Cargando…

SWAT 76 evaluation: randomised evaluation of sending pre-notification cards to trial participants before a face-to-face primary outcome measurement to increase attendance

Background: Retention is considered the second highest trial methods priority in the UK after recruitment.   Methods: This Study Within A Trial (SWAT) evaluated whether sending a pre-notification card around one month before a face-to-face primary outcome measurement visit compared to not sending th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Treweek, Shaun, Gallant, Stephanie, Anderson, Annie S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8080942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33968362
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.50890.2
_version_ 1783685540658282496
author Treweek, Shaun
Gallant, Stephanie
Anderson, Annie S.
author_facet Treweek, Shaun
Gallant, Stephanie
Anderson, Annie S.
author_sort Treweek, Shaun
collection PubMed
description Background: Retention is considered the second highest trial methods priority in the UK after recruitment.   Methods: This Study Within A Trial (SWAT) evaluated whether sending a pre-notification card around one month before a face-to-face primary outcome measurement visit compared to not sending the card increased trial retention. The SWAT was a two-arm, parallel randomised (1:1 allocation ratio), stratified by centre, study. It was embedded within the ActWELL host trial, which evaluated whether women receiving lifestyle change counselling from volunteer coaches improved outcomes including weight and physical activity. The SWAT primary outcome was the difference in the proportion of participants attending the host trial primary outcome measurement visit. The secondary outcome was the direct cost of sending cards. Host trial participants and research staff at the primary outcome visit were blind to the SWAT. Analysis was intention-to-treat. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Results: 558 host trial participants took part in the SWAT and were included in the analysis. Of the 274 women sent a card, 231 attended the primary outcome visit (84.3%) compared to 230/284 (81.0%) for those not receiving a card. Sending a pre-notification card may result in a slight increase in attendance at a face-to-face primary outcome measurement visit at 1-year: risk difference = 3.3% (95% confidence interval = -3.0% to 9.6%). This is GRADE low certainty evidence. A recording error meant it was unclear whether 17 participants allocated to the card were actually sent one but a sensitivity analysis did not change the overall result or conclusion. The direct cost of producing and sending the cards was £192 GBP (€213 EUR; $260 USD), or £21.33 (€23.55; $28.77 per additional retained participant.   Discussion: Trialists could consider using pre-notification as they may gain a slight increase in retention to face-to-face trial measurement visits but further evaluations are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8080942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80809422021-05-06 SWAT 76 evaluation: randomised evaluation of sending pre-notification cards to trial participants before a face-to-face primary outcome measurement to increase attendance Treweek, Shaun Gallant, Stephanie Anderson, Annie S. F1000Res Brief Report Background: Retention is considered the second highest trial methods priority in the UK after recruitment.   Methods: This Study Within A Trial (SWAT) evaluated whether sending a pre-notification card around one month before a face-to-face primary outcome measurement visit compared to not sending the card increased trial retention. The SWAT was a two-arm, parallel randomised (1:1 allocation ratio), stratified by centre, study. It was embedded within the ActWELL host trial, which evaluated whether women receiving lifestyle change counselling from volunteer coaches improved outcomes including weight and physical activity. The SWAT primary outcome was the difference in the proportion of participants attending the host trial primary outcome measurement visit. The secondary outcome was the direct cost of sending cards. Host trial participants and research staff at the primary outcome visit were blind to the SWAT. Analysis was intention-to-treat. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Results: 558 host trial participants took part in the SWAT and were included in the analysis. Of the 274 women sent a card, 231 attended the primary outcome visit (84.3%) compared to 230/284 (81.0%) for those not receiving a card. Sending a pre-notification card may result in a slight increase in attendance at a face-to-face primary outcome measurement visit at 1-year: risk difference = 3.3% (95% confidence interval = -3.0% to 9.6%). This is GRADE low certainty evidence. A recording error meant it was unclear whether 17 participants allocated to the card were actually sent one but a sensitivity analysis did not change the overall result or conclusion. The direct cost of producing and sending the cards was £192 GBP (€213 EUR; $260 USD), or £21.33 (€23.55; $28.77 per additional retained participant.   Discussion: Trialists could consider using pre-notification as they may gain a slight increase in retention to face-to-face trial measurement visits but further evaluations are needed. F1000 Research Limited 2021-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8080942/ /pubmed/33968362 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.50890.2 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Treweek S et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Treweek, Shaun
Gallant, Stephanie
Anderson, Annie S.
SWAT 76 evaluation: randomised evaluation of sending pre-notification cards to trial participants before a face-to-face primary outcome measurement to increase attendance
title SWAT 76 evaluation: randomised evaluation of sending pre-notification cards to trial participants before a face-to-face primary outcome measurement to increase attendance
title_full SWAT 76 evaluation: randomised evaluation of sending pre-notification cards to trial participants before a face-to-face primary outcome measurement to increase attendance
title_fullStr SWAT 76 evaluation: randomised evaluation of sending pre-notification cards to trial participants before a face-to-face primary outcome measurement to increase attendance
title_full_unstemmed SWAT 76 evaluation: randomised evaluation of sending pre-notification cards to trial participants before a face-to-face primary outcome measurement to increase attendance
title_short SWAT 76 evaluation: randomised evaluation of sending pre-notification cards to trial participants before a face-to-face primary outcome measurement to increase attendance
title_sort swat 76 evaluation: randomised evaluation of sending pre-notification cards to trial participants before a face-to-face primary outcome measurement to increase attendance
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8080942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33968362
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.50890.2
work_keys_str_mv AT treweekshaun swat76evaluationrandomisedevaluationofsendingprenotificationcardstotrialparticipantsbeforeafacetofaceprimaryoutcomemeasurementtoincreaseattendance
AT gallantstephanie swat76evaluationrandomisedevaluationofsendingprenotificationcardstotrialparticipantsbeforeafacetofaceprimaryoutcomemeasurementtoincreaseattendance
AT andersonannies swat76evaluationrandomisedevaluationofsendingprenotificationcardstotrialparticipantsbeforeafacetofaceprimaryoutcomemeasurementtoincreaseattendance