Cargando…

Incidence, Management and Outcomes in Women Undergoing Peripartum Hysterectomy in a Tertiary Care Centre in India

Background Peripartum hysterectomy (PRH) is the surgical removal of the uterus performed in obstetrical complications such as uncontrolled postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), unrepairable uterine rupture, and sepsis. Its incidence has increased in recent years. The objective of this study was to review al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaudhary, Vidhi, Singh, Meenakshi, Nain, Shilpi, Reena, FNU, Aggarwal, Kiran, Biswas, Ratna, Puri, Manju, Pujari, Janithya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8080949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33936882
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14171
_version_ 1783685542410452992
author Chaudhary, Vidhi
Singh, Meenakshi
Nain, Shilpi
Reena, FNU
Aggarwal, Kiran
Biswas, Ratna
Puri, Manju
Pujari, Janithya
author_facet Chaudhary, Vidhi
Singh, Meenakshi
Nain, Shilpi
Reena, FNU
Aggarwal, Kiran
Biswas, Ratna
Puri, Manju
Pujari, Janithya
author_sort Chaudhary, Vidhi
collection PubMed
description Background Peripartum hysterectomy (PRH) is the surgical removal of the uterus performed in obstetrical complications such as uncontrolled postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), unrepairable uterine rupture, and sepsis. Its incidence has increased in recent years. The objective of this study was to review all the cases of PRH in a tertiary care teaching hospital over three years (January 2017-December 2019) to determine its incidence and analyse clinico-demographic characteristics in these women. Method All women undergoing PRH from January 2017 to December 2019 were included in the study. Data were collected retrospectively from medical records, of patients who underwent a PRH at the time of delivery, or within 24 hours, or performed any time before discharge from the same hospitalization and obstetric event. The total number of deliveries including caesarean and vaginal deliveries were recorded. Main outcome measures were the incidence of PRH, indication for hysterectomy, management option used, maternal outcomes (PPH, bladder injury and maternal death) and fetal outcomes (stillbirth). Results There were a total of 3904,4 deliveries; 27,337 vaginal and 11,697 caesarean sections in three years. A total of 50 patients underwent a PRH. The incidence of PRH in our study was 1.3 per 1,000 deliveries and 3.5/1,000 caesareans, respectively. PRH was found to be more common following cesarean sections than vaginal deliveries (odds ratio 22.86 [95% CI: 8.16 to 63.98]). Morbid adherent placenta (MAP) (n=30, 62%) was the most common indications of PRH. Seven (15%) women had PRH due to uterine rupture. Twenty-seven women of the 30 women (90%) with the MAP had a previous caesarean delivery. The case fatality rate per hysterectomy was 4%. Stillbirth rate (SBR: n=8,16%) among women having PRH was seven-fold higher than overall SBR in our country. Conclusion There has been a rise in MAP as an indication of PRH in our study for a decade in comparison to uterine atony. Caesarean delivery is a significant risk factor for PRH. Previous caesarean section and major placenta previa were common occurring obstetric risk factors present in the MAP in our cohort. Our maternal mortality in PRH was low and the stillbirth rate was high when compared with national data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8080949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80809492021-04-29 Incidence, Management and Outcomes in Women Undergoing Peripartum Hysterectomy in a Tertiary Care Centre in India Chaudhary, Vidhi Singh, Meenakshi Nain, Shilpi Reena, FNU Aggarwal, Kiran Biswas, Ratna Puri, Manju Pujari, Janithya Cureus Obstetrics/Gynecology Background Peripartum hysterectomy (PRH) is the surgical removal of the uterus performed in obstetrical complications such as uncontrolled postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), unrepairable uterine rupture, and sepsis. Its incidence has increased in recent years. The objective of this study was to review all the cases of PRH in a tertiary care teaching hospital over three years (January 2017-December 2019) to determine its incidence and analyse clinico-demographic characteristics in these women. Method All women undergoing PRH from January 2017 to December 2019 were included in the study. Data were collected retrospectively from medical records, of patients who underwent a PRH at the time of delivery, or within 24 hours, or performed any time before discharge from the same hospitalization and obstetric event. The total number of deliveries including caesarean and vaginal deliveries were recorded. Main outcome measures were the incidence of PRH, indication for hysterectomy, management option used, maternal outcomes (PPH, bladder injury and maternal death) and fetal outcomes (stillbirth). Results There were a total of 3904,4 deliveries; 27,337 vaginal and 11,697 caesarean sections in three years. A total of 50 patients underwent a PRH. The incidence of PRH in our study was 1.3 per 1,000 deliveries and 3.5/1,000 caesareans, respectively. PRH was found to be more common following cesarean sections than vaginal deliveries (odds ratio 22.86 [95% CI: 8.16 to 63.98]). Morbid adherent placenta (MAP) (n=30, 62%) was the most common indications of PRH. Seven (15%) women had PRH due to uterine rupture. Twenty-seven women of the 30 women (90%) with the MAP had a previous caesarean delivery. The case fatality rate per hysterectomy was 4%. Stillbirth rate (SBR: n=8,16%) among women having PRH was seven-fold higher than overall SBR in our country. Conclusion There has been a rise in MAP as an indication of PRH in our study for a decade in comparison to uterine atony. Caesarean delivery is a significant risk factor for PRH. Previous caesarean section and major placenta previa were common occurring obstetric risk factors present in the MAP in our cohort. Our maternal mortality in PRH was low and the stillbirth rate was high when compared with national data. Cureus 2021-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8080949/ /pubmed/33936882 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14171 Text en Copyright © 2021, Chaudhary et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Obstetrics/Gynecology
Chaudhary, Vidhi
Singh, Meenakshi
Nain, Shilpi
Reena, FNU
Aggarwal, Kiran
Biswas, Ratna
Puri, Manju
Pujari, Janithya
Incidence, Management and Outcomes in Women Undergoing Peripartum Hysterectomy in a Tertiary Care Centre in India
title Incidence, Management and Outcomes in Women Undergoing Peripartum Hysterectomy in a Tertiary Care Centre in India
title_full Incidence, Management and Outcomes in Women Undergoing Peripartum Hysterectomy in a Tertiary Care Centre in India
title_fullStr Incidence, Management and Outcomes in Women Undergoing Peripartum Hysterectomy in a Tertiary Care Centre in India
title_full_unstemmed Incidence, Management and Outcomes in Women Undergoing Peripartum Hysterectomy in a Tertiary Care Centre in India
title_short Incidence, Management and Outcomes in Women Undergoing Peripartum Hysterectomy in a Tertiary Care Centre in India
title_sort incidence, management and outcomes in women undergoing peripartum hysterectomy in a tertiary care centre in india
topic Obstetrics/Gynecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8080949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33936882
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14171
work_keys_str_mv AT chaudharyvidhi incidencemanagementandoutcomesinwomenundergoingperipartumhysterectomyinatertiarycarecentreinindia
AT singhmeenakshi incidencemanagementandoutcomesinwomenundergoingperipartumhysterectomyinatertiarycarecentreinindia
AT nainshilpi incidencemanagementandoutcomesinwomenundergoingperipartumhysterectomyinatertiarycarecentreinindia
AT reenafnu incidencemanagementandoutcomesinwomenundergoingperipartumhysterectomyinatertiarycarecentreinindia
AT aggarwalkiran incidencemanagementandoutcomesinwomenundergoingperipartumhysterectomyinatertiarycarecentreinindia
AT biswasratna incidencemanagementandoutcomesinwomenundergoingperipartumhysterectomyinatertiarycarecentreinindia
AT purimanju incidencemanagementandoutcomesinwomenundergoingperipartumhysterectomyinatertiarycarecentreinindia
AT pujarijanithya incidencemanagementandoutcomesinwomenundergoingperipartumhysterectomyinatertiarycarecentreinindia