Cargando…

Impact of Minimally Invasive Aesthetic Procedures on the Psychological and Social Dimensions of Health

BACKGROUND: The impact on psychosocial health of injectable facial treatments such as hyaluronic acid fillers and botulinum toxin type A remains poorly defined. The aim of this study was to measure changes in psychosocial health following aesthetic intervention with injectables in routine clinical p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: McKeown, Darren J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8081460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33936919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003578
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The impact on psychosocial health of injectable facial treatments such as hyaluronic acid fillers and botulinum toxin type A remains poorly defined. The aim of this study was to measure changes in psychosocial health following aesthetic intervention with injectables in routine clinical practice using the validated FACE-Q patient-reported outcome measure. METHODS: This was a prospective assessment of patients presenting at a single center for the first time for aesthetic treatment of the face with injectables in February 2020. Participants completed 3 FACE-Q scales at the baseline and again 2 weeks posttreatment: Psychological Function; Social Function; and Appearance-related Psychosocial Distress. RESULTS: Complete data were available for 35 individuals (n = 32 women [91%]; mean age: 45.9 ± 13.8 years). Twenty-nine (83%) were treated with hyaluronic acid filler (mean: 2.3 ± 1.3 syringes), and 12 (34%) received onabotulinumtoxinA (mean: 2.0 ± 0.7 areas of the upper face). There were significant improvements on each FACE-Q scale posttreatment: mean change in Psychological Function score was +12.4 [95% CI: 7.9, 16.9; P < 0.001; standardized effect size by Cohen’s d: 0.93]; mean change in Social Function score was +7.9 (95% CI: 3.3, 12.5; P = 0.001; effect size: 0.50); and mean change in Appearance-related Psychosocial Distress score was –20.9 (95% CI: –27.4, –14.3; P < 0.001; effect size: 1.27). CONCLUSIONS: Aesthetic treatment with injectables was associated with significant improvements in patient-reported psychological and social functioning and reductions in appearance-related distress. This change underlines the value of these therapies for improving psychosocial health in well-selected patients.