Cargando…

Assessment of Length and Readability of Informed Consent Documents for COVID-19 Vaccine Trials

IMPORTANCE: Informed consent is a fundamental element of research ethics. The COVID-19 vaccine trials are high profile trials that have enrolled more than 100 000 participants. Consent documents must be succinct and understandable to ensure informed voluntary participation. OBJECTIVE: To assess how...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emanuel, Ezekiel J., Boyle, Connor W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8082317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33909052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10843
_version_ 1783685825540653056
author Emanuel, Ezekiel J.
Boyle, Connor W.
author_facet Emanuel, Ezekiel J.
Boyle, Connor W.
author_sort Emanuel, Ezekiel J.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Informed consent is a fundamental element of research ethics. The COVID-19 vaccine trials are high profile trials that have enrolled more than 100 000 participants. Consent documents must be succinct and understandable to ensure informed voluntary participation. OBJECTIVE: To assess how well informed consent documents of the COVID-19 vaccine trials achieve the ideal of being succinct and understandable, and to create a shorter, more readable document. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This quality improvement study collected and analyzed the informed consent documents used in 4 COVID-19 vaccine phase III randomized clinical trials to quantitatively assess readability and length and, based on this analysis, created a measurably more accessible informed consent document. Analysis was conducted from October 2020 to January 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcomes were number of words (measured as word count), time-to-read (measured at reading speeds of 175-300 words per minute), language complexity (measured using Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level assessment), and readability (measured using Flesch Reading Ease Score). Secondary outcomes included clarity of how the placebo group could access the vaccine if it is proven safe and effective. The study also examined the length and readability of an improved consent document. RESULTS: The 4 informed consent documents were a mean (range) of 8333 (7821 to 9340) words long, with a mean (range) 35 (32.6 to 38.9) minutes to read at 240 words per minute. All documents exceeded grade 9 language complexity and scored lower than 60 in the formal reading ease metric, which constitutes difficult. Only 1 document specified that participants in the placebo group might receive vaccine. It was possible to write a document in fewer than 3000 words with a grade 7 to 8 reading level and a formal readability score that was not difficult. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that existing COVID-19 vaccine informed consent documents were too long, difficult to read, and exceeded grade 9 in language complexity. It was possible to create a shorter, more readable informed consent document for these trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8082317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-80823172021-05-06 Assessment of Length and Readability of Informed Consent Documents for COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Emanuel, Ezekiel J. Boyle, Connor W. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Informed consent is a fundamental element of research ethics. The COVID-19 vaccine trials are high profile trials that have enrolled more than 100 000 participants. Consent documents must be succinct and understandable to ensure informed voluntary participation. OBJECTIVE: To assess how well informed consent documents of the COVID-19 vaccine trials achieve the ideal of being succinct and understandable, and to create a shorter, more readable document. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This quality improvement study collected and analyzed the informed consent documents used in 4 COVID-19 vaccine phase III randomized clinical trials to quantitatively assess readability and length and, based on this analysis, created a measurably more accessible informed consent document. Analysis was conducted from October 2020 to January 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcomes were number of words (measured as word count), time-to-read (measured at reading speeds of 175-300 words per minute), language complexity (measured using Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level assessment), and readability (measured using Flesch Reading Ease Score). Secondary outcomes included clarity of how the placebo group could access the vaccine if it is proven safe and effective. The study also examined the length and readability of an improved consent document. RESULTS: The 4 informed consent documents were a mean (range) of 8333 (7821 to 9340) words long, with a mean (range) 35 (32.6 to 38.9) minutes to read at 240 words per minute. All documents exceeded grade 9 language complexity and scored lower than 60 in the formal reading ease metric, which constitutes difficult. Only 1 document specified that participants in the placebo group might receive vaccine. It was possible to write a document in fewer than 3000 words with a grade 7 to 8 reading level and a formal readability score that was not difficult. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that existing COVID-19 vaccine informed consent documents were too long, difficult to read, and exceeded grade 9 in language complexity. It was possible to create a shorter, more readable informed consent document for these trials. American Medical Association 2021-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8082317/ /pubmed/33909052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10843 Text en Copyright 2021 Emanuel EJ et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Emanuel, Ezekiel J.
Boyle, Connor W.
Assessment of Length and Readability of Informed Consent Documents for COVID-19 Vaccine Trials
title Assessment of Length and Readability of Informed Consent Documents for COVID-19 Vaccine Trials
title_full Assessment of Length and Readability of Informed Consent Documents for COVID-19 Vaccine Trials
title_fullStr Assessment of Length and Readability of Informed Consent Documents for COVID-19 Vaccine Trials
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Length and Readability of Informed Consent Documents for COVID-19 Vaccine Trials
title_short Assessment of Length and Readability of Informed Consent Documents for COVID-19 Vaccine Trials
title_sort assessment of length and readability of informed consent documents for covid-19 vaccine trials
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8082317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33909052
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10843
work_keys_str_mv AT emanuelezekielj assessmentoflengthandreadabilityofinformedconsentdocumentsforcovid19vaccinetrials
AT boyleconnorw assessmentoflengthandreadabilityofinformedconsentdocumentsforcovid19vaccinetrials