Cargando…

Designing a Liver Transplant Patient and Family Decision Support Tool for Organ Offer Decisions

BACKGROUND. For liver transplant candidates on the waiting list, deciding to accept a donor organ with known or potential risk factors can be stressful and can lead to declined offers. Current education for patients and family often takes place during transplant evaluations and can be overwhelming a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schaffhausen, Cory R., Bruin, Marilyn J., Chu, Sauman, McKinney, Warren T., Lake, Jack R., Chinnakotla, Srinath, Israni, Ajay K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8081471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33937520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001140
_version_ 1783685647065677824
author Schaffhausen, Cory R.
Bruin, Marilyn J.
Chu, Sauman
McKinney, Warren T.
Lake, Jack R.
Chinnakotla, Srinath
Israni, Ajay K.
author_facet Schaffhausen, Cory R.
Bruin, Marilyn J.
Chu, Sauman
McKinney, Warren T.
Lake, Jack R.
Chinnakotla, Srinath
Israni, Ajay K.
author_sort Schaffhausen, Cory R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND. For liver transplant candidates on the waiting list, deciding to accept a donor organ with known or potential risk factors can be stressful and can lead to declined offers. Current education for patients and family often takes place during transplant evaluations and can be overwhelming and result in low retention and poor understanding of donor quality. METHODS. In the first phase, we sought to understand provider experiences when counseling patients about donor risks and donor offers. We conducted interviews and focus groups with liver transplant providers at 1 local center and at a national clinician conference. Twenty providers participated: 15 hepatologists and 5 surgeons. The provider feedback was used to create an initial outline of content that is consistent with decision support frameworks. In a second phase, graphic design collaborators created mockups of a patient-friendly tool. We reviewed mockups with 4 transplant coordinators and 9 liver transplant candidates for feedback on clarity and utility to prepare for an organ offer. Patient responses allowed a comparison of perceived readiness to receive an offer call before and after viewing mockups. RESULTS. We identified themes relating to the offer process, repetition and timing of education, and standardization and tailoring of content. The results indicated a gap in available education after the evaluation session, and information specific to offer decisions is needed. Patient feedback emphasized the need to review the offer process before a real offer. CONCLUSIONS. Patients and providers responded favorably to a patient tool addressing existing gaps in education while waiting for a donor offer. Additional patient, family, and provider feedback will guide the development of an interactive tool to prepare patients and families for an offer decision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8081471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80814712021-04-30 Designing a Liver Transplant Patient and Family Decision Support Tool for Organ Offer Decisions Schaffhausen, Cory R. Bruin, Marilyn J. Chu, Sauman McKinney, Warren T. Lake, Jack R. Chinnakotla, Srinath Israni, Ajay K. Transplant Direct Liver Transplantation BACKGROUND. For liver transplant candidates on the waiting list, deciding to accept a donor organ with known or potential risk factors can be stressful and can lead to declined offers. Current education for patients and family often takes place during transplant evaluations and can be overwhelming and result in low retention and poor understanding of donor quality. METHODS. In the first phase, we sought to understand provider experiences when counseling patients about donor risks and donor offers. We conducted interviews and focus groups with liver transplant providers at 1 local center and at a national clinician conference. Twenty providers participated: 15 hepatologists and 5 surgeons. The provider feedback was used to create an initial outline of content that is consistent with decision support frameworks. In a second phase, graphic design collaborators created mockups of a patient-friendly tool. We reviewed mockups with 4 transplant coordinators and 9 liver transplant candidates for feedback on clarity and utility to prepare for an organ offer. Patient responses allowed a comparison of perceived readiness to receive an offer call before and after viewing mockups. RESULTS. We identified themes relating to the offer process, repetition and timing of education, and standardization and tailoring of content. The results indicated a gap in available education after the evaluation session, and information specific to offer decisions is needed. Patient feedback emphasized the need to review the offer process before a real offer. CONCLUSIONS. Patients and providers responded favorably to a patient tool addressing existing gaps in education while waiting for a donor offer. Additional patient, family, and provider feedback will guide the development of an interactive tool to prepare patients and families for an offer decision. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8081471/ /pubmed/33937520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001140 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Transplantation Direct. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Liver Transplantation
Schaffhausen, Cory R.
Bruin, Marilyn J.
Chu, Sauman
McKinney, Warren T.
Lake, Jack R.
Chinnakotla, Srinath
Israni, Ajay K.
Designing a Liver Transplant Patient and Family Decision Support Tool for Organ Offer Decisions
title Designing a Liver Transplant Patient and Family Decision Support Tool for Organ Offer Decisions
title_full Designing a Liver Transplant Patient and Family Decision Support Tool for Organ Offer Decisions
title_fullStr Designing a Liver Transplant Patient and Family Decision Support Tool for Organ Offer Decisions
title_full_unstemmed Designing a Liver Transplant Patient and Family Decision Support Tool for Organ Offer Decisions
title_short Designing a Liver Transplant Patient and Family Decision Support Tool for Organ Offer Decisions
title_sort designing a liver transplant patient and family decision support tool for organ offer decisions
topic Liver Transplantation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8081471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33937520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001140
work_keys_str_mv AT schaffhausencoryr designingalivertransplantpatientandfamilydecisionsupporttoolfororganofferdecisions
AT bruinmarilynj designingalivertransplantpatientandfamilydecisionsupporttoolfororganofferdecisions
AT chusauman designingalivertransplantpatientandfamilydecisionsupporttoolfororganofferdecisions
AT mckinneywarrent designingalivertransplantpatientandfamilydecisionsupporttoolfororganofferdecisions
AT lakejackr designingalivertransplantpatientandfamilydecisionsupporttoolfororganofferdecisions
AT chinnakotlasrinath designingalivertransplantpatientandfamilydecisionsupporttoolfororganofferdecisions
AT israniajayk designingalivertransplantpatientandfamilydecisionsupporttoolfororganofferdecisions