Cargando…
Current trends in gene recovery mediated by the CRISPR-Cas system
The CRISPR-Cas system has undoubtedly revolutionized the genome editing field, enabling targeted gene disruption, regulation, and recovery in a guide RNA-specific manner. In this review, we focus on currently available gene recovery strategies that use CRISPR nucleases, particularly for the treatmen...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8080666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32651459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s12276-020-0466-1 |
_version_ | 1783685481414787072 |
---|---|
author | Jang, Hyeon-Ki Song, Beomjong Hwang, Gue-Ho Bae, Sangsu |
author_facet | Jang, Hyeon-Ki Song, Beomjong Hwang, Gue-Ho Bae, Sangsu |
author_sort | Jang, Hyeon-Ki |
collection | PubMed |
description | The CRISPR-Cas system has undoubtedly revolutionized the genome editing field, enabling targeted gene disruption, regulation, and recovery in a guide RNA-specific manner. In this review, we focus on currently available gene recovery strategies that use CRISPR nucleases, particularly for the treatment of genetic disorders. Through the action of DNA repair mechanisms, CRISPR-mediated DNA cleavage at a genomic target can shift the reading frame to correct abnormal frameshifts, whereas DNA cleavage at two sites, which can induce large deletions or inversions, can correct structural abnormalities in DNA. Homology-mediated or homology-independent gene recovery strategies that require donor DNAs have been developed and widely applied to precisely correct mutated sequences in genes of interest. In contrast to the DNA cleavage-mediated gene correction methods listed above, base-editing tools enable base conversion in the absence of donor DNAs. In addition, CRISPR-associated transposases have been harnessed to generate a targeted knockin, and prime editors have been developed to edit tens of nucleotides in cells. Here, we introduce currently developed gene recovery strategies and discuss the pros and cons of each. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8080666 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80806662021-04-29 Current trends in gene recovery mediated by the CRISPR-Cas system Jang, Hyeon-Ki Song, Beomjong Hwang, Gue-Ho Bae, Sangsu Exp Mol Med Review Article The CRISPR-Cas system has undoubtedly revolutionized the genome editing field, enabling targeted gene disruption, regulation, and recovery in a guide RNA-specific manner. In this review, we focus on currently available gene recovery strategies that use CRISPR nucleases, particularly for the treatment of genetic disorders. Through the action of DNA repair mechanisms, CRISPR-mediated DNA cleavage at a genomic target can shift the reading frame to correct abnormal frameshifts, whereas DNA cleavage at two sites, which can induce large deletions or inversions, can correct structural abnormalities in DNA. Homology-mediated or homology-independent gene recovery strategies that require donor DNAs have been developed and widely applied to precisely correct mutated sequences in genes of interest. In contrast to the DNA cleavage-mediated gene correction methods listed above, base-editing tools enable base conversion in the absence of donor DNAs. In addition, CRISPR-associated transposases have been harnessed to generate a targeted knockin, and prime editors have been developed to edit tens of nucleotides in cells. Here, we introduce currently developed gene recovery strategies and discuss the pros and cons of each. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8080666/ /pubmed/32651459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s12276-020-0466-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Jang, Hyeon-Ki Song, Beomjong Hwang, Gue-Ho Bae, Sangsu Current trends in gene recovery mediated by the CRISPR-Cas system |
title | Current trends in gene recovery mediated by the CRISPR-Cas system |
title_full | Current trends in gene recovery mediated by the CRISPR-Cas system |
title_fullStr | Current trends in gene recovery mediated by the CRISPR-Cas system |
title_full_unstemmed | Current trends in gene recovery mediated by the CRISPR-Cas system |
title_short | Current trends in gene recovery mediated by the CRISPR-Cas system |
title_sort | current trends in gene recovery mediated by the crispr-cas system |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8080666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32651459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s12276-020-0466-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT janghyeonki currenttrendsingenerecoverymediatedbythecrisprcassystem AT songbeomjong currenttrendsingenerecoverymediatedbythecrisprcassystem AT hwanggueho currenttrendsingenerecoverymediatedbythecrisprcassystem AT baesangsu currenttrendsingenerecoverymediatedbythecrisprcassystem |