Cargando…

Target specific serologic analysis of COVID-19 convalescent plasma

This study compared the performance of four serology assays for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and investigated whether COVID-19 disease history correlates with assay performance. Samples were tested at Northshore using the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (Roche Diagnostics), Access SARS-CoV-2 IgG anti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ikegami, Sachie, Benirschke, Robert C., Fakhrai-Rad, Hossein, Motamedi, Mohammad H., Hockett, Rick, David, Sean, Lee, Hong Kee, Kang, Jason, Gniadek, Thomas J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8081213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33909632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249938
_version_ 1783685594437648384
author Ikegami, Sachie
Benirschke, Robert C.
Fakhrai-Rad, Hossein
Motamedi, Mohammad H.
Hockett, Rick
David, Sean
Lee, Hong Kee
Kang, Jason
Gniadek, Thomas J.
author_facet Ikegami, Sachie
Benirschke, Robert C.
Fakhrai-Rad, Hossein
Motamedi, Mohammad H.
Hockett, Rick
David, Sean
Lee, Hong Kee
Kang, Jason
Gniadek, Thomas J.
author_sort Ikegami, Sachie
collection PubMed
description This study compared the performance of four serology assays for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and investigated whether COVID-19 disease history correlates with assay performance. Samples were tested at Northshore using the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (Roche Diagnostics), Access SARS-CoV-2 IgG anti-RBD (Beckman Coulter), and LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG (DiaSorin) as well as at Genalyte using Maverick Multi-Antigen Serology Panel. The study included one hundred clinical samples collected before December 2019 and ninety-seven samples collected from convalescent plasma donors originally diagnosed with COVID-19 by PCR. COVID-19 disease history was self-reported by the plasma donors. There was no difference in specificity between the assays tested. Clinical sensitivity of these four tests was 98% (Genalyte), 96% (Roche), 92% (DiaSorin), and 87% (Beckman). The only statistically significant differences in clinical sensitivity was between the Beckman assay and both Genalyte and Roche assays. Convalescent plasma donor characteristics and disease symptoms did not correlate with false negative results from the Beckman and DiaSorin assays. All four tests showed high specificity (100%) and varying sensitivities (89–98%). No correlations between disease history and serology results were observed. The Genalyte Multiplex assay showed as good or better sensitivity to three other previously validated assays with FDA Emergency Use Authorizations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8081213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80812132021-05-06 Target specific serologic analysis of COVID-19 convalescent plasma Ikegami, Sachie Benirschke, Robert C. Fakhrai-Rad, Hossein Motamedi, Mohammad H. Hockett, Rick David, Sean Lee, Hong Kee Kang, Jason Gniadek, Thomas J. PLoS One Research Article This study compared the performance of four serology assays for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and investigated whether COVID-19 disease history correlates with assay performance. Samples were tested at Northshore using the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (Roche Diagnostics), Access SARS-CoV-2 IgG anti-RBD (Beckman Coulter), and LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG (DiaSorin) as well as at Genalyte using Maverick Multi-Antigen Serology Panel. The study included one hundred clinical samples collected before December 2019 and ninety-seven samples collected from convalescent plasma donors originally diagnosed with COVID-19 by PCR. COVID-19 disease history was self-reported by the plasma donors. There was no difference in specificity between the assays tested. Clinical sensitivity of these four tests was 98% (Genalyte), 96% (Roche), 92% (DiaSorin), and 87% (Beckman). The only statistically significant differences in clinical sensitivity was between the Beckman assay and both Genalyte and Roche assays. Convalescent plasma donor characteristics and disease symptoms did not correlate with false negative results from the Beckman and DiaSorin assays. All four tests showed high specificity (100%) and varying sensitivities (89–98%). No correlations between disease history and serology results were observed. The Genalyte Multiplex assay showed as good or better sensitivity to three other previously validated assays with FDA Emergency Use Authorizations. Public Library of Science 2021-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8081213/ /pubmed/33909632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249938 Text en © 2021 Ikegami et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ikegami, Sachie
Benirschke, Robert C.
Fakhrai-Rad, Hossein
Motamedi, Mohammad H.
Hockett, Rick
David, Sean
Lee, Hong Kee
Kang, Jason
Gniadek, Thomas J.
Target specific serologic analysis of COVID-19 convalescent plasma
title Target specific serologic analysis of COVID-19 convalescent plasma
title_full Target specific serologic analysis of COVID-19 convalescent plasma
title_fullStr Target specific serologic analysis of COVID-19 convalescent plasma
title_full_unstemmed Target specific serologic analysis of COVID-19 convalescent plasma
title_short Target specific serologic analysis of COVID-19 convalescent plasma
title_sort target specific serologic analysis of covid-19 convalescent plasma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8081213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33909632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249938
work_keys_str_mv AT ikegamisachie targetspecificserologicanalysisofcovid19convalescentplasma
AT benirschkerobertc targetspecificserologicanalysisofcovid19convalescentplasma
AT fakhrairadhossein targetspecificserologicanalysisofcovid19convalescentplasma
AT motamedimohammadh targetspecificserologicanalysisofcovid19convalescentplasma
AT hockettrick targetspecificserologicanalysisofcovid19convalescentplasma
AT davidsean targetspecificserologicanalysisofcovid19convalescentplasma
AT leehongkee targetspecificserologicanalysisofcovid19convalescentplasma
AT kangjason targetspecificserologicanalysisofcovid19convalescentplasma
AT gniadekthomasj targetspecificserologicanalysisofcovid19convalescentplasma