Cargando…
Laparoscopic Versus Open Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Introduction Most of the patients with rectal prolapse complain of fecal incontinence followed by constipation. Surgery is the only definitive treatment option for rectal prolapse. There are two approaches: either transanal/perineal or transabdominal. The abdominal procedures can be done in the open...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8080988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33936886 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14175 |
_version_ | 1783685547844173824 |
---|---|
author | Mohapatra, Kailash Chandra Swain, Narendranath Patro, Srikant Sahoo, Ashok Kumar Sahoo, Ashish Kumar Mishra, Ashish Kumar |
author_facet | Mohapatra, Kailash Chandra Swain, Narendranath Patro, Srikant Sahoo, Ashok Kumar Sahoo, Ashish Kumar Mishra, Ashish Kumar |
author_sort | Mohapatra, Kailash Chandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction Most of the patients with rectal prolapse complain of fecal incontinence followed by constipation. Surgery is the only definitive treatment option for rectal prolapse. There are two approaches: either transanal/perineal or transabdominal. The abdominal procedures can be done in the open laparotomy method or laparoscopically. Suture rectopexy is a very old and popular method of treating rectal prolapse. Nowadays, rectopexy by laparoscopic approach is considered the gold standard treatment for rectal prolapse. The study has been conducted to compare both the procedures and their outcomes in terms of conditions associated with rectal prolapse. Methods All consecutive patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse who had attended the surgery outpatient department were included in the study. The patients had undergone either open suture rectopexy or laparoscopic rectopexy after randomization. Assessment of postoperative pain, mean days of hospital stay, constipation, and incontinence score along with operative time, recurrence within six months of follow-up, and time to resume bowel activity were done. The patients were followed up for 18 months at regular intervals. Results A total of 58 patients were included in the study: 27 in the open group and 31 in the laparoscopic group. The operative time was 102 minutes versus 129 minutes (p=0.0001) in the open and laparoscopic groups, respectively. The laparoscopic group had an earlier resumption of bowel activity (3.1 days vs. 1.4 days [p=0.0001]); fewer days of hospital stay (6.8 days vs. 2.5 days [p=0.0001]), less postoperative pain (mean visual analogue scale score for pain on postoperative day one 4.0 versus 3.1 [p=0.0035] and on postoperative day two 3.8 versus 2.2 [p=0.0001]). There was no significant difference in postoperative constipation score and incontinence score between the two groups. Conclusion Laparoscopic rectopexy results in lesser postoperative pain, lesser hospital stay, and better patient satisfaction than open rectopexy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8080988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80809882021-04-29 Laparoscopic Versus Open Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A Randomized Controlled Trial Mohapatra, Kailash Chandra Swain, Narendranath Patro, Srikant Sahoo, Ashok Kumar Sahoo, Ashish Kumar Mishra, Ashish Kumar Cureus Gastroenterology Introduction Most of the patients with rectal prolapse complain of fecal incontinence followed by constipation. Surgery is the only definitive treatment option for rectal prolapse. There are two approaches: either transanal/perineal or transabdominal. The abdominal procedures can be done in the open laparotomy method or laparoscopically. Suture rectopexy is a very old and popular method of treating rectal prolapse. Nowadays, rectopexy by laparoscopic approach is considered the gold standard treatment for rectal prolapse. The study has been conducted to compare both the procedures and their outcomes in terms of conditions associated with rectal prolapse. Methods All consecutive patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse who had attended the surgery outpatient department were included in the study. The patients had undergone either open suture rectopexy or laparoscopic rectopexy after randomization. Assessment of postoperative pain, mean days of hospital stay, constipation, and incontinence score along with operative time, recurrence within six months of follow-up, and time to resume bowel activity were done. The patients were followed up for 18 months at regular intervals. Results A total of 58 patients were included in the study: 27 in the open group and 31 in the laparoscopic group. The operative time was 102 minutes versus 129 minutes (p=0.0001) in the open and laparoscopic groups, respectively. The laparoscopic group had an earlier resumption of bowel activity (3.1 days vs. 1.4 days [p=0.0001]); fewer days of hospital stay (6.8 days vs. 2.5 days [p=0.0001]), less postoperative pain (mean visual analogue scale score for pain on postoperative day one 4.0 versus 3.1 [p=0.0035] and on postoperative day two 3.8 versus 2.2 [p=0.0001]). There was no significant difference in postoperative constipation score and incontinence score between the two groups. Conclusion Laparoscopic rectopexy results in lesser postoperative pain, lesser hospital stay, and better patient satisfaction than open rectopexy. Cureus 2021-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8080988/ /pubmed/33936886 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14175 Text en Copyright © 2021, Mohapatra et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Gastroenterology Mohapatra, Kailash Chandra Swain, Narendranath Patro, Srikant Sahoo, Ashok Kumar Sahoo, Ashish Kumar Mishra, Ashish Kumar Laparoscopic Versus Open Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Laparoscopic Versus Open Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Laparoscopic Versus Open Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic Versus Open Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic Versus Open Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Laparoscopic Versus Open Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | laparoscopic versus open rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Gastroenterology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8080988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33936886 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14175 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohapatrakailashchandra laparoscopicversusopenrectopexyforrectalprolapsearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT swainnarendranath laparoscopicversusopenrectopexyforrectalprolapsearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT patrosrikant laparoscopicversusopenrectopexyforrectalprolapsearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sahooashokkumar laparoscopicversusopenrectopexyforrectalprolapsearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sahooashishkumar laparoscopicversusopenrectopexyforrectalprolapsearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mishraashishkumar laparoscopicversusopenrectopexyforrectalprolapsearandomizedcontrolledtrial |