Cargando…
Performance evaluation of pipelines for mapping, variant calling and interval padding, for the analysis of NGS germline panels
BACKGROUND: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) represents a significant advancement in clinical genetics. However, its use creates several technical, data interpretation and management challenges. It is essential to follow a consistent data analysis pipeline to achieve the highest possible accuracy an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8080428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33910496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-021-04144-1 |
_version_ | 1783685423868936192 |
---|---|
author | Zanti, Maria Michailidou, Kyriaki Loizidou, Maria A. Machattou, Christina Pirpa, Panagiota Christodoulou, Kyproula Spyrou, George M. Kyriacou, Kyriacos Hadjisavvas, Andreas |
author_facet | Zanti, Maria Michailidou, Kyriaki Loizidou, Maria A. Machattou, Christina Pirpa, Panagiota Christodoulou, Kyproula Spyrou, George M. Kyriacou, Kyriacos Hadjisavvas, Andreas |
author_sort | Zanti, Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) represents a significant advancement in clinical genetics. However, its use creates several technical, data interpretation and management challenges. It is essential to follow a consistent data analysis pipeline to achieve the highest possible accuracy and avoid false variant calls. Herein, we aimed to compare the performance of twenty-eight combinations of NGS data analysis pipeline compartments, including short-read mapping (BWA-MEM, Bowtie2, Stampy), variant calling (GATK-HaplotypeCaller, GATK-UnifiedGenotyper, SAMtools) and interval padding (null, 50 bp, 100 bp) methods, along with a commercially available pipeline (BWA Enrichment, Illumina®). Fourteen germline DNA samples from breast cancer patients were sequenced using a targeted NGS panel approach and subjected to data analysis. RESULTS: We highlight that interval padding is required for the accurate detection of intronic variants including spliceogenic pathogenic variants (PVs). In addition, using nearly default parameters, the BWA Enrichment algorithm, failed to detect these spliceogenic PVs and a missense PV in the TP53 gene. We also recommend the BWA-MEM algorithm for sequence alignment, whereas variant calling should be performed using a combination of variant calling algorithms; GATK-HaplotypeCaller and SAMtools for the accurate detection of insertions/deletions and GATK-UnifiedGenotyper for the efficient detection of single nucleotide variant calls. CONCLUSIONS: These findings have important implications towards the identification of clinically actionable variants through panel testing in a clinical laboratory setting, when dedicated bioinformatics personnel might not always be available. The results also reveal the necessity of improving the existing tools and/or at the same time developing new pipelines to generate more reliable and more consistent data. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12859-021-04144-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8080428 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80804282021-04-29 Performance evaluation of pipelines for mapping, variant calling and interval padding, for the analysis of NGS germline panels Zanti, Maria Michailidou, Kyriaki Loizidou, Maria A. Machattou, Christina Pirpa, Panagiota Christodoulou, Kyproula Spyrou, George M. Kyriacou, Kyriacos Hadjisavvas, Andreas BMC Bioinformatics Research BACKGROUND: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) represents a significant advancement in clinical genetics. However, its use creates several technical, data interpretation and management challenges. It is essential to follow a consistent data analysis pipeline to achieve the highest possible accuracy and avoid false variant calls. Herein, we aimed to compare the performance of twenty-eight combinations of NGS data analysis pipeline compartments, including short-read mapping (BWA-MEM, Bowtie2, Stampy), variant calling (GATK-HaplotypeCaller, GATK-UnifiedGenotyper, SAMtools) and interval padding (null, 50 bp, 100 bp) methods, along with a commercially available pipeline (BWA Enrichment, Illumina®). Fourteen germline DNA samples from breast cancer patients were sequenced using a targeted NGS panel approach and subjected to data analysis. RESULTS: We highlight that interval padding is required for the accurate detection of intronic variants including spliceogenic pathogenic variants (PVs). In addition, using nearly default parameters, the BWA Enrichment algorithm, failed to detect these spliceogenic PVs and a missense PV in the TP53 gene. We also recommend the BWA-MEM algorithm for sequence alignment, whereas variant calling should be performed using a combination of variant calling algorithms; GATK-HaplotypeCaller and SAMtools for the accurate detection of insertions/deletions and GATK-UnifiedGenotyper for the efficient detection of single nucleotide variant calls. CONCLUSIONS: These findings have important implications towards the identification of clinically actionable variants through panel testing in a clinical laboratory setting, when dedicated bioinformatics personnel might not always be available. The results also reveal the necessity of improving the existing tools and/or at the same time developing new pipelines to generate more reliable and more consistent data. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12859-021-04144-1. BioMed Central 2021-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8080428/ /pubmed/33910496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-021-04144-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Zanti, Maria Michailidou, Kyriaki Loizidou, Maria A. Machattou, Christina Pirpa, Panagiota Christodoulou, Kyproula Spyrou, George M. Kyriacou, Kyriacos Hadjisavvas, Andreas Performance evaluation of pipelines for mapping, variant calling and interval padding, for the analysis of NGS germline panels |
title | Performance evaluation of pipelines for mapping, variant calling and interval padding, for the analysis of NGS germline panels |
title_full | Performance evaluation of pipelines for mapping, variant calling and interval padding, for the analysis of NGS germline panels |
title_fullStr | Performance evaluation of pipelines for mapping, variant calling and interval padding, for the analysis of NGS germline panels |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance evaluation of pipelines for mapping, variant calling and interval padding, for the analysis of NGS germline panels |
title_short | Performance evaluation of pipelines for mapping, variant calling and interval padding, for the analysis of NGS germline panels |
title_sort | performance evaluation of pipelines for mapping, variant calling and interval padding, for the analysis of ngs germline panels |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8080428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33910496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-021-04144-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zantimaria performanceevaluationofpipelinesformappingvariantcallingandintervalpaddingfortheanalysisofngsgermlinepanels AT michailidoukyriaki performanceevaluationofpipelinesformappingvariantcallingandintervalpaddingfortheanalysisofngsgermlinepanels AT loizidoumariaa performanceevaluationofpipelinesformappingvariantcallingandintervalpaddingfortheanalysisofngsgermlinepanels AT machattouchristina performanceevaluationofpipelinesformappingvariantcallingandintervalpaddingfortheanalysisofngsgermlinepanels AT pirpapanagiota performanceevaluationofpipelinesformappingvariantcallingandintervalpaddingfortheanalysisofngsgermlinepanels AT christodouloukyproula performanceevaluationofpipelinesformappingvariantcallingandintervalpaddingfortheanalysisofngsgermlinepanels AT spyrougeorgem performanceevaluationofpipelinesformappingvariantcallingandintervalpaddingfortheanalysisofngsgermlinepanels AT kyriacoukyriacos performanceevaluationofpipelinesformappingvariantcallingandintervalpaddingfortheanalysisofngsgermlinepanels AT hadjisavvasandreas performanceevaluationofpipelinesformappingvariantcallingandintervalpaddingfortheanalysisofngsgermlinepanels |