Cargando…
Avoiding Full Lymphadenectomies in Intermediate- and High-Risk Endometrial Cancer by Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Implementation
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) to avoid staging lymphadenectomies by detecting nodal metastasis in intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS: A single institutional retrospective study was performed including all patients with intermediate- an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8082098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33937061 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.654285 |
_version_ | 1783685779522846720 |
---|---|
author | Pineda, Virginia García Zapardiel, Ignacio Gracia, Myriam Siegrist, Jaime Diestro, María Dolores Alonso, María Hernández, Alicia |
author_facet | Pineda, Virginia García Zapardiel, Ignacio Gracia, Myriam Siegrist, Jaime Diestro, María Dolores Alonso, María Hernández, Alicia |
author_sort | Pineda, Virginia García |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) to avoid staging lymphadenectomies by detecting nodal metastasis in intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS: A single institutional retrospective study was performed including all patients with intermediate- and high-risk EC who underwent surgical nodal staging between January 2012 and December 2019. Patients with disseminated disease detected on imaging techniques or at the time of surgery were excluded. Patients were evaluable if they underwent nodal staging with SLNB and pelvic (PLD) and paraaortic (PALD) lymph node dissection. We analyzed the accuracy of the sentinel lymph node technique. Only patients with at least one sentinel lymph node (SLN) detected were included in the sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) analyses. The tracers used were technetium 99m, blue dye, and indocyanine green. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients presented intermediate- and high-risk EC (51 patients and 37 patients respectively) and underwent SLNB with consecutive PLD and PALD. The median (range) number of sentinel nodes retrieved was 2.9 (0–11). The global detection rate of SLN was 96.6% with a bilateral detection of 80.7% when considering all tracers used. However, when combination of indocyanine green and technetium was used the bilateral detection rate was 90.3%. Nodal metastases were detected in 17 (19.3%) cases, 8 (47%) of them corresponded to low volume metastasis (LVM), 7 (87.5%) of them diagnosed at ultrastaging pathologic exam. Finally, we obtained a sensitivity of 90%, a NPV of 97.5%, and a false negative rate (FNR) of 10% in the intermediate-risk EC compared to sensitivity of 85.7%, NPV of 96.6%, and FNR of 14.3% in the high-risk EC group. The only patient with isolated paraaortic nodal metastasis was found at the high-risk group, 1.1%. CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, full lymphadenectomy could be avoided by performing SLNB in patients with intermediate-risk EC because the only false negative case detected was at the beginning of ICG learning curve. For high-risk EC patients we did not find enough evidence to support the systematic avoidance of staging full lymph node dissection. Nevertheless, SLNB should be performed in all cases of EC as it improves LVM diagnosis substantially. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8082098 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-80820982021-04-30 Avoiding Full Lymphadenectomies in Intermediate- and High-Risk Endometrial Cancer by Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Implementation Pineda, Virginia García Zapardiel, Ignacio Gracia, Myriam Siegrist, Jaime Diestro, María Dolores Alonso, María Hernández, Alicia Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) to avoid staging lymphadenectomies by detecting nodal metastasis in intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS: A single institutional retrospective study was performed including all patients with intermediate- and high-risk EC who underwent surgical nodal staging between January 2012 and December 2019. Patients with disseminated disease detected on imaging techniques or at the time of surgery were excluded. Patients were evaluable if they underwent nodal staging with SLNB and pelvic (PLD) and paraaortic (PALD) lymph node dissection. We analyzed the accuracy of the sentinel lymph node technique. Only patients with at least one sentinel lymph node (SLN) detected were included in the sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) analyses. The tracers used were technetium 99m, blue dye, and indocyanine green. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients presented intermediate- and high-risk EC (51 patients and 37 patients respectively) and underwent SLNB with consecutive PLD and PALD. The median (range) number of sentinel nodes retrieved was 2.9 (0–11). The global detection rate of SLN was 96.6% with a bilateral detection of 80.7% when considering all tracers used. However, when combination of indocyanine green and technetium was used the bilateral detection rate was 90.3%. Nodal metastases were detected in 17 (19.3%) cases, 8 (47%) of them corresponded to low volume metastasis (LVM), 7 (87.5%) of them diagnosed at ultrastaging pathologic exam. Finally, we obtained a sensitivity of 90%, a NPV of 97.5%, and a false negative rate (FNR) of 10% in the intermediate-risk EC compared to sensitivity of 85.7%, NPV of 96.6%, and FNR of 14.3% in the high-risk EC group. The only patient with isolated paraaortic nodal metastasis was found at the high-risk group, 1.1%. CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, full lymphadenectomy could be avoided by performing SLNB in patients with intermediate-risk EC because the only false negative case detected was at the beginning of ICG learning curve. For high-risk EC patients we did not find enough evidence to support the systematic avoidance of staging full lymph node dissection. Nevertheless, SLNB should be performed in all cases of EC as it improves LVM diagnosis substantially. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8082098/ /pubmed/33937061 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.654285 Text en Copyright © 2021 Pineda, Zapardiel, Gracia, Siegrist, Diestro, Alonso and Hernández https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Pineda, Virginia García Zapardiel, Ignacio Gracia, Myriam Siegrist, Jaime Diestro, María Dolores Alonso, María Hernández, Alicia Avoiding Full Lymphadenectomies in Intermediate- and High-Risk Endometrial Cancer by Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Implementation |
title | Avoiding Full Lymphadenectomies in Intermediate- and High-Risk Endometrial Cancer by Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Implementation |
title_full | Avoiding Full Lymphadenectomies in Intermediate- and High-Risk Endometrial Cancer by Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Implementation |
title_fullStr | Avoiding Full Lymphadenectomies in Intermediate- and High-Risk Endometrial Cancer by Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Implementation |
title_full_unstemmed | Avoiding Full Lymphadenectomies in Intermediate- and High-Risk Endometrial Cancer by Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Implementation |
title_short | Avoiding Full Lymphadenectomies in Intermediate- and High-Risk Endometrial Cancer by Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Implementation |
title_sort | avoiding full lymphadenectomies in intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer by sentinel lymph node biopsy implementation |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8082098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33937061 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.654285 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pinedavirginiagarcia avoidingfulllymphadenectomiesinintermediateandhighriskendometrialcancerbysentinellymphnodebiopsyimplementation AT zapardielignacio avoidingfulllymphadenectomiesinintermediateandhighriskendometrialcancerbysentinellymphnodebiopsyimplementation AT graciamyriam avoidingfulllymphadenectomiesinintermediateandhighriskendometrialcancerbysentinellymphnodebiopsyimplementation AT siegristjaime avoidingfulllymphadenectomiesinintermediateandhighriskendometrialcancerbysentinellymphnodebiopsyimplementation AT diestromariadolores avoidingfulllymphadenectomiesinintermediateandhighriskendometrialcancerbysentinellymphnodebiopsyimplementation AT alonsomaria avoidingfulllymphadenectomiesinintermediateandhighriskendometrialcancerbysentinellymphnodebiopsyimplementation AT hernandezalicia avoidingfulllymphadenectomiesinintermediateandhighriskendometrialcancerbysentinellymphnodebiopsyimplementation |