Cargando…
Web-Based Cognitive Testing of Older Adults in Person Versus at Home: Within-Subjects Comparison Study
BACKGROUND: Web-based research allows cognitive psychologists to collect high-quality data from a diverse pool of participants with fewer resources. However, web-based testing presents unique challenges for researchers and clinicians working with aging populations. Older adults may be less familiar...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8081157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33522972 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/23384 |
_version_ | 1783685580682428416 |
---|---|
author | Cyr, Andrée-Ann Romero, Kristoffer Galin-Corini, Laura |
author_facet | Cyr, Andrée-Ann Romero, Kristoffer Galin-Corini, Laura |
author_sort | Cyr, Andrée-Ann |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Web-based research allows cognitive psychologists to collect high-quality data from a diverse pool of participants with fewer resources. However, web-based testing presents unique challenges for researchers and clinicians working with aging populations. Older adults may be less familiar with computer usage than their younger peers, leading to differences in performance when completing web-based tasks in their home versus in the laboratory under the supervision of an experimenter. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to use a within-subjects design to compare the performance of healthy older adults on computerized cognitive tasks completed at home and in the laboratory. Familiarity and attitudes surrounding computer use were also examined. METHODS: In total, 32 community-dwelling healthy adults aged above 65 years completed computerized versions of the word-color Stroop task, paired associates learning, and verbal and matrix reasoning in 2 testing environments: at home (unsupervised) and in the laboratory (supervised). The paper-and-pencil neuropsychological versions of these tasks were also administered, along with questionnaires examining computer attitudes and familiarity. The order of testing environments was counterbalanced across participants. RESULTS: Analyses of variance conducted on scores from the computerized cognitive tasks revealed no significant effect of the testing environment and no correlation with computer familiarity or attitudes. These null effects were confirmed with follow-up Bayesian analyses. Moreover, performance on the computerized tasks correlated positively with performance on their paper-and-pencil equivalents. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show comparable performance on computerized cognitive tasks in at-home and laboratory testing environments. These findings have implications for researchers and clinicians wishing to harness web-based testing to collect meaningful data from older adult populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8081157 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80811572021-05-06 Web-Based Cognitive Testing of Older Adults in Person Versus at Home: Within-Subjects Comparison Study Cyr, Andrée-Ann Romero, Kristoffer Galin-Corini, Laura JMIR Aging Original Paper BACKGROUND: Web-based research allows cognitive psychologists to collect high-quality data from a diverse pool of participants with fewer resources. However, web-based testing presents unique challenges for researchers and clinicians working with aging populations. Older adults may be less familiar with computer usage than their younger peers, leading to differences in performance when completing web-based tasks in their home versus in the laboratory under the supervision of an experimenter. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to use a within-subjects design to compare the performance of healthy older adults on computerized cognitive tasks completed at home and in the laboratory. Familiarity and attitudes surrounding computer use were also examined. METHODS: In total, 32 community-dwelling healthy adults aged above 65 years completed computerized versions of the word-color Stroop task, paired associates learning, and verbal and matrix reasoning in 2 testing environments: at home (unsupervised) and in the laboratory (supervised). The paper-and-pencil neuropsychological versions of these tasks were also administered, along with questionnaires examining computer attitudes and familiarity. The order of testing environments was counterbalanced across participants. RESULTS: Analyses of variance conducted on scores from the computerized cognitive tasks revealed no significant effect of the testing environment and no correlation with computer familiarity or attitudes. These null effects were confirmed with follow-up Bayesian analyses. Moreover, performance on the computerized tasks correlated positively with performance on their paper-and-pencil equivalents. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show comparable performance on computerized cognitive tasks in at-home and laboratory testing environments. These findings have implications for researchers and clinicians wishing to harness web-based testing to collect meaningful data from older adult populations. JMIR Publications 2021-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8081157/ /pubmed/33522972 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/23384 Text en ©Andrée-Ann Cyr, Kristoffer Romero, Laura Galin-Corini. Originally published in JMIR Aging (http://aging.jmir.org), 01.02.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Aging, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://aging.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Cyr, Andrée-Ann Romero, Kristoffer Galin-Corini, Laura Web-Based Cognitive Testing of Older Adults in Person Versus at Home: Within-Subjects Comparison Study |
title | Web-Based Cognitive Testing of Older Adults in Person Versus at Home: Within-Subjects Comparison Study |
title_full | Web-Based Cognitive Testing of Older Adults in Person Versus at Home: Within-Subjects Comparison Study |
title_fullStr | Web-Based Cognitive Testing of Older Adults in Person Versus at Home: Within-Subjects Comparison Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Web-Based Cognitive Testing of Older Adults in Person Versus at Home: Within-Subjects Comparison Study |
title_short | Web-Based Cognitive Testing of Older Adults in Person Versus at Home: Within-Subjects Comparison Study |
title_sort | web-based cognitive testing of older adults in person versus at home: within-subjects comparison study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8081157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33522972 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/23384 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cyrandreeann webbasedcognitivetestingofolderadultsinpersonversusathomewithinsubjectscomparisonstudy AT romerokristoffer webbasedcognitivetestingofolderadultsinpersonversusathomewithinsubjectscomparisonstudy AT galincorinilaura webbasedcognitivetestingofolderadultsinpersonversusathomewithinsubjectscomparisonstudy |