Cargando…

Evaluation of the Accuracy of Current Tubeless Pumps for Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion

Background: Recently two new tubeless pumps for insulin therapy were introduced. They were tested for accuracy and occlusion detection and compared with the established patch pump Omnipod(®) (OP). Methods: Using a modified setup for tubeless pumps based on IEC 60601-2-24, the basal rate and bolus de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ziegler, Ralph, Oliver, Nick, Waldenmaier, Delia, Mende, Jochen, Haug, Cornelia, Freckmann, Guido
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8080918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33210949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2020.0525
_version_ 1783685535790792704
author Ziegler, Ralph
Oliver, Nick
Waldenmaier, Delia
Mende, Jochen
Haug, Cornelia
Freckmann, Guido
author_facet Ziegler, Ralph
Oliver, Nick
Waldenmaier, Delia
Mende, Jochen
Haug, Cornelia
Freckmann, Guido
author_sort Ziegler, Ralph
collection PubMed
description Background: Recently two new tubeless pumps for insulin therapy were introduced. They were tested for accuracy and occlusion detection and compared with the established patch pump Omnipod(®) (OP). Methods: Using a modified setup for tubeless pumps based on IEC 60601-2-24, the basal rate and bolus delivery of the Accu-Chek(®) Solo micropump system (ACS) and the A6 TouchCare(®) System (A6) were measured with a microgravimetric method. Bolus sizes of 0.2, 1, and 10 U, and basal rates of 0.1 and 1 U/h were evaluated in nine repetitions. For each parameter, mean deviation and number of individual boluses or 1-h basal rate windows within ±15% from target were calculated. In addition, occlusion detection time at basal rates of 0.1 and 1 U/h was determined. Results: Mean deviation of boluses of different volumes in the pumps ranged from −3.3% to +4.0% and 40%–100% of individual boluses were within ±15% of the target. During basal rate delivery, 48% to 98% of 1-h windows were within ±15% of the target with a mean deviation between -5.3% and +6.5%. In general, considerable differences between pump models were observed and deviations decreased with increasing doses. In most parameters, ACS was more accurate, and A6 less accurate, than OP. Mean occlusion detection time ranged from ∼3 to 7.5 h at 1 U/h and was >24 h or absent at 0.1 U/h. Conclusions: In this evaluation, significant differences between the tested tubeless pump models were observed that became most evident when regarding delivery errors over short time and small volumes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8080918
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80809182021-04-29 Evaluation of the Accuracy of Current Tubeless Pumps for Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Ziegler, Ralph Oliver, Nick Waldenmaier, Delia Mende, Jochen Haug, Cornelia Freckmann, Guido Diabetes Technol Ther Original Articles Background: Recently two new tubeless pumps for insulin therapy were introduced. They were tested for accuracy and occlusion detection and compared with the established patch pump Omnipod(®) (OP). Methods: Using a modified setup for tubeless pumps based on IEC 60601-2-24, the basal rate and bolus delivery of the Accu-Chek(®) Solo micropump system (ACS) and the A6 TouchCare(®) System (A6) were measured with a microgravimetric method. Bolus sizes of 0.2, 1, and 10 U, and basal rates of 0.1 and 1 U/h were evaluated in nine repetitions. For each parameter, mean deviation and number of individual boluses or 1-h basal rate windows within ±15% from target were calculated. In addition, occlusion detection time at basal rates of 0.1 and 1 U/h was determined. Results: Mean deviation of boluses of different volumes in the pumps ranged from −3.3% to +4.0% and 40%–100% of individual boluses were within ±15% of the target. During basal rate delivery, 48% to 98% of 1-h windows were within ±15% of the target with a mean deviation between -5.3% and +6.5%. In general, considerable differences between pump models were observed and deviations decreased with increasing doses. In most parameters, ACS was more accurate, and A6 less accurate, than OP. Mean occlusion detection time ranged from ∼3 to 7.5 h at 1 U/h and was >24 h or absent at 0.1 U/h. Conclusions: In this evaluation, significant differences between the tested tubeless pump models were observed that became most evident when regarding delivery errors over short time and small volumes. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2021-05-01 2021-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8080918/ /pubmed/33210949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2020.0525 Text en © Ralph Ziegler, et al., 2021; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ziegler, Ralph
Oliver, Nick
Waldenmaier, Delia
Mende, Jochen
Haug, Cornelia
Freckmann, Guido
Evaluation of the Accuracy of Current Tubeless Pumps for Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion
title Evaluation of the Accuracy of Current Tubeless Pumps for Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion
title_full Evaluation of the Accuracy of Current Tubeless Pumps for Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Accuracy of Current Tubeless Pumps for Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Accuracy of Current Tubeless Pumps for Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion
title_short Evaluation of the Accuracy of Current Tubeless Pumps for Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion
title_sort evaluation of the accuracy of current tubeless pumps for continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8080918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33210949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2020.0525
work_keys_str_mv AT zieglerralph evaluationoftheaccuracyofcurrenttubelesspumpsforcontinuoussubcutaneousinsulininfusion
AT olivernick evaluationoftheaccuracyofcurrenttubelesspumpsforcontinuoussubcutaneousinsulininfusion
AT waldenmaierdelia evaluationoftheaccuracyofcurrenttubelesspumpsforcontinuoussubcutaneousinsulininfusion
AT mendejochen evaluationoftheaccuracyofcurrenttubelesspumpsforcontinuoussubcutaneousinsulininfusion
AT haugcornelia evaluationoftheaccuracyofcurrenttubelesspumpsforcontinuoussubcutaneousinsulininfusion
AT freckmannguido evaluationoftheaccuracyofcurrenttubelesspumpsforcontinuoussubcutaneousinsulininfusion