Cargando…
Antibody Responses in COVID-19: A Review
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to spread worldwide as a severe pandemic. Although its seroprevalence is highly variable among territories, it has been reported at around 10%, but higher in health workers. Evidence regarding cross-neutralizing response betw...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8081880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33936045 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.633184 |
_version_ | 1783685725845192704 |
---|---|
author | Chvatal-Medina, Mateo Mendez-Cortina, Yorjagis Patiño, Pablo J. Velilla, Paula A. Rugeles, Maria T. |
author_facet | Chvatal-Medina, Mateo Mendez-Cortina, Yorjagis Patiño, Pablo J. Velilla, Paula A. Rugeles, Maria T. |
author_sort | Chvatal-Medina, Mateo |
collection | PubMed |
description | The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to spread worldwide as a severe pandemic. Although its seroprevalence is highly variable among territories, it has been reported at around 10%, but higher in health workers. Evidence regarding cross-neutralizing response between SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 is still controversial. However, other previous coronaviruses may interfere with SARS-CoV-2 infection, since they are phylogenetically related and share the same target receptor. Further, the seroconversion of IgM and IgG occurs at around 12 days post onset of symptoms and most patients have neutralizing titers on days 14-20, with great titer variability. Neutralizing antibodies correlate positively with age, male sex, and severity of the disease. Moreover, the use of convalescent plasma has shown controversial results in terms of safety and efficacy, and due to the variable immune response among individuals, measuring antibody titers before transfusion is mostly required. Similarly, cellular immunity seems to be crucial in the resolution of the infection, as SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells circulate to some extent in recovered patients. Of note, the duration of the antibody response has not been well established yet. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8081880 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80818802021-04-30 Antibody Responses in COVID-19: A Review Chvatal-Medina, Mateo Mendez-Cortina, Yorjagis Patiño, Pablo J. Velilla, Paula A. Rugeles, Maria T. Front Immunol Immunology The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to spread worldwide as a severe pandemic. Although its seroprevalence is highly variable among territories, it has been reported at around 10%, but higher in health workers. Evidence regarding cross-neutralizing response between SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 is still controversial. However, other previous coronaviruses may interfere with SARS-CoV-2 infection, since they are phylogenetically related and share the same target receptor. Further, the seroconversion of IgM and IgG occurs at around 12 days post onset of symptoms and most patients have neutralizing titers on days 14-20, with great titer variability. Neutralizing antibodies correlate positively with age, male sex, and severity of the disease. Moreover, the use of convalescent plasma has shown controversial results in terms of safety and efficacy, and due to the variable immune response among individuals, measuring antibody titers before transfusion is mostly required. Similarly, cellular immunity seems to be crucial in the resolution of the infection, as SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells circulate to some extent in recovered patients. Of note, the duration of the antibody response has not been well established yet. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8081880/ /pubmed/33936045 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.633184 Text en Copyright © 2021 Chvatal-Medina, Mendez-Cortina, Patiño, Velilla and Rugeles https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Immunology Chvatal-Medina, Mateo Mendez-Cortina, Yorjagis Patiño, Pablo J. Velilla, Paula A. Rugeles, Maria T. Antibody Responses in COVID-19: A Review |
title | Antibody Responses in COVID-19: A Review |
title_full | Antibody Responses in COVID-19: A Review |
title_fullStr | Antibody Responses in COVID-19: A Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Antibody Responses in COVID-19: A Review |
title_short | Antibody Responses in COVID-19: A Review |
title_sort | antibody responses in covid-19: a review |
topic | Immunology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8081880/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33936045 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.633184 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chvatalmedinamateo antibodyresponsesincovid19areview AT mendezcortinayorjagis antibodyresponsesincovid19areview AT patinopabloj antibodyresponsesincovid19areview AT velillapaulaa antibodyresponsesincovid19areview AT rugelesmariat antibodyresponsesincovid19areview |