Cargando…

Practical prediction model of the clinical response to programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors in advanced gastric cancer

The identification of predictive biomarkers or models is necessary for the selection of patients who might benefit the most from immunotherapy. Seven histological features (signet ring cell [SRC], fibrous stroma, myxoid stroma, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes [TILs], necrosis, tertiary lymphoid folli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noh, Myung-Giun, Yoon, Youngmin, Kim, Gihyeon, Kim, Hyun, Lee, Eulgi, Kim, Yeongmin, Park, Changho, Lee, Kyung-Hwa, Park, Hansoo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8080676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33547412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s12276-021-00559-1
_version_ 1783685484698927104
author Noh, Myung-Giun
Yoon, Youngmin
Kim, Gihyeon
Kim, Hyun
Lee, Eulgi
Kim, Yeongmin
Park, Changho
Lee, Kyung-Hwa
Park, Hansoo
author_facet Noh, Myung-Giun
Yoon, Youngmin
Kim, Gihyeon
Kim, Hyun
Lee, Eulgi
Kim, Yeongmin
Park, Changho
Lee, Kyung-Hwa
Park, Hansoo
author_sort Noh, Myung-Giun
collection PubMed
description The identification of predictive biomarkers or models is necessary for the selection of patients who might benefit the most from immunotherapy. Seven histological features (signet ring cell [SRC], fibrous stroma, myxoid stroma, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes [TILs], necrosis, tertiary lymphoid follicles, and ulceration) detected in surgically resected tissues (N = 44) were used to train a model. The presence of SRC became an optimal decision parameter for pathology alone (AUC = 0.78). Analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for the prediction of genomic markers showed that C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 11 (CXCL11) was high in responders (P < 0.001). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed to verify its potential as a biomarker. IHC revealed that the expression of CXCL11 was associated with responsiveness (P = 0.003). The response prediction model was trained by integrating the results of the analysis of pathological factors and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). When trained with the C5.0 decision tree model, the categorical level of the expression of CXCL11, a single variable, was shown to be the best model (AUC = 0.812). The AUC of the model trained with the random forest was 0.944. Survival analysis revealed that the C5.0-trained model (log-rank P = 0.01 for progression-free survival [PFS]; log-rank P = 0.012 for overall survival [OS]) and the random forest-trained model (log-rank P < 0.001 for PFS; log-rank P = 0.001 for OS) predicted prognosis more accurately than the PD-L1 test (log-rank P = 0.031 for PFS; log-rank P = 0.107 for OS).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8080676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80806762021-04-29 Practical prediction model of the clinical response to programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors in advanced gastric cancer Noh, Myung-Giun Yoon, Youngmin Kim, Gihyeon Kim, Hyun Lee, Eulgi Kim, Yeongmin Park, Changho Lee, Kyung-Hwa Park, Hansoo Exp Mol Med Article The identification of predictive biomarkers or models is necessary for the selection of patients who might benefit the most from immunotherapy. Seven histological features (signet ring cell [SRC], fibrous stroma, myxoid stroma, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes [TILs], necrosis, tertiary lymphoid follicles, and ulceration) detected in surgically resected tissues (N = 44) were used to train a model. The presence of SRC became an optimal decision parameter for pathology alone (AUC = 0.78). Analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for the prediction of genomic markers showed that C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 11 (CXCL11) was high in responders (P < 0.001). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed to verify its potential as a biomarker. IHC revealed that the expression of CXCL11 was associated with responsiveness (P = 0.003). The response prediction model was trained by integrating the results of the analysis of pathological factors and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). When trained with the C5.0 decision tree model, the categorical level of the expression of CXCL11, a single variable, was shown to be the best model (AUC = 0.812). The AUC of the model trained with the random forest was 0.944. Survival analysis revealed that the C5.0-trained model (log-rank P = 0.01 for progression-free survival [PFS]; log-rank P = 0.012 for overall survival [OS]) and the random forest-trained model (log-rank P < 0.001 for PFS; log-rank P = 0.001 for OS) predicted prognosis more accurately than the PD-L1 test (log-rank P = 0.031 for PFS; log-rank P = 0.107 for OS). Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8080676/ /pubmed/33547412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s12276-021-00559-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Noh, Myung-Giun
Yoon, Youngmin
Kim, Gihyeon
Kim, Hyun
Lee, Eulgi
Kim, Yeongmin
Park, Changho
Lee, Kyung-Hwa
Park, Hansoo
Practical prediction model of the clinical response to programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors in advanced gastric cancer
title Practical prediction model of the clinical response to programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors in advanced gastric cancer
title_full Practical prediction model of the clinical response to programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors in advanced gastric cancer
title_fullStr Practical prediction model of the clinical response to programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors in advanced gastric cancer
title_full_unstemmed Practical prediction model of the clinical response to programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors in advanced gastric cancer
title_short Practical prediction model of the clinical response to programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors in advanced gastric cancer
title_sort practical prediction model of the clinical response to programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors in advanced gastric cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8080676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33547412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s12276-021-00559-1
work_keys_str_mv AT nohmyunggiun practicalpredictionmodeloftheclinicalresponsetoprogrammeddeathligand1inhibitorsinadvancedgastriccancer
AT yoonyoungmin practicalpredictionmodeloftheclinicalresponsetoprogrammeddeathligand1inhibitorsinadvancedgastriccancer
AT kimgihyeon practicalpredictionmodeloftheclinicalresponsetoprogrammeddeathligand1inhibitorsinadvancedgastriccancer
AT kimhyun practicalpredictionmodeloftheclinicalresponsetoprogrammeddeathligand1inhibitorsinadvancedgastriccancer
AT leeeulgi practicalpredictionmodeloftheclinicalresponsetoprogrammeddeathligand1inhibitorsinadvancedgastriccancer
AT kimyeongmin practicalpredictionmodeloftheclinicalresponsetoprogrammeddeathligand1inhibitorsinadvancedgastriccancer
AT parkchangho practicalpredictionmodeloftheclinicalresponsetoprogrammeddeathligand1inhibitorsinadvancedgastriccancer
AT leekyunghwa practicalpredictionmodeloftheclinicalresponsetoprogrammeddeathligand1inhibitorsinadvancedgastriccancer
AT parkhansoo practicalpredictionmodeloftheclinicalresponsetoprogrammeddeathligand1inhibitorsinadvancedgastriccancer