Cargando…
Target specific serologic analysis of COVID-19 convalescent plasma
This study compared the performance of four serology assays for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and investigated whether COVID-19 disease history correlates with assay performance. Samples were tested at Northshore using the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (Roche Diagnostics), Access SARS-CoV-2 IgG anti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8081213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33909632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249938 |
_version_ | 1783685594437648384 |
---|---|
author | Ikegami, Sachie Benirschke, Robert C. Fakhrai-Rad, Hossein Motamedi, Mohammad H. Hockett, Rick David, Sean Lee, Hong Kee Kang, Jason Gniadek, Thomas J. |
author_facet | Ikegami, Sachie Benirschke, Robert C. Fakhrai-Rad, Hossein Motamedi, Mohammad H. Hockett, Rick David, Sean Lee, Hong Kee Kang, Jason Gniadek, Thomas J. |
author_sort | Ikegami, Sachie |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study compared the performance of four serology assays for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and investigated whether COVID-19 disease history correlates with assay performance. Samples were tested at Northshore using the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (Roche Diagnostics), Access SARS-CoV-2 IgG anti-RBD (Beckman Coulter), and LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG (DiaSorin) as well as at Genalyte using Maverick Multi-Antigen Serology Panel. The study included one hundred clinical samples collected before December 2019 and ninety-seven samples collected from convalescent plasma donors originally diagnosed with COVID-19 by PCR. COVID-19 disease history was self-reported by the plasma donors. There was no difference in specificity between the assays tested. Clinical sensitivity of these four tests was 98% (Genalyte), 96% (Roche), 92% (DiaSorin), and 87% (Beckman). The only statistically significant differences in clinical sensitivity was between the Beckman assay and both Genalyte and Roche assays. Convalescent plasma donor characteristics and disease symptoms did not correlate with false negative results from the Beckman and DiaSorin assays. All four tests showed high specificity (100%) and varying sensitivities (89–98%). No correlations between disease history and serology results were observed. The Genalyte Multiplex assay showed as good or better sensitivity to three other previously validated assays with FDA Emergency Use Authorizations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8081213 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80812132021-05-06 Target specific serologic analysis of COVID-19 convalescent plasma Ikegami, Sachie Benirschke, Robert C. Fakhrai-Rad, Hossein Motamedi, Mohammad H. Hockett, Rick David, Sean Lee, Hong Kee Kang, Jason Gniadek, Thomas J. PLoS One Research Article This study compared the performance of four serology assays for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and investigated whether COVID-19 disease history correlates with assay performance. Samples were tested at Northshore using the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (Roche Diagnostics), Access SARS-CoV-2 IgG anti-RBD (Beckman Coulter), and LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG (DiaSorin) as well as at Genalyte using Maverick Multi-Antigen Serology Panel. The study included one hundred clinical samples collected before December 2019 and ninety-seven samples collected from convalescent plasma donors originally diagnosed with COVID-19 by PCR. COVID-19 disease history was self-reported by the plasma donors. There was no difference in specificity between the assays tested. Clinical sensitivity of these four tests was 98% (Genalyte), 96% (Roche), 92% (DiaSorin), and 87% (Beckman). The only statistically significant differences in clinical sensitivity was between the Beckman assay and both Genalyte and Roche assays. Convalescent plasma donor characteristics and disease symptoms did not correlate with false negative results from the Beckman and DiaSorin assays. All four tests showed high specificity (100%) and varying sensitivities (89–98%). No correlations between disease history and serology results were observed. The Genalyte Multiplex assay showed as good or better sensitivity to three other previously validated assays with FDA Emergency Use Authorizations. Public Library of Science 2021-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8081213/ /pubmed/33909632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249938 Text en © 2021 Ikegami et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ikegami, Sachie Benirschke, Robert C. Fakhrai-Rad, Hossein Motamedi, Mohammad H. Hockett, Rick David, Sean Lee, Hong Kee Kang, Jason Gniadek, Thomas J. Target specific serologic analysis of COVID-19 convalescent plasma |
title | Target specific serologic analysis of COVID-19 convalescent plasma |
title_full | Target specific serologic analysis of COVID-19 convalescent plasma |
title_fullStr | Target specific serologic analysis of COVID-19 convalescent plasma |
title_full_unstemmed | Target specific serologic analysis of COVID-19 convalescent plasma |
title_short | Target specific serologic analysis of COVID-19 convalescent plasma |
title_sort | target specific serologic analysis of covid-19 convalescent plasma |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8081213/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33909632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249938 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ikegamisachie targetspecificserologicanalysisofcovid19convalescentplasma AT benirschkerobertc targetspecificserologicanalysisofcovid19convalescentplasma AT fakhrairadhossein targetspecificserologicanalysisofcovid19convalescentplasma AT motamedimohammadh targetspecificserologicanalysisofcovid19convalescentplasma AT hockettrick targetspecificserologicanalysisofcovid19convalescentplasma AT davidsean targetspecificserologicanalysisofcovid19convalescentplasma AT leehongkee targetspecificserologicanalysisofcovid19convalescentplasma AT kangjason targetspecificserologicanalysisofcovid19convalescentplasma AT gniadekthomasj targetspecificserologicanalysisofcovid19convalescentplasma |