Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of propofol and combination of propofol-dexmedetomidine in adjunct with topical airway anesthesia for rigid bronchoscopy: A randomized double-blinded prospective study
CONTEXT: Rigid bronchoscopy (RB) procedures require continuous vigilance and monitoring. Such procedures warrant proper ventilation strategy and titration of potent short-acting anesthetics. AIMS: To compare propofol with the propofol-dexmedetomidine in conjunction with topical airway anesthesia in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8081131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33938832 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_45_19 |
_version_ | 1783685574485344256 |
---|---|
author | Paul, Mekhla Rastogi, Amit Chatterje, Arindam Agarwal, Aarti Mishra, Prabhaker Khan, Ajmal |
author_facet | Paul, Mekhla Rastogi, Amit Chatterje, Arindam Agarwal, Aarti Mishra, Prabhaker Khan, Ajmal |
author_sort | Paul, Mekhla |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: Rigid bronchoscopy (RB) procedures require continuous vigilance and monitoring. Such procedures warrant proper ventilation strategy and titration of potent short-acting anesthetics. AIMS: To compare propofol with the propofol-dexmedetomidine in conjunction with topical airway anesthesia in two groups during spontaneous assisted ventilation on peri-procedural hemodynamic stability. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was done on 40 patients who were randomized in two groups, 20 patients in each group; PS (Propofol+ Normal saline) and PD (Propofol+ Dexmedetomidine) group. All patients in both groups were induced with 1% IV propofol (1–3 mg/kg), IV midazolam (0.05 mg/kg), and IV fentanyl (2 μ/kg). PS group received propofol infusion for maintenance along with saline infusion 10 min before induction, whereas PD group also received propofol infusion for maintenance along with Injection dexmedetomidine infusion 10 min before induction. Outcome measured were heart rate (HR), mean blood pressure (MBP), oxygen saturation (SpO(2)), and post-procedure awakening using Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAAS) scale and complications. RESULTS: In both the groups, MBP decreased significantly from baseline, however, when MBP were compared at the same time points between the groups there were no significant differences. In PD group, HR remained significantly lower when compared with baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 min time points when compared with PS group. Number of patients who developed hypotension requiring vasoactive drugs, their mean dose and duration of hypotension were more in PD group, and they awoke with significant delay. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol is better than combination of propofol and dexmedetomidine when given in adjunct with topical airway anesthesia for RB in view of early awakening, lesser duration of intra-procedural hypotension, and lesser requirement of vasoactive agents. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8081131 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80811312021-06-02 Comparative evaluation of propofol and combination of propofol-dexmedetomidine in adjunct with topical airway anesthesia for rigid bronchoscopy: A randomized double-blinded prospective study Paul, Mekhla Rastogi, Amit Chatterje, Arindam Agarwal, Aarti Mishra, Prabhaker Khan, Ajmal Ann Card Anaesth Original Article CONTEXT: Rigid bronchoscopy (RB) procedures require continuous vigilance and monitoring. Such procedures warrant proper ventilation strategy and titration of potent short-acting anesthetics. AIMS: To compare propofol with the propofol-dexmedetomidine in conjunction with topical airway anesthesia in two groups during spontaneous assisted ventilation on peri-procedural hemodynamic stability. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was done on 40 patients who were randomized in two groups, 20 patients in each group; PS (Propofol+ Normal saline) and PD (Propofol+ Dexmedetomidine) group. All patients in both groups were induced with 1% IV propofol (1–3 mg/kg), IV midazolam (0.05 mg/kg), and IV fentanyl (2 μ/kg). PS group received propofol infusion for maintenance along with saline infusion 10 min before induction, whereas PD group also received propofol infusion for maintenance along with Injection dexmedetomidine infusion 10 min before induction. Outcome measured were heart rate (HR), mean blood pressure (MBP), oxygen saturation (SpO(2)), and post-procedure awakening using Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAAS) scale and complications. RESULTS: In both the groups, MBP decreased significantly from baseline, however, when MBP were compared at the same time points between the groups there were no significant differences. In PD group, HR remained significantly lower when compared with baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 min time points when compared with PS group. Number of patients who developed hypotension requiring vasoactive drugs, their mean dose and duration of hypotension were more in PD group, and they awoke with significant delay. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol is better than combination of propofol and dexmedetomidine when given in adjunct with topical airway anesthesia for RB in view of early awakening, lesser duration of intra-procedural hypotension, and lesser requirement of vasoactive agents. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8081131/ /pubmed/33938832 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_45_19 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Paul, Mekhla Rastogi, Amit Chatterje, Arindam Agarwal, Aarti Mishra, Prabhaker Khan, Ajmal Comparative evaluation of propofol and combination of propofol-dexmedetomidine in adjunct with topical airway anesthesia for rigid bronchoscopy: A randomized double-blinded prospective study |
title | Comparative evaluation of propofol and combination of propofol-dexmedetomidine in adjunct with topical airway anesthesia for rigid bronchoscopy: A randomized double-blinded prospective study |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of propofol and combination of propofol-dexmedetomidine in adjunct with topical airway anesthesia for rigid bronchoscopy: A randomized double-blinded prospective study |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of propofol and combination of propofol-dexmedetomidine in adjunct with topical airway anesthesia for rigid bronchoscopy: A randomized double-blinded prospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of propofol and combination of propofol-dexmedetomidine in adjunct with topical airway anesthesia for rigid bronchoscopy: A randomized double-blinded prospective study |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of propofol and combination of propofol-dexmedetomidine in adjunct with topical airway anesthesia for rigid bronchoscopy: A randomized double-blinded prospective study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of propofol and combination of propofol-dexmedetomidine in adjunct with topical airway anesthesia for rigid bronchoscopy: a randomized double-blinded prospective study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8081131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33938832 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_45_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paulmekhla comparativeevaluationofpropofolandcombinationofpropofoldexmedetomidineinadjunctwithtopicalairwayanesthesiaforrigidbronchoscopyarandomizeddoubleblindedprospectivestudy AT rastogiamit comparativeevaluationofpropofolandcombinationofpropofoldexmedetomidineinadjunctwithtopicalairwayanesthesiaforrigidbronchoscopyarandomizeddoubleblindedprospectivestudy AT chatterjearindam comparativeevaluationofpropofolandcombinationofpropofoldexmedetomidineinadjunctwithtopicalairwayanesthesiaforrigidbronchoscopyarandomizeddoubleblindedprospectivestudy AT agarwalaarti comparativeevaluationofpropofolandcombinationofpropofoldexmedetomidineinadjunctwithtopicalairwayanesthesiaforrigidbronchoscopyarandomizeddoubleblindedprospectivestudy AT mishraprabhaker comparativeevaluationofpropofolandcombinationofpropofoldexmedetomidineinadjunctwithtopicalairwayanesthesiaforrigidbronchoscopyarandomizeddoubleblindedprospectivestudy AT khanajmal comparativeevaluationofpropofolandcombinationofpropofoldexmedetomidineinadjunctwithtopicalairwayanesthesiaforrigidbronchoscopyarandomizeddoubleblindedprospectivestudy |