals. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8079819/ /pubmed/33935671 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.641273 Text en Copyright © 2021 Xu, Ye, Hämäläinen, Ruohonen, Li and Astikainen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Xu, Qianru
Ye, Chaoxiong
Hämäläinen, Jarmo A.
Ruohonen, Elisa M.
Li, Xueqiao
Astikainen, Piia
Magnetoencephalography Responses to Unpredictable and Predictable Rare Somatosensory Stimuli in Healthy Adult Humans
title Magnetoencephalography Responses to Unpredictable and Predictable Rare Somatosensory Stimuli in Healthy Adult Humans
title_full Magnetoencephalography Responses to Unpredictable and Predictable Rare Somatosensory Stimuli in Healthy Adult Humans
title_fullStr Magnetoencephalography Responses to Unpredictable and Predictable Rare Somatosensory Stimuli in Healthy Adult Humans
title_full_unstemmed Magnetoencephalography Responses to Unpredictable and Predictable Rare Somatosensory Stimuli in Healthy Adult Humans
title_short Magnetoencephalography Responses to Unpredictable and Predictable Rare Somatosensory Stimuli in Healthy Adult Humans
title_sort magnetoencephalography responses to unpredictable and predictable rare somatosensory stimuli in healthy adult humans
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8079819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33935671
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.641273
work_keys_str_mv AT xuqianru magnetoencephalographyresponsestounpredictableandpredictableraresomatosensorystimuliinhealthyadulthumans
AT yechaoxiong magnetoencephalographyresponsestounpredictableandpredictableraresomatosensorystimuliinhealthyadulthumans
AT hamalainenjarmoa magnetoencephalographyresponsestounpredictableandpredictableraresomatosensorystimuliinhealthyadulthumans
AT ruohonenelisam magnetoencephalographyresponsestounpredictableandpredictableraresomatosensorystimuliinhealthyadulthumans
AT lixueqiao magnetoencephalographyresponsestounpredictableandpredictableraresomatosensorystimuliinhealthyadulthumans
AT astikainenpiia magnetoencephalographyresponsestounpredictableandpredictableraresomatosensorystimuliinhealthyadulthumans