Cargando…
Automated fiducial marker detection and localization in volumetric computed tomography images: a three-step hybrid approach with deep learning
Purpose: Automating fiducial detection and localization in the patient’s pre-operative images can lead to better registration accuracy, reduced human errors, and shorter intervention time. Most current approaches are optimized for a single marker type, mainly spherical adhesive markers. A fully auto...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8080060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33937439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.8.2.025002 |
_version_ | 1783685350242123776 |
---|---|
author | Regodić, Milovan Bardosi, Zoltan Freysinger, Wolfgang |
author_facet | Regodić, Milovan Bardosi, Zoltan Freysinger, Wolfgang |
author_sort | Regodić, Milovan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: Automating fiducial detection and localization in the patient’s pre-operative images can lead to better registration accuracy, reduced human errors, and shorter intervention time. Most current approaches are optimized for a single marker type, mainly spherical adhesive markers. A fully automated algorithm is proposed and evaluated for screw and spherical titanium fiducials, typically used in high-accurate frameless surgical navigation. Approach: The algorithm builds on previous approaches with morphological functions and pose estimation algorithms. A 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) is proposed for the fiducial classification task and evaluated for both traditional closed-set and emerging open-set classifiers. A proposed digital ground-truth experiment, with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging software, is performed to determine the localization accuracy of the algorithm. The localized fiducial positions in the CBCT images by the presented algorithm were compared to the actual known positions in the virtual phantom models. The difference represents the fiducial localization error (FLE). Results: A total of 241 screws, 151 spherical fiducials, and 1550 other structures are identified with the best true positive rate 95.9% for screw and 99.3% for spherical fiducials at 8.7% and 3.4% false positive rate, respectively. The best achieved FLE mean and its standard deviation for a screw and spherical marker are 58 (14) and [Formula: see text] , respectively. Conclusions: Accurate marker detection and localization were achieved, with spherical fiducials being superior to screws. Large marker volume and smaller voxel size yield significantly smaller FLEs. Attenuating noise by mesh smoothing has a minor effect on FLE. Future work will focus on expanding the CNN for image segmentation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8080060 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80800602022-04-28 Automated fiducial marker detection and localization in volumetric computed tomography images: a three-step hybrid approach with deep learning Regodić, Milovan Bardosi, Zoltan Freysinger, Wolfgang J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling Purpose: Automating fiducial detection and localization in the patient’s pre-operative images can lead to better registration accuracy, reduced human errors, and shorter intervention time. Most current approaches are optimized for a single marker type, mainly spherical adhesive markers. A fully automated algorithm is proposed and evaluated for screw and spherical titanium fiducials, typically used in high-accurate frameless surgical navigation. Approach: The algorithm builds on previous approaches with morphological functions and pose estimation algorithms. A 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) is proposed for the fiducial classification task and evaluated for both traditional closed-set and emerging open-set classifiers. A proposed digital ground-truth experiment, with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging software, is performed to determine the localization accuracy of the algorithm. The localized fiducial positions in the CBCT images by the presented algorithm were compared to the actual known positions in the virtual phantom models. The difference represents the fiducial localization error (FLE). Results: A total of 241 screws, 151 spherical fiducials, and 1550 other structures are identified with the best true positive rate 95.9% for screw and 99.3% for spherical fiducials at 8.7% and 3.4% false positive rate, respectively. The best achieved FLE mean and its standard deviation for a screw and spherical marker are 58 (14) and [Formula: see text] , respectively. Conclusions: Accurate marker detection and localization were achieved, with spherical fiducials being superior to screws. Large marker volume and smaller voxel size yield significantly smaller FLEs. Attenuating noise by mesh smoothing has a minor effect on FLE. Future work will focus on expanding the CNN for image segmentation. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2021-04-28 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8080060/ /pubmed/33937439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.8.2.025002 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI. |
spellingShingle | Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling Regodić, Milovan Bardosi, Zoltan Freysinger, Wolfgang Automated fiducial marker detection and localization in volumetric computed tomography images: a three-step hybrid approach with deep learning |
title | Automated fiducial marker detection and localization in volumetric computed tomography images: a three-step hybrid approach with deep learning |
title_full | Automated fiducial marker detection and localization in volumetric computed tomography images: a three-step hybrid approach with deep learning |
title_fullStr | Automated fiducial marker detection and localization in volumetric computed tomography images: a three-step hybrid approach with deep learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Automated fiducial marker detection and localization in volumetric computed tomography images: a three-step hybrid approach with deep learning |
title_short | Automated fiducial marker detection and localization in volumetric computed tomography images: a three-step hybrid approach with deep learning |
title_sort | automated fiducial marker detection and localization in volumetric computed tomography images: a three-step hybrid approach with deep learning |
topic | Image-Guided Procedures, Robotic Interventions, and Modeling |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8080060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33937439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.8.2.025002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT regodicmilovan automatedfiducialmarkerdetectionandlocalizationinvolumetriccomputedtomographyimagesathreestephybridapproachwithdeeplearning AT bardosizoltan automatedfiducialmarkerdetectionandlocalizationinvolumetriccomputedtomographyimagesathreestephybridapproachwithdeeplearning AT freysingerwolfgang automatedfiducialmarkerdetectionandlocalizationinvolumetriccomputedtomographyimagesathreestephybridapproachwithdeeplearning |