Cargando…

Frameworks for Radiation Oncology Global Health Initiatives in US Residency Programs

PURPOSE: To understand trends, pathways, and experiences and to establish a framework for radiation oncology (RO) programs interested in developing global health (GH) initiatives. METHODS: An in-depth interview was conducted of all US RO programs with established GH initiatives. Programs were identi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Benjamin C., Chew, Jessica, Wakefield, Daniel V., Agarwal, Ankit, Jhingran, Anuja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8081518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33570998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/GO.20.00315
_version_ 1783685657944653824
author Li, Benjamin C.
Chew, Jessica
Wakefield, Daniel V.
Agarwal, Ankit
Jhingran, Anuja
author_facet Li, Benjamin C.
Chew, Jessica
Wakefield, Daniel V.
Agarwal, Ankit
Jhingran, Anuja
author_sort Li, Benjamin C.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To understand trends, pathways, and experiences and to establish a framework for radiation oncology (RO) programs interested in developing global health (GH) initiatives. METHODS: An in-depth interview was conducted of all US RO programs with established GH initiatives. Programs were identified by reviewing results of the 2018 Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology Global Health Resident Survey and individualized outreach to screen for additional programs meeting the following criteria: (1) active resident involvement in RO-specific GH opportunities, (2) active faculty involvement in these initiatives, and (3) department chair or program director awareness and support for ongoing opportunities. Among 88 residency programs, 11 were identified. Standardized questions explored the type of initiative, planning, staff and resident involvement, challenges, components to success, and history of programs through December 2018. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2018, 11 programs started initiatives. Total resident participants ranged from one to 13 (median = 3) in each program's history. Initiatives spanned education (n = 9 [82%]), clinical mentorship (73%), innovative technology (55%), bilateral hosting programs (45%), clinical development and equipment (45%), promotion of local research (36%), clinical care (36%), industry partnerships (27%), and remote tumor board (18%). Faculty involvement included radiation oncologists (91%), medical physicists (55%), and non-RO department faculty (27%). Six programs (55%) had faculty with prior GH experience. Four (36%) programs reported medical student involvement in projects. Barriers included international communication (36%), time for faculty (18%), funding (9%), and legal (9%) concerns. Commonest components of success included fostering relationships with international sites and identifying needs before solutions. CONCLUSION: RO GH initiatives were reported as positive, educational, and feasible across 11 US residency programs. Growth is expected, representing opportunities for innovation and service among US programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8081518
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Society of Clinical Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80815182021-04-29 Frameworks for Radiation Oncology Global Health Initiatives in US Residency Programs Li, Benjamin C. Chew, Jessica Wakefield, Daniel V. Agarwal, Ankit Jhingran, Anuja JCO Glob Oncol ORIGINAL REPORTS PURPOSE: To understand trends, pathways, and experiences and to establish a framework for radiation oncology (RO) programs interested in developing global health (GH) initiatives. METHODS: An in-depth interview was conducted of all US RO programs with established GH initiatives. Programs were identified by reviewing results of the 2018 Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology Global Health Resident Survey and individualized outreach to screen for additional programs meeting the following criteria: (1) active resident involvement in RO-specific GH opportunities, (2) active faculty involvement in these initiatives, and (3) department chair or program director awareness and support for ongoing opportunities. Among 88 residency programs, 11 were identified. Standardized questions explored the type of initiative, planning, staff and resident involvement, challenges, components to success, and history of programs through December 2018. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2018, 11 programs started initiatives. Total resident participants ranged from one to 13 (median = 3) in each program's history. Initiatives spanned education (n = 9 [82%]), clinical mentorship (73%), innovative technology (55%), bilateral hosting programs (45%), clinical development and equipment (45%), promotion of local research (36%), clinical care (36%), industry partnerships (27%), and remote tumor board (18%). Faculty involvement included radiation oncologists (91%), medical physicists (55%), and non-RO department faculty (27%). Six programs (55%) had faculty with prior GH experience. Four (36%) programs reported medical student involvement in projects. Barriers included international communication (36%), time for faculty (18%), funding (9%), and legal (9%) concerns. Commonest components of success included fostering relationships with international sites and identifying needs before solutions. CONCLUSION: RO GH initiatives were reported as positive, educational, and feasible across 11 US residency programs. Growth is expected, representing opportunities for innovation and service among US programs. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2021-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8081518/ /pubmed/33570998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/GO.20.00315 Text en © 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle ORIGINAL REPORTS
Li, Benjamin C.
Chew, Jessica
Wakefield, Daniel V.
Agarwal, Ankit
Jhingran, Anuja
Frameworks for Radiation Oncology Global Health Initiatives in US Residency Programs
title Frameworks for Radiation Oncology Global Health Initiatives in US Residency Programs
title_full Frameworks for Radiation Oncology Global Health Initiatives in US Residency Programs
title_fullStr Frameworks for Radiation Oncology Global Health Initiatives in US Residency Programs
title_full_unstemmed Frameworks for Radiation Oncology Global Health Initiatives in US Residency Programs
title_short Frameworks for Radiation Oncology Global Health Initiatives in US Residency Programs
title_sort frameworks for radiation oncology global health initiatives in us residency programs
topic ORIGINAL REPORTS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8081518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33570998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/GO.20.00315
work_keys_str_mv AT libenjaminc frameworksforradiationoncologyglobalhealthinitiativesinusresidencyprograms
AT chewjessica frameworksforradiationoncologyglobalhealthinitiativesinusresidencyprograms
AT wakefielddanielv frameworksforradiationoncologyglobalhealthinitiativesinusresidencyprograms
AT agarwalankit frameworksforradiationoncologyglobalhealthinitiativesinusresidencyprograms
AT jhingrananuja frameworksforradiationoncologyglobalhealthinitiativesinusresidencyprograms