Cargando…

Validation of the 3D reconstructed human skin Comet assay, an animal-free alternative for following-up positive results from standard in vitro genotoxicity assays

As part of the safety assessment process, all industrial sectors employ genotoxicity test batteries, starting with well-established in vitro assays. However, these batteries have limited predictive capacity for the in vivo situation, which may result in unnecessary follow-up in vivo testing or the l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pfuhler, Stefan, Pirow, Ralph, Downs, Thomas R, Haase, Andrea, Hewitt, Nicola, Luch, Andreas, Merkel, Marion, Petrick, Claudia, Said, André, Schäfer-Korting, Monika, Reisinger, Kerstin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8081376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32152633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geaa009
_version_ 1783685626987544576
author Pfuhler, Stefan
Pirow, Ralph
Downs, Thomas R
Haase, Andrea
Hewitt, Nicola
Luch, Andreas
Merkel, Marion
Petrick, Claudia
Said, André
Schäfer-Korting, Monika
Reisinger, Kerstin
author_facet Pfuhler, Stefan
Pirow, Ralph
Downs, Thomas R
Haase, Andrea
Hewitt, Nicola
Luch, Andreas
Merkel, Marion
Petrick, Claudia
Said, André
Schäfer-Korting, Monika
Reisinger, Kerstin
author_sort Pfuhler, Stefan
collection PubMed
description As part of the safety assessment process, all industrial sectors employ genotoxicity test batteries, starting with well-established in vitro assays. However, these batteries have limited predictive capacity for the in vivo situation, which may result in unnecessary follow-up in vivo testing or the loss of promising substances where animal tests are prohibited or not desired. To address this, a project involving regulators, academia and industry was established to develop and validate in vitro human skin-based genotoxicity assays for topically exposed substances, such as cosmetics ingredients. Here, we describe the validation of the 3D reconstructed skin (RS) Comet assay. In this multicenter study, chemicals were applied topically three times to the skin over 48 h. Isolated keratinocytes and fibroblasts were transferred to slides before electrophoresis and the resulting comet formation was recorded as % tail DNA. Before decoding, results of the validation exercise for 32 substances were evaluated by an independent statistician. There was a high predictive capacity of this assay when compared to in vivo outcomes, with a sensitivity of 77 (80)%, a specificity of 88 (97)% and an overall accuracy of 83 (92)%. The numbers reflect the calls of the performing laboratories in the coded phase, whereas those in parenthesis reflect calls according to the agreed evaluation criteria. Intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility was also very good, with a concordance of 93 and 88%, respectively. These results generated with the Phenion® Full-Thickness skin model demonstrate its suitability for this assay, with reproducibly low background DNA damage and sufficient metabolic capacity to activate pro-mutagens. The validation outcome supports the use of the RS Comet assay to follow up positive results from standard in vitro genotoxicity assays when the expected route of exposure is dermal. Based on the available data, the assay was accepted recently into the OECD test guideline development program.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8081376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80813762021-05-03 Validation of the 3D reconstructed human skin Comet assay, an animal-free alternative for following-up positive results from standard in vitro genotoxicity assays Pfuhler, Stefan Pirow, Ralph Downs, Thomas R Haase, Andrea Hewitt, Nicola Luch, Andreas Merkel, Marion Petrick, Claudia Said, André Schäfer-Korting, Monika Reisinger, Kerstin Mutagenesis Original Manuscripts As part of the safety assessment process, all industrial sectors employ genotoxicity test batteries, starting with well-established in vitro assays. However, these batteries have limited predictive capacity for the in vivo situation, which may result in unnecessary follow-up in vivo testing or the loss of promising substances where animal tests are prohibited or not desired. To address this, a project involving regulators, academia and industry was established to develop and validate in vitro human skin-based genotoxicity assays for topically exposed substances, such as cosmetics ingredients. Here, we describe the validation of the 3D reconstructed skin (RS) Comet assay. In this multicenter study, chemicals were applied topically three times to the skin over 48 h. Isolated keratinocytes and fibroblasts were transferred to slides before electrophoresis and the resulting comet formation was recorded as % tail DNA. Before decoding, results of the validation exercise for 32 substances were evaluated by an independent statistician. There was a high predictive capacity of this assay when compared to in vivo outcomes, with a sensitivity of 77 (80)%, a specificity of 88 (97)% and an overall accuracy of 83 (92)%. The numbers reflect the calls of the performing laboratories in the coded phase, whereas those in parenthesis reflect calls according to the agreed evaluation criteria. Intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility was also very good, with a concordance of 93 and 88%, respectively. These results generated with the Phenion® Full-Thickness skin model demonstrate its suitability for this assay, with reproducibly low background DNA damage and sufficient metabolic capacity to activate pro-mutagens. The validation outcome supports the use of the RS Comet assay to follow up positive results from standard in vitro genotoxicity assays when the expected route of exposure is dermal. Based on the available data, the assay was accepted recently into the OECD test guideline development program. Oxford University Press 2020-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8081376/ /pubmed/32152633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geaa009 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Manuscripts
Pfuhler, Stefan
Pirow, Ralph
Downs, Thomas R
Haase, Andrea
Hewitt, Nicola
Luch, Andreas
Merkel, Marion
Petrick, Claudia
Said, André
Schäfer-Korting, Monika
Reisinger, Kerstin
Validation of the 3D reconstructed human skin Comet assay, an animal-free alternative for following-up positive results from standard in vitro genotoxicity assays
title Validation of the 3D reconstructed human skin Comet assay, an animal-free alternative for following-up positive results from standard in vitro genotoxicity assays
title_full Validation of the 3D reconstructed human skin Comet assay, an animal-free alternative for following-up positive results from standard in vitro genotoxicity assays
title_fullStr Validation of the 3D reconstructed human skin Comet assay, an animal-free alternative for following-up positive results from standard in vitro genotoxicity assays
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the 3D reconstructed human skin Comet assay, an animal-free alternative for following-up positive results from standard in vitro genotoxicity assays
title_short Validation of the 3D reconstructed human skin Comet assay, an animal-free alternative for following-up positive results from standard in vitro genotoxicity assays
title_sort validation of the 3d reconstructed human skin comet assay, an animal-free alternative for following-up positive results from standard in vitro genotoxicity assays
topic Original Manuscripts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8081376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32152633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geaa009
work_keys_str_mv AT pfuhlerstefan validationofthe3dreconstructedhumanskincometassayananimalfreealternativeforfollowinguppositiveresultsfromstandardinvitrogenotoxicityassays
AT pirowralph validationofthe3dreconstructedhumanskincometassayananimalfreealternativeforfollowinguppositiveresultsfromstandardinvitrogenotoxicityassays
AT downsthomasr validationofthe3dreconstructedhumanskincometassayananimalfreealternativeforfollowinguppositiveresultsfromstandardinvitrogenotoxicityassays
AT haaseandrea validationofthe3dreconstructedhumanskincometassayananimalfreealternativeforfollowinguppositiveresultsfromstandardinvitrogenotoxicityassays
AT hewittnicola validationofthe3dreconstructedhumanskincometassayananimalfreealternativeforfollowinguppositiveresultsfromstandardinvitrogenotoxicityassays
AT luchandreas validationofthe3dreconstructedhumanskincometassayananimalfreealternativeforfollowinguppositiveresultsfromstandardinvitrogenotoxicityassays
AT merkelmarion validationofthe3dreconstructedhumanskincometassayananimalfreealternativeforfollowinguppositiveresultsfromstandardinvitrogenotoxicityassays
AT petrickclaudia validationofthe3dreconstructedhumanskincometassayananimalfreealternativeforfollowinguppositiveresultsfromstandardinvitrogenotoxicityassays
AT saidandre validationofthe3dreconstructedhumanskincometassayananimalfreealternativeforfollowinguppositiveresultsfromstandardinvitrogenotoxicityassays
AT schaferkortingmonika validationofthe3dreconstructedhumanskincometassayananimalfreealternativeforfollowinguppositiveresultsfromstandardinvitrogenotoxicityassays
AT reisingerkerstin validationofthe3dreconstructedhumanskincometassayananimalfreealternativeforfollowinguppositiveresultsfromstandardinvitrogenotoxicityassays