Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of propofol and combination of propofol-dexmedetomidine in adjunct with topical airway anesthesia for rigid bronchoscopy: A randomized double-blinded prospective study

CONTEXT: Rigid bronchoscopy (RB) procedures require continuous vigilance and monitoring. Such procedures warrant proper ventilation strategy and titration of potent short-acting anesthetics. AIMS: To compare propofol with the propofol-dexmedetomidine in conjunction with topical airway anesthesia in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paul, Mekhla, Rastogi, Amit, Chatterje, Arindam, Agarwal, Aarti, Mishra, Prabhaker, Khan, Ajmal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8081131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33938832
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_45_19
_version_ 1783685574485344256
author Paul, Mekhla
Rastogi, Amit
Chatterje, Arindam
Agarwal, Aarti
Mishra, Prabhaker
Khan, Ajmal
author_facet Paul, Mekhla
Rastogi, Amit
Chatterje, Arindam
Agarwal, Aarti
Mishra, Prabhaker
Khan, Ajmal
author_sort Paul, Mekhla
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Rigid bronchoscopy (RB) procedures require continuous vigilance and monitoring. Such procedures warrant proper ventilation strategy and titration of potent short-acting anesthetics. AIMS: To compare propofol with the propofol-dexmedetomidine in conjunction with topical airway anesthesia in two groups during spontaneous assisted ventilation on peri-procedural hemodynamic stability. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was done on 40 patients who were randomized in two groups, 20 patients in each group; PS (Propofol+ Normal saline) and PD (Propofol+ Dexmedetomidine) group. All patients in both groups were induced with 1% IV propofol (1–3 mg/kg), IV midazolam (0.05 mg/kg), and IV fentanyl (2 μ/kg). PS group received propofol infusion for maintenance along with saline infusion 10 min before induction, whereas PD group also received propofol infusion for maintenance along with Injection dexmedetomidine infusion 10 min before induction. Outcome measured were heart rate (HR), mean blood pressure (MBP), oxygen saturation (SpO(2)), and post-procedure awakening using Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAAS) scale and complications. RESULTS: In both the groups, MBP decreased significantly from baseline, however, when MBP were compared at the same time points between the groups there were no significant differences. In PD group, HR remained significantly lower when compared with baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 min time points when compared with PS group. Number of patients who developed hypotension requiring vasoactive drugs, their mean dose and duration of hypotension were more in PD group, and they awoke with significant delay. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol is better than combination of propofol and dexmedetomidine when given in adjunct with topical airway anesthesia for RB in view of early awakening, lesser duration of intra-procedural hypotension, and lesser requirement of vasoactive agents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8081131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80811312021-06-02 Comparative evaluation of propofol and combination of propofol-dexmedetomidine in adjunct with topical airway anesthesia for rigid bronchoscopy: A randomized double-blinded prospective study Paul, Mekhla Rastogi, Amit Chatterje, Arindam Agarwal, Aarti Mishra, Prabhaker Khan, Ajmal Ann Card Anaesth Original Article CONTEXT: Rigid bronchoscopy (RB) procedures require continuous vigilance and monitoring. Such procedures warrant proper ventilation strategy and titration of potent short-acting anesthetics. AIMS: To compare propofol with the propofol-dexmedetomidine in conjunction with topical airway anesthesia in two groups during spontaneous assisted ventilation on peri-procedural hemodynamic stability. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was done on 40 patients who were randomized in two groups, 20 patients in each group; PS (Propofol+ Normal saline) and PD (Propofol+ Dexmedetomidine) group. All patients in both groups were induced with 1% IV propofol (1–3 mg/kg), IV midazolam (0.05 mg/kg), and IV fentanyl (2 μ/kg). PS group received propofol infusion for maintenance along with saline infusion 10 min before induction, whereas PD group also received propofol infusion for maintenance along with Injection dexmedetomidine infusion 10 min before induction. Outcome measured were heart rate (HR), mean blood pressure (MBP), oxygen saturation (SpO(2)), and post-procedure awakening using Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAAS) scale and complications. RESULTS: In both the groups, MBP decreased significantly from baseline, however, when MBP were compared at the same time points between the groups there were no significant differences. In PD group, HR remained significantly lower when compared with baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 min time points when compared with PS group. Number of patients who developed hypotension requiring vasoactive drugs, their mean dose and duration of hypotension were more in PD group, and they awoke with significant delay. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol is better than combination of propofol and dexmedetomidine when given in adjunct with topical airway anesthesia for RB in view of early awakening, lesser duration of intra-procedural hypotension, and lesser requirement of vasoactive agents. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8081131/ /pubmed/33938832 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_45_19 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Paul, Mekhla
Rastogi, Amit
Chatterje, Arindam
Agarwal, Aarti
Mishra, Prabhaker
Khan, Ajmal
Comparative evaluation of propofol and combination of propofol-dexmedetomidine in adjunct with topical airway anesthesia for rigid bronchoscopy: A randomized double-blinded prospective study
title Comparative evaluation of propofol and combination of propofol-dexmedetomidine in adjunct with topical airway anesthesia for rigid bronchoscopy: A randomized double-blinded prospective study
title_full Comparative evaluation of propofol and combination of propofol-dexmedetomidine in adjunct with topical airway anesthesia for rigid bronchoscopy: A randomized double-blinded prospective study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of propofol and combination of propofol-dexmedetomidine in adjunct with topical airway anesthesia for rigid bronchoscopy: A randomized double-blinded prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of propofol and combination of propofol-dexmedetomidine in adjunct with topical airway anesthesia for rigid bronchoscopy: A randomized double-blinded prospective study
title_short Comparative evaluation of propofol and combination of propofol-dexmedetomidine in adjunct with topical airway anesthesia for rigid bronchoscopy: A randomized double-blinded prospective study
title_sort comparative evaluation of propofol and combination of propofol-dexmedetomidine in adjunct with topical airway anesthesia for rigid bronchoscopy: a randomized double-blinded prospective study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8081131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33938832
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_45_19
work_keys_str_mv AT paulmekhla comparativeevaluationofpropofolandcombinationofpropofoldexmedetomidineinadjunctwithtopicalairwayanesthesiaforrigidbronchoscopyarandomizeddoubleblindedprospectivestudy
AT rastogiamit comparativeevaluationofpropofolandcombinationofpropofoldexmedetomidineinadjunctwithtopicalairwayanesthesiaforrigidbronchoscopyarandomizeddoubleblindedprospectivestudy
AT chatterjearindam comparativeevaluationofpropofolandcombinationofpropofoldexmedetomidineinadjunctwithtopicalairwayanesthesiaforrigidbronchoscopyarandomizeddoubleblindedprospectivestudy
AT agarwalaarti comparativeevaluationofpropofolandcombinationofpropofoldexmedetomidineinadjunctwithtopicalairwayanesthesiaforrigidbronchoscopyarandomizeddoubleblindedprospectivestudy
AT mishraprabhaker comparativeevaluationofpropofolandcombinationofpropofoldexmedetomidineinadjunctwithtopicalairwayanesthesiaforrigidbronchoscopyarandomizeddoubleblindedprospectivestudy
AT khanajmal comparativeevaluationofpropofolandcombinationofpropofoldexmedetomidineinadjunctwithtopicalairwayanesthesiaforrigidbronchoscopyarandomizeddoubleblindedprospectivestudy